Pure, unadulterated evil is unleashed on this world
One has to ask how we have reached this point in the Middle East. There are many actions taken which have maligned Palestinians and Arabs. If we allow the Gaza to be abandoned by Palestinians due to terrorists, who follows? This sounds too much like the growth of Israel at the expense of the Palestinians. The West Bank is being partitioned as more Israelis migrate to it from Israel. When it comes to Israel, the US is too weak-kneed to do much about them. Israel is the most powerful nation in the Middle East as created by the US.
Commentary by Prof. Barkley Rosser . . .
The Public Reappearance of The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Angry Bear, Barkley Rosser May 2021,
Sigh, so much that is so obvious, and so much that is not, but so much that is so sad, especially as there seems to be little real prospect of any serious improvement or settlement on the underlying issues. Indeed, it is probably the case we did not see anything happen for a good 7 years because from the Palestinian side things looked so hopeless in the face of ongoing Israeli expansion of settlements in the Occupied West Bank and increasing suppression of their rights, with more and more political figures on various sides declaring that the Two-State Solution was dead, so fuggedaboudit.
With Bibi Netanyahu managing to get full control of the GOP line on things Israeli, and getting most of what he wanted from this while Trump was president, including a US embassy move to Jerusalem and recognition of the Israeli annexation of the Golan Heights, not to mention the Abraham Accords diplomatic recognitions by UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan, all this supposed to “change history.” And without Israel giving up anything to the Palestinians for any of these items, the first two of which had long been bargaining chips held by the US government in order to bring about a sustainable and reasonable Two-State settlement. But no, Bibi could even bring in screaming racists to his government, people the US government used to formally label as “terrorists.” But now, well, history was changed, and the Palestinians were just going to have take what they were given without any whining or complaining, much less any rock-throwing demonstrations or worse.
Excellent commentary by Prof. Heather covering the horrors we are reading about. I wish more people would come to understand we will soon have a stateless people . . . the Palestinians if we do not stop the terrorist’s actions and Israel from evicting them. Note the priority. Yes, it is horrific what has happened.
October 10, 2023, Letters from an American, Prof. Heather Cox Richardson
“[T]here are moments in this life . . . when the pure, unadulterated evil is unleashed on this world. The people of Israel lived through one such moment this weekend.”
So began President Joe Biden’s speech today about the attacks in Israel at “[t]he bloody hands of the terrorist organization Hamas—a group whose stated purpose for being is to kill Jews.”
“This was an act of sheer evil,” Biden said.
He described the slaughter in Israel in detail, noting that it looked much like “the worst rampages of ISIS,” as its fighters ravaged Iraq and Syria. Adding . . .
“But sadly, for the Jewish people, it’s not new. This attack has brought to the surface painful memories and the scars left by . . . millennia of antisemitism and genocide of the Jewish people.
So, in this moment, we must be crystal clear. We stand with Israel . . . And we will make sure Israel has what it needs to take care of its citizens, defend itself, and respond to this attack.”
Biden was careful to distinguish between Hamas and the Palestinians. “Hamas does not stand for the Palestinian people’s right to dignity and self-determination,” Biden said. “Its stated purpose is the annihilation of the State of Israel and the murder of Jewish people . . . Hamas offers nothing but terror and bloodshed with no regard to who pays the price.”
Former ambassador of Israel to the United States Michael Oren wrote on social media: “President Biden’s speech was the most passionately pro-Israel in history. The president stood four square behind the Jewish state and the Jewish people and unequivocally against terror and anti-Semitism, and pledged the power of the US to our defense. Our people will always remember and cherish this speech and the man who delivered it.” Israeli president Isaac Herzog agreed:
“On behalf of the entire people of Israel, thank you [President] Joe Biden.”
President of the Arab American Institute James Zogby told Barak Ravid of Axios that the speech “was expected, but it was disappointing . . . What I would have hoped for today is a call for restraint and for ceasefire . . . and a U.S. effort to play a leadership role in bringing about an end to the violence and offering some hope—both to Palestinians and to Israelis—that their security mattered, that their futures mattered,” he said.
