…many things that upset too many entrenched groups, with the education and judicial proposals for it to pass. Indeed it may well be that this is where a bigger economic…

…attorney should be able to over rule a judge. Now he claims that the President’s judgement should count more than any (single) judges view of what the law says. Judicial…

Linda Greenhouse of the NYT comments: A Supreme Court quiz: Who offered this paean to judicial restraint: “If it is not necessary to decide more to a case, then in…

…action or Judicial approval have either not materialized or have been stopped in their tracks. The Executive has almost unlimited freedom of action in foreign policy, so it was a…

…legislative or judicial dispute, or promulgate manifestos as an organization. Make it so there is no political program to fight over, nothing to make members want to quit or drive…

…to actually predestine our efforts to failure. The reason is because the campaign is producing a lack of trust. “An economy with a very efficient judicial system, clear and enforceable…

…the Commander-in-Chief of the military as well as being in charge of the judicial system based on Shia Sharia, as the proper translation of his official title as “Supreme Jurisprudent”…

…giveaway to corporations and the wealthy. Additionally a bunch of lifetime judicial appointments have been made. On the executive side, there have been a slew of directives, and a bunch…

…the executive and the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government today and seek to entrench their dominance permanently in the judicial branch. The right-wing road to Trumpdom did not…

…greater significance is the court’s contention that great judicial deference must be paid to the president in immigration policies, and that his actions will be upheld so long as they…