…and local government police and judicial powers. Freedom is defined not by what happens to you but instead by which government, and what part of that government, is doing it….

…the tax administration, to reduced barriers to entry in many professions, to reforms of pensions, to reforms of collective bargaining, to reforms of the judicial system, etc. Many of these…

…and general behavior by the administration. The administration decides how much effort and the level of resources devoted to enforcement. It’s executive appointees write the rules and regulations. It’s judicial…

…fully, completely, totally preclude federal habeas review of state-court convictions, state judicial branches and anything that occurs in them are constitutional-rights-free zones to the extent that they want to be….

…of expansion of power should not be happening in an obscure forum – The Judicial Conference’s Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure – but in open debate…

…judicial system and bold claims of presidential power collectively sketch out a constitutional worldview that shows contempt for the First Amendment, the separation of powers and the rule of law,…

…and in foreign policy—and telling the public about Trump’s fiscal and regulatory policies, about his judicial and administrative-agency appointees, about who will be choosing them—and about what this will mean…

…whether its a Democratic-controlled, or instead a Republican-controlled, Senate that holds (or doesn’t) confirmation hearings on this nominee. And Supreme Court an lower-federal court judicial nominees. But if that involves…

…And of course the justices. Industry regulatory capture of the judicial-branch variety. I called this one right, in the title of this post yesterday. I mean, why even wait until…

…Executive and Judicial Branch To use #2 as an example, obviously equality of the law increased with the Emancipation Proclamation, and again, as the suffragette movement gained strength. One potential…