…the “major questions” doctrine. It has provided a seismic shift in its approach toward agency power. This judicial approach gives judges broad discretion to invalidate executive branch actions of “vast…
…is misguided. CMS’s coverage decisions have always been subject to judicial review, and courts have generally deferred to the agency’s expert discretion as to whether to cover novel therapies, including…
…new state body has unfettered powers to interrogate Hungarians, demand their private documents, and utilize the services of Hungary’s intelligence apparatus—all without any judicial oversight or judicial recourse for its…
…of the 2020 election. What Supreme Court reporting needs to become is less of the credulous academic translating of a handful of judicial opinions and more cultivation of inside sources, procuring…
…prompted a rare statement from Chief Justice John G. Roberts rejecting Trump’s efforts: “Impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision.” Mic drop. Shortly after Roberts’…
…Judicial Watch organization had filed a $30 million civil suit on behalf of Babbitt’s estate. A 2021 internal review determined that Byrd saved lives. The administration’s hunkering down in right-wing…
…and Bade are both Trump appointees who rose to their station through the MAGA patronage pipeline, a sort of judicial “Alabama Rush,” where the stakes are higher, the process is…
…in America’s Institutions Across demographic groups, Americans with lower confidence in institutions such as the government, judicial system, military and integrity of elections are consistently more likely to express a…
BY that, Joyce Vance is telling you The Honorable John R. Tunheim does not want any more jello fed to him by ICE not following his judicial orders. Apparently. ICE…
…also establish expedited bipartisan review procedures and fast-track judicial review for major Executive Orders and emergency declarations. Presidents will inevitably be tempted to define more and more issues as emergencies,…