Much like Kip Sullivan in Minnesota/PNHP who Angry Bear has featured, Kay Tillow of Kentucky is a Single Payer activist. You will find Kip saying similar things about Medicare Advantage, etc. And we are all a little bit different attempting to reach the same goals . . . preventing the privatization of Medicare and achieving Single Payer. Kay’s article appeared on Common Dreams. I have added some things to her article and emphasized some points I thought were valuable.
Opinion | Why Are Corporate Healthcare Fraudsters Being Handed ‘Get Out of Jail Free Cards?‘ Common Dreams, Kay Tillow
The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the federal agency overseeing those national health care programs, has the dubious distinction of being light years ahead of other government regulators in excusing fraudulent conduct. CMS doesn’t just allow healthcare companies to repeatedly commit fraud and abuse with fines amounting to a tiny fraction of the profit; CMS goes much further.
CMS formally authorizes the violation of anti-corruption laws by granting “fraud and abuse” waivers to the corporate entities involved in experimental programs within its Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI or Innovation Center).
It’s true. CMS has an official webpage named “Fraud and Abuse Waivers” listings the programs entitled to their absolution.
The Innovation Center plans continue because they serve a different purpose, an unnamed purpose. They serve the privatization of the Medicare program.
CMS regularly issues “Fraud and Abuse Waivers” to the healthcare industry giants participating in its Innovation Center programs impacting millions of people. Accountable Care Organization (ACO) are the new form of the hated, managed-care organizations (HMOs) of the 1990s, infamous for drive-through mastectomies, and which will not be held accountable to the laws of the land.
How can this be possible? The Affordable Care Act of 2010, among its many provisions, set up the Innovation Center within CMS to promote experimental models in Medicare to save money while maintaining or improving quality, or would cost the same while improving the quality of care. Models approved by CMS can be automatically implemented into Medicare without congressional approval.
The Innovation Center models are not working to accomplish the stated purposes of quality and cost savings. Former senator Bill Frist and owner of the giant hospital chain HCA reports . . .
“The majority (Innovation Center models) have not saved money, and several are on pace to lose billions of dollars.”
Former Innovation Center director Brad Smith . . .
“the majority of models do not show significant improvements in quality, although no models show a significant decrease in quality.”
Only four of these models have shown enough success to be approved as a permanent part of Medicare. And these scaled programs aren’t yet making a major impact. The models are neither saving money nor improving care, but the Innovation Center has $10 billion dollars to spend each decade and keeps churning out new models, the latest on June 8.
Here we go again! Ten more years of fiddling with a broken system, while avoiding real financing reform.
Of course, we need to ask, based on recent trends in Medicare and more broadly … who is going to own these “legal entities”? Private equity? The billionaires?
The hazards of capitation are clear: Increase the monthly payment level for providers who have better health outcomes, that is, healthy patients who may not need much care. And link these payments to diagnostic (up)coding via risk adjustment. The truly sickest and costliest patients can go elsewhere, to providers paid fee-for-service. Avoiding the chronically ill might not be the goal of the traditional health care providers with their Hippocratic traditions, but, under this CMS model, certainly it would be a primary goal of their entrepreneurial employers and their billionaire investors. That’s what we’ve seen in Medicare Advantage and in CMS ACOs. Don McCanne & Jim Kahn. “CMS Primary Care Fiddling Instead of Real Reform.”
The Innovation Center models are the ones to which CMS grants the Fraud and Abuse Waivers. Let’s take for instance Medicare Advantage plans that are advertised to offer cash back on your Social Security check or up to $900 a year in grocery money. Those offers would logically be a violation of the law forbidding the offer of inducements to buy a certain plan. But these plans operate under the Innovation Center experiment called “Medicare Advantage Value Based Insurance Design (VBID) Model.” That model has the “get out of jail free card” from CMS. For the plan year 2023, the VBID Model has 52 participating Medicare Advantage Organizations with a total of 9.3 million people projected to be enrolled.
CMS waives the Beneficiary Inducements Civil Monetary Penalty (CMP) and the Federal anti-kickback statute to allow Medicare Advantage VBID plans to provide these cash, grocery, and other incentives. The excuse is that these payments are contributing to equity by ending disparities. The reality is that such plans provide incentives for seniors and the disabled to choose the for-profit plans rather than traditional Medicare. That’s convenient for the Medicare Advantage companies using the Medicare Trust Fund as their cash cow. Medicare Advantage plans cost the nation more than traditional Medicare and deny, delay, and limit care for increasing profitability. So why is CMS promoting the growth of these plans?
Among the long list of accountable care organizations (ACOs) and other models that CMS excuses from obeying the law is the Vermont All-Payer ACO Model Vermont Medicare ACO Initiative which is called OneCare ACO Vermont. The League of Women Voters of Vermont and the Physicians for a National Health Program of Vermont, among others, urged an end to the Innovation Center’s One Care ACO experimental model. The for-profit OneCare ACO, by design, does nothing to improve access to care and was supposed to reduce costs. Instead, spending continues to rise even faster than established targets.
Vermont organizations issued a press release and listed eleven reasons why the program should be ended, including the assertion that both hospitals and primary care are suffering from the program. The Vermont organizations concluded . . .
“It is time to redirect wasteful administrative spending on the ACO to actually providing health care, especially as the coronavirus pandemic exposes and exacerbates inequities in our system.”
The Vermont experiment by the Innovation Center has the fraud and abuse waivers extended by CMS. The for-profit OneCare Vermont is exempted from the federal physician self-referral law and the anti-kickback law. The program is scheduled to continue through the end of 2024 despite the community’s protests over the damage OneCare Vermont has done to the health care of the state.
The privatization of Medicare, through Medicare Advantage and Innovation Center models, requires the freedom of corporate medical and insurance entities to collect overpayments, escape oversight, avoid regulation, and violate anti-corruption laws without penalty.
The Innovation Center granted fraud and abuse waivers to the Direct Contracting model and to its successor program ACO REACH. ACO REACH currently has 132 participants in states across the country and places seniors and the disabled who chose traditional Medicare into for-profit, private Medicare ACOs. Seniors are assigned, without their consent, to ACO REACH plans owned by private equity, venture capital, and insurance companies which can take upwards of 25% of the Medicare money for profit and overhead. ACO REACH increases profits with the denial or restriction of care.
The Innovation Center models are not working to produce quality and cost savings. CMS continues them anyway ignoring a storm of protest by health care advocates. The Innovation Center model plans continue because they are serving a different purpose and an unnamed purpose. They serve the privatization of the Medicare program. All of these plans have private managers, middlemen intervening between patients and their physicians or other caregivers.
Why would a government agency issue waivers for fraud and abuse? Why would the agency give venture capital, private equity, and health insurance entities the freedom to violate anti-corruption laws without penalty? What possible good can come from this and why should the Innovation Center be allowed to continue to exist?
The privatization of Medicare, through Medicare Advantage and Innovation Center models, requires the freedom of corporate medical and insurance entities to collect overpayments, escape oversight, avoid regulation, and violate anti-corruption laws without penalty. CMS allows massive overpayments, bribes, and denials of care, as it places our cherished Medicare into private hands. As CMS issues waivers of fraud and abuse laws, the privatization is unleashed on an unsuspecting population.
The Little-Known Agency That’s Trying To Boil The Ocean, A Look At CMMI’s Decade Of Trying To Change Medicare & Medicaid, forbes.com, Bill Frist