This is an interesting study. This link is to the summary. There is a link there to the full study. 600 people with active disease of over 2 weeks completed a survey to find out just what people are experiencing with the illness. I find the following most interesting:
● Early testing is crucial, and questions remain around test accuracy: Despite all respondents showing COVID-19 symptoms, 47.8% were either denied testing or not tested for another reason. The main difference between respondents who tested positive and those who tested negative was how early in their illness they were tested (on average day 10 for those testing positive, and day 16 for those testing negative).
Furthermore, the only difference in symptoms between these groups is that those who tested positive reported loss of smell and loss of taste more often, even when controlling for testing time.
It suggests that the test being used is testing for what ever caused the loss of smell/taste. But, if that is not you, you test negative. It also appears that the longer you are into the disease, the less likely you will test positive.
Both of those combined suggest the need to test for a different marker of the virus as what is being tested for does not react the same in too many cases and may even pass away thus no longer being present.
I have had this re-posted today because I believe it is as relevant today as when I wrote it in May, 2009. My hope is that this event we are living moves enough new people to realize the society we built is not sustainable. My hope is that one of the basic questions I was trying to answer in a more completely when I started blogging at AB is answered in a manner such that the nation and ultimately humanity becomes more inclusive: Why do we have an economy? I will not accept the answer: To make money.
I believe today, people are discovering the rat race they have voted themselves into. I hope enough people will come to understand that just making money is not life sustaining.
My concern is that the use of the “war” analogy will lead us to policy which implies an end point…a win. We are not at war. You can not have a war with nature. Nature has no ideology to fight against. Nature just is. It’s just doing. It has no persona. It has no intent. It just reacts based on what has come in the past. It’s not logical, it’s not irrational. There is no end. There is no win. There will be another virus. If we are lucky, only 1 virus at a time. Yes, as we saw the past 2 days, weather events still exist. Nature can do more than one thing at a time.
We are in the first nationwide crisis since the Depression. WW2 was not a crisis in this nation. The biggest difference between the Depression and now is that man created the Depression which had a natural event imposed on top of it (the Dust Bowl). That natural event only effected a part of the nation. Today we have a depression being imposed on us by nature. The entire nation. The Depression could and was undone by its creator. This current developing one can not be undone by the creator: nature. It can be argued that our policies pushed nature (pollution, climate change) and thus we created the disaster leading one to believe we can undo it. Not really. Not in the sense of simply undoing the policies that set up the environment such that nature has brought us to this point. Nature only reacts. It just does. There is no simple solution as with the Depression. It only required some policy changes addressing only the economy.
We can’t win. We can only live. Hopefully with a more inclusive thought process and thus society.
There were some good responses to the first posting that I agreed with. They were, could we say, jumping the gun as to how I want to proceed, however. So, with this post I want to continue with looking at phrases/concepts/thoughts that are a part of, or were a part of any discussion regarding “rich”.
Have you missed the phrase: Rat Race?
Wonder why we ask: Is the American Dream dead?
Could it be that in an economy where “rich” is not or will not be defined, the race is won and the dream obtained? After all, we’re all rich now! Sodahead specifically asked the question.
This is the complete letter Trump sent to Senator Schumer on April 2nd. It is beyond embarrassing.
Senator Charles E. Schumer
United States Senator
Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Senator Schumer:
Thank you for your Democrat public relations letter and incorrect sound bites, which are wrong in every way.
As you are aware, Vice President Pence is in charge of the Task Force. By almost all accounts, he has done a spectacular job.
The Defense Production Act (DPA) has been consistently used by my team and me for the purchase of billions of dollars’ worth of equipment, medical supplies, ventilators, and other related items. It has been powerful leverage, so powerful that companies generally do whatever we are asking, without even a formal notice. They know something is coming, and that’s all they need to know.
A “senior military officer” is in charge of purchasing, distributing, etc. His name is Rear Admiral John Polowczyk. He is working 24 hours a day, and is highly respected by everyone. If you remember, my team gave you this information, but for public relations purposes, you choose to ignore it.
