Arizona’s Worst and Best of Times
“Arizona: It Was the Best of Times, It Was the Worst of Times“, Substack, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
I ran across this substack a few weeks ago. The majestic and excellent basketball player I had watched play a wicked game of ball, can also write good articles. Since I now live in Arizona where the politics differ from my own, I thought this one article on two topics was especially interesting.
The new Governor is taking down the sea-container wall that Ducey erected, a wall intended to deter migrants. In another change of course, the new Attorney General, whom some consider lenient, is wielding what Kareem dubs “a jackhammer of hope,” repurposing the unit that once scrutinized voter fraud to now fortify voting access and fight voter suppression—a shift that’s stirring up conversations much like a trending topic on a 토토 커뮤니티 사이트. This refocus in Arizona’s mission is drawing eyes and raising debates statewide.
Additionally, there’s a growing discontent among Arizonians due to the Federal Government’s refusal to allocate $300 million for expanding I10 between Phoenix and Tucson. The wall, once seen as a safeguard, now being dismantled, could have covered two-thirds of this expansion’s cost. Beyond financial implications, there’s the looming expense of mending environmental harm, highlighting a tangle of policy decisions and their far-reaching impacts.
~~~~~~~~
Politics: Ex-Gov Paves Paradise; New AG Brings a Jackhammer of Hope.
“Ex-Arizona governor’s illegal makeshift border wall is torn down – but at what cost?” The Guardian.
SUMMARY: “Former governor Doug Ducey had planned to build 10 miles of border ‘wall’ made up of double-stacked old shipping containers through the federally protected forest.
“But local residents and environmental groups occupied the construction site, running out the clock in December on Republican Ducey’s waning days in office.
“Ducey, under threat of litigation from the Department of Justice, finally agreed to remove the rusty hulking barriers installed near Yuma in the west and Sierra Vista in the south-east of the state. Environmentalists are now warning that the damage already done to the areas will require a huge recovery effort.
“ . . . Now two related lawsuits [one is now moot] between Ducey and the federal government are on hold as Arizona’s new governor, Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, negotiates the project’s end.”
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar‘s Take: What’s the financial cost to Arizonians for Ducey’s attempt to remain politically relevant after leaving office? First, the Arizona-based Center for Biological Diversity has filed two lawsuits against Ducey and AshBritt, the Florida-based company that installed the makeshift wall, citing violations of the federal Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act. Second, Ashbritt, the company that installed the wall for $123.6 million, is also being paid $76.5 million to remove it. That’s $200 million paid by taxpayers for a wall that didn’t do anything (certainly not keep out immigrants) but promote the man who wanted to fluff his own career at the expense of all the good that amount of money could have done for Arizonians.
Politics at its worst by a politician who is the worst.
“Arizona’s new attorney general to use election fraud unit to boost voting rights,“ The Guardian.
SUMMARY: “A unit created under the former Republican attorney general of Arizona to investigate claims of election fraud will now focus on voting rights and ballot access under the newly elected Democratic attorney general.
“The Democratic attorney general, Kris Mayes, told the Guardian that instead of prosecuting claims of voter fraud, she will ‘reprioritize the mission and resources’ of the unit to focus on ‘protecting voting access and combating voter suppression’. Mayes won the attorney general’s race in November against election denier Abe Hamadah by just 280 votes, a race that went to a state-mandated recount.
“‘Under my predecessor’s administration, the election integrity unit searched widely for voter fraud and found scant evidence of it occurring in Arizona,’ Mayes said in a statement. “That’s because instances of voter fraud are exceedingly rare.”
“Mayes also plans for the unit to work on protecting election workers, who have faced threats of violence and intimidation. And she intends for the unit to defend Arizonians’ right to vote by mail, which has been attacked by Republican lawmakers and the state GOP in recent years despite being the most common way Arizonians of all political parties cast their ballots.”
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar‘s Take: Finally, someone who thinks rationally and not just about how to pander to the worst Arizonians. By worst, I mean those who would undermine America’s democratic infrastructure by denying the integrity of elections without any substantive evidence.
Are you an Arizonian who is an election denier? Then have the courage to take the Kareem Challenge:
You bring all your evidence of significant election fraud in your state to a panel of three impartial logic professors who will weigh your evidence and your arguments. If they find your evidence and arguments compelling, I will print a full apology. If you are wrong, you must donate all your money, house, and possessions to the Red Cross. So, how sure are you?
When I played basketball for Coach Wooden at UCLA, his policy was to try to make us be good men as well as good players. He drilled kindness and compassion into us as much as he did passing and shooting. His philosophy was that if we played our hardest for ourselves and our teammates, we would be winners as human beings. If winning games followed, that was a bonus.