We have given New York many things, including hospitals, medical centers, medical supplies, record numbers of ventilators, and more. You should have had New York much better prepared than you did, and as Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx said yesterday, New York was very late in its fight against the virus. As you are aware, the Federal Government is merely a back-up for state governments. Unfortunately, your state needed far more of a back-up than most others.
I know and have known about the use of collecting our data to sell us stuff. The concern for me is that there is almost no way for an individual to stop having their self tracked and mined any more based on this article. What is worse though than just having it used to sell me stuff is having it used as what clearly has become psych ops. We are clearly in the subliminal suggestion pathway to influencing personality.
Livingston described “these digital shadow campaigns” as “analogous to and perhaps an actual digital manifestation of ‘dark money’ influence campaigns.” In addition, he continued,
Overwhelmingly, these pages and groups do not have ownership declarations or Facebook verifications. We simply do not know what other digital properties might be operated by common sources with the groups. There is money being spent but we don’t know the sources. It is unaccountable spending.
The article notes the difference in expenditures on digital processes between the Trump and Clinton campaign (it was big) and that the Trump campaign has been developing obstructive since. This is the point I present my political ad: Time for the 1% who are still on the left to start spending their money to combat the money infrastructure the right has built. I’m talking to you Bloomberg and Steyer instead of for office.
I found this interesting. Mr. Giridharadas was invited to discuss his perspective regarding his themes of his book Winners take all. He was invited by the Dutch Parliament’s Finance Committee to discuss his book. All 6 parties showed up. All had been given the book prior and several had read it. This is a link to the entire 1.5 hour presentation via Youtube.
One of his points that I found most interesting was at 7:13 of the discussion, during his introduction he points out the role the Dutch system has played as a tax shelter inhibiting nation’s like the US to adequately tax. He notes, that the Dutch have a history of being very egalitarian with their governing approach, but their status as a tax haven is “exporting oligarchy to other countries”. His assement of the experience of presenting to the committee was that it was a group that was actually interested in learning. The above link to his twitter documents his thoughts on the experience.
What I am posting here is a link to an interview he did prior to the meeting with the Netherland’s VPRO TV. A public broadcaster. Mr Giridharadas position if that we need to stop buying into the economic elite’s position that they are the ones who can solve our problems. This is especially poignant when they are the ones who captured the economy via government, remaking it in their image thus creating the problems they now profess only they can fix. Enjoy.
(I tried embedding the video but it just kept disappearing, thus the link.) (Dan here…video after the fold)
I learned a long time ago at much personal expense, that there is a personality type which function within reality, but only in the present moment of reality. That is, what ever I say now has no bearing or relationship to what I just said or what I am about to say. I will deny what you thought you heard. If that is not enough, I will qualify it but…it has no bearing on what you believe I am saying. You can just never know and ultimately have no conversation that resolves.
It’s as if they can time shift. You can just never know and ultimately have no conversation that resolves.
That is what I believe we are witnessing today with the republican party. They are not protecting Trump. They are protecting an image they believe in at the moment fully dependent on what they believe is the reality which as I noted is only for the fleeting moment.
Being today was the day for debate club at the House Judiciary committee, and one Jonathan Turley is the republican witness as to what is or is not impeachment, I thought it is only proper preparation to have gone back and see what he has stated in the past. Sadly, it is apparent that none of the Democratic members did this simple activity in preparation.
I give you Mr. Turley on with Keith Olbermann during the Bush years regarding torture and surveillance the constitution and presidential power.
This clip is most telling as to his sincerity testifying today.
But, here he is regarding the president’s ability to continue a war even if congress cuts off funds. It’s a constitutional question in which he defends congress. When asked, he responded: No. It’s as simple as that.
Last and more relevant for today’s presentation, here is Mr Turley regarding Bush regarding the Constitution as just a piece of paper. That is, Bush thumbing his nose at the law. And note how Mr. Turley lists those in the administration that have run into legal conflicts.