That’s how I feel about politicians. I have no problem with them being ambitious and wanting to move into higher positions. But let them earn their way through their good deeds on behalf of the principles of the U.S. Constitution—not in spite of it.
“Arizona Election is Over Except for Maricopa County,” Angry Bear, angry bear blog
Democrat in Arizona Will Seek Sinema’s Senate Seat
NY Times – Jan 23
Representative Ruben Gallego of Phoenix is set to challenge Ms. Sinema from the left, after she resigned from the Democratic Party. …
(It looks like Kari Lake and Ruben Gallego will split about 90% of the AZ vote, according to current polls, leaving the rest for Ms Sinema.)
NY Times: … Among the Republicans weighing Senate runs are Kari Lake, the Trump-endorsed news anchor who last year narrowly lost her race for governor, and Blake Masters, who was defeated in a Senate race by (Mark) Kelly. …
For both Mr. Gallego and Ms. Sinema, the greatest factor will be the Republican nominee, said Mike Noble, a longtime nonpartisan pollster based in Phoenix.
A center-right candidate could consolidate Republican and right-leaning independent voters, most likely narrowing the chances for both Ms. Sinema and Mr. Gallego. A hard-right candidate like (Kari) Lake or (Blake) Masters, on the other hand, would most likely intensify the contest between Mr. Gallego and Ms. Sinema for moderates and the state’s large independent electorate, about one-third of voters.
“Heading into next year’s election, Kyrsten Sinema would like nothing else for Christmas than to have Kari Lake as the Republican nominee come 2024,” Mr. Noble said. “They both would love it.”
As noted, current polls show Sinema losing badly to Gallego or Lake, but she could be a spoiler for one or the other. But then, is Abdul-Jabbar also going to get into the race?
Polling shows Gallego well ahead of Sinema – but neck-and-neck with Lake – in a hypothetical three-way race. A Blueprint Polling survey taken early in January shows Lake with 36% support, Gallego with 32% support, and Sinema with 14% backing of Arizona voters. …
Democrat Gallego Challenges Newly Independent Sinema
US News – Jan 23
Alas, one might suppose that those AZ voters who were freaky enuf to support Sinema when she was a Dem, might still be freaky enuf to support Kari Lake.
Fred:
I have not seen EMichael in a while. Probably out touring. He knows more about Sinema than anyone else.
Even if I wanted to make that bet about election fraud (I don’t, as I don’t think I would have any basis for it in my state) I would never make such a bet for adjudication by a group of professors. For the most part, academics are so far out in Left field these days that I couldn’t possibly have any trust in the notion of selecting an impartial group with respect to much of anything political.
It isn’t really political. Just factual. That is the problem with all the evidence so far presented. Nobody saw anything first hand, or what they saw was not at all what they interpreted and wanted it to be. You have to show that fraudulent votes were cast, not that it might have been possible. And then you have to show that enough fraudulent votes were cast to actually change the outcome. Even that requires the assumption that all the fraudulent votes were cast against you, something that cannot be show by an examination of what few fraudulent votes we can find.
Kari Lake lost because a lot of people (thousands) voted Republican for every one but her. That has to hurt, but it doesn’t change the fact that thousands of ballots voted for GOP down ballot and either didn’t vote or voted Democratic at the top.
@Paul
“For the most part, academics are so far out in Left field these days that I couldn’t possibly have any trust in the notion of selecting an impartial group with respect to much of anything political.”
You obviously know nothing about academia. What is left field for structural biology? Organic chemistry? Mechanical engineering? Quantum computing?
What is left field for classics? Linguistics?
“Left field” means they can count to ten without using their fingers.
Thank you Kaleberg
Paul:
There is and was no basis for a complaint about election fraud in any part of Arizona. The hoopla about Maricopa County was laughable. Why so? The county is run by Republicans. Only one Commissioner is a Democrat. The Commissioner in charge of the election was a Republican. I did not look to see if the County was broken down into precincts or townships which could be gerrymandered into majority Republican. Did it matter? Not on my watch.
Lake, Finchem, etc. claiming election fraud is laughable.
“Where are the clowns?
There ought to be clowns
Well, maybe next year . . .”
“if the
showelection isn’t going well, let’s send in the clowns”; in other words, “do some jokes.”No need to bother with sending them in, the election clowns were already there. I hope the ones who are liable for costs are forced to pay them. And yes I lecture when asked to do so by my alma mater. Things like shop floor control, supply chain, etc. All the fun stuff making up my past.
Even so, thank you for your response.