“First of all, this president and his theory of power, is now I think so extreme, that its unprecedented. He believes that he has the inherent authority to violate federal law. He has said that…that he could in some circumstances order federal officials to violate federal law…Frankly I’m not to sure what he thought he was swearing to when he took the oath to uphold the constitution and our laws. I’ve never seen a president who is so uncomfortable in his constitutional skin. ”
“Unfortunately, civil liberties don’t swing back like other issues. Civil liberties is a very precious commodity. When you lose them, it tends to run out of your hand like sand. Its hard to get it back, and that’s one of the dangers here. That presidents, when they acquire power rarely return it to the people. And so, we have to be very concerned. This country is changing in a very significant way…We’re really at a point where the president is arguing about his own presidential power in ways that are the antithesis of that constitution and the values that it contains.”
Today he’s defending all that he protested against while on with Keith Olbermann. No memory. Only in the moment. What I say now has no relation to what I said or what I’m about to say.
Being that I have lots to say and have not had time to formulate it into posts I figured I would just start here. 2006. Do watch it. He tried to warn us. But hey…Now the news media is being threatened too and they are concerned.
I keep coming to these words: But don’t ask me what I think of you
I might not give the answer that you want me to”
One question for MSNBC who now puts on David Jolly regularly as the non-republican republican: Why has MSNBC not put John Dean on?
The way the technology Mr Wylie worked with was applied by Cambridge should be viewed as being as dangerous as any weapon humans have devised. I realize some will say I’m being hyperbolic. Have at it.
I remember being taught, even in school, how to understand the goals and effects of advertising including the means by which subliminal messaging works. It’s banned in some places, sort of regulated in the US. I was taught to be aware when watching TV. When we look at the progression of communication, the written word leaves the emotional interpretation to the reader and their personal life experiences as reference for understanding the author’s message. The ability to add a picture opened up a means for the author to be more specific in the message being presented. With the advent of recorded sound, even more specificity could be had via tonal inflections. But, when video came around, there was little room for the recipient of the message to not “get” the message. Jerry Mander wrote about this in his book: 4 Arguments for the Elimination of Television. More relevant today with the consolidation in the industry of broadcast. Watch his 9 minute talk and then read on. Today it’s the internet I believe that has replaced the TV.
Yet, even with the ability of video, the message was broadcast widely hoping to catch the few receptive. Not anymore. Data is the issue. There is the ability to build a digital you. Not the physical image of you, but you the person as lived via you brain. Your mind is digitally catalogued. You could say we have found the fountain of youth. Unless your data is destroyed, you will now live on for all eternity.
Cambridge Analytica is a tail of technology in the hands of “the evil genius”. As you will hear in Mr. Wylie interview, the development of the data processing was for the purpose of finding those who could be “radicalized” and then reach them before that might happen. Along comes Steve Bannon, a big money backer and the machinery gets turned on society. The intention was to target those who could be incited to anger and then incite that anger. Specifically mentioned is the Alt Right type personalities.
This technology is using all we know about how the brain/mind works and turning the knowledge on society for selfish want. Imagine how miserable, hurt, depressed, angry you have to be to want to move the world to be as you are? That’s Bannon. I’ve known people like this first hand. “I hurt and I want you to hurt”. This is consensus building without those targeted even being aware their consensus is manufactured. This is power beyond the threat of nuclear war. The goal is not to mold everyone. The goal is to mold enough such that serenity within society can not exist for the likes of Bannon. For others it is just power for one’s purpose. In the end, it is the ultimate tool of selfishness.
The company no longer exists. The machinery still exists and is still being used as a weapon. Defensive or offensive is a matter of one’s ideal/ideology of life. This goes beyond elections. I touched upon this a bit in my post looking at the phrase “Rat Race” and how it’s not a commonly appreciated concept anymore. The present process of “normalizing” or the idea of moving the Overton Window.
Or, it could be the ultimate tool for selflessness. But, we’er not even thinking about that question are we? Oh well, I guess the “free market” will solve it for us…Don’t ask me what I think of you, I might not give the answer that you want me to.