But Biden’s speech did more than simply express moral support for Israel. It outlined increased U.S. military assistance to Israel, more U.S. intelligence, and more U.S. military force in the region “to strengthen our deterrence.”
That deterrence is undoubtedly a key part of the reason for this strong statement about the U.S. stance in the region, as leaders are eager to stop the crisis from expanding. “Let me say again—to any country, any organization, anyone thinking of taking advantage of this situation, I have one word:
Don’t,” Biden said. “Don’t. Our hearts may be broken, but our resolve is clear.”
That determination to limit the spread of the fighting by shoring up alliances and partnerships was behind the president’s working of the phones all weekend and was likely part of the more than three dozen meetings he and Vice President Kamala Harris have held with the national security team since the crisis began.
The effort to keep the violence from spreading will be at least part of Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s role when he travels tomorrow to Israel and Jordan. The U.S. is talking to Israel and Egypt about establishing a humanitarian corridor between the Gaza Strip and Egypt that will enable Palestinians to evacuate.
The president’s speech was not without notice to Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has vowed fierce retribution against all the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip for the actions of Hamas. Biden said that in a recent phone call the two had discussed “how democracies like Israel and the United States are stronger and more secure when we act according to the rule of law. Terrorists…purposefully target civilians, kill them. We uphold the laws of war,” Biden said, laws that prohibit deliberate targeting of civilians and require proportionate responses. “It matters. There’s a difference.”
Monica Alba, Carol E. Lee, and Peter Nicholas of NBC News reported the conversation was stronger than Biden’s speech indicated, with Biden warning Netanyahu that the U.S. will be watching closely for blowback to excessive force, especially if such force kills civilians.
Biden also suggested that the forces at work in Israel today could threaten us here in the U.S. He noted that the police departments, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation are taking steps to increase security around centers of Jewish life. “Let’s be real clear,” Biden said.
“There is no place for hate in America—not against Jews, not against Muslims, not against anybody…. [What] we reject is terrorism. We condemn the indiscriminate evil, just as we’ve always done.”
The speech undercut those Republicans who are threatening to withhold funds from Ukraine. The White House is also trying to get the Senate to confirm Jack Lew, Biden’s nominee for U.S. ambassador to Israel. This is a crucially important position in ordinary times, but even more so in such a crisis. Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) has been holding up his nomination.
Meanwhile, Congress as a whole is in limbo as House Republicans appear to be no closer to uniting behind a speaker. Today, four of the former Ohio State University wrestlers who claim Representative Jim Jordan (R-OH) covered for a sexual predator when he was an assistant coach there spoke up against his election as speaker.
“Do you really want a guy in that job who chose not to stand up for his guys?” one said. “Is that the kind of character trait you want for a House speaker?”
Representative Nancy Mace (R-SC) entered the Republican candidate forum today wearing a white T-shirt with a red letter “A” on it, saying she was doing so because of the backlash she faced as “a woman up here, and being demonized for my vote and for my voice.” Mace, one of the eight House Republicans who voted to get rid of former speaker Kevin McCarthy, said the A was her “scarlet letter,” an apparent reference to Nathaniel Hawthorne’s 1850 novel involving a woman forced to wear a scarlet A after giving birth to a child without identifying the father. MSNBC host Katie Phang called the stunt “performative nonsense,” and it does seem to indicate a preoccupation with media hits that appears to have taken over the party.
The Republicans had another setback today when a new indictment against New York Representative George Santos added 10 more charges against him, including lying about donations to jump-start his political career and then stealing money from donors to buy designer goods and pay his own debts.
The Democrats are united behind Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY).
This is a very important topic, so please, more clarity in what you mean would be good. Specifically the sentence “(i)f we allow the Gaza to be abandoned by Palestinians due to terrorists, who follows?” Who in this is “we”? Is the “we” in a position to plausibly allow (or disallow) this abandonment? Who are the “terrorists”?
Found on the web (where else?)
The Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intention of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. Matthew 24:9-13
Could have, you know, actually opened the book. I do, occasionally
Good one though, a reoccurring theme
Truth be told, something about all of this just doesn’t feel right …
I would sooner consult ‘Moby Dick’ actually.
Something in there about taking the land away from the Canaanites.
Pure chaos unleashed in Gaza.
Israel’s military has ordered the evacuation of more than a million civilians from the entire northern half of Gaza
NY Times – just in
Humanitarian Crisis in Gaza Worsens as Israel Prepares a Possible Invasion
NY Times – yesterday
Israel orders the evacuation of 1.1 million people from northern part of Gaza
AP – today
Israel’s military on Friday directed the evacuation of northern Gaza, a region that is home to 1.1 million people — about half of the territory’s population — within 24 hours, a U.N. spokesman said.
This could signal an impending ground offensive, though the Israeli military has not yet confirmed such an appeal. On Thursday it said that while it was preparing, a decision has not yet been made. …
(By evacuate, they apparently mean move to southern Gaza how ever you can, as quickly as possible.)
about 1000 bombs per day, collateral damage 1600 dead not sure any of them able to shoot an ak47.
military effect of Israeli terrorism is nil
Paddy:
They want the land.
I can not believe the Israelis are that dumb to let their guard down on the borders. They needed an excuse. I also believe we will find many more Palestinians dead than what has been reported. Malicious Malfeasance by the government and the military. Instead of forming a government, he should be tossed aside. trump disciple.
I am XMilitary.
In 1973, I was a logistics airman in a C 141 outfit, all our aircraft were ferrying weapons etc to pull Israel’ bacon out of that fire…..
I have been sympathetic, now dismayed.
NY Times – today
US Sees No ‘Specific or Credible’ Threat Linked to Calls for Day of Rage
VoA – yesterday
Vaguely related.
With the World in Crisis, House Republicans Bicker Among Themselves
NY Times – yesterday
(Well, if a Texas GOP guy says ‘they’ like it, the GOP should probably keep doing it.)
Newseek: A number of MAGA and conservative figures have suggested American citizens should arm themselves and stock up on ammunition ahead of a so-called “day of Jihad” on Friday. …
Law enforcement in major U.S. cities New York, Los Angeles and in Washington D.C. have stepped up security measures on Friday while stating there have so far been no credible threats of violence associated with the so-called “day of Jihad.” Both the FBI and the White House have told people to remain “vigilant” and report anything suspicious. …
Fred:
You are being abusive of the “use of various sites of news,” etc. especially the NYT. It is going to happen where they call you and AB out on this. I would ask that you cut back on the C&P.
With Prof. Heather, I have her specific permission to use her commentary. Barkley posted his info. here. There are places I have I asked for the legitimate use of thie commentary and have received such.
Thanks Fred
I rarely put up more than a few paragraphs of an article or op/ed.
You want shorter posts or much shorter ones? Their links are always of the ‘shareable’ sort, whatever that means, for the sake of traceability if nothing else.
Yer welcome.
@Fred,
Fair use is considered to be ≤10%. Please keep it under that number. Ideally, just post the nut graf and let the link do the rest.
Doing medical library work, such as I do, I am cognizant of Fair Use doctrines, but I (and many other medical librarians) must ignore them constantly to do what we do. This carries over here of course.
Such doctrines are designed to benefit publishers, not readers.
I will try harder to keep my librarian hat off when posting.
Fred:
I do not know what “shareable sort” is or means. If it is your opinion, it is not good enough. Four NYT articles is a bit much.
Some issues are really important and urgent.
The NYT is in effect the newspaper of record (IMO.)
Newspaper of Record – Wikipedia
(However) The New York Times no longer considers itself a newspaper of record in the original, literal sense
Maybe so, but they operate as if they are.
The NYT calls them ‘shared’. They may mean they are sharing them with their subscribers. If so, they might not work at all for those of you who are not subscribers. As I am one, it’s difficult for me to tell.
My rationalization is that it’s the easiest possible way to show where an (NYT) article is coming from. They provide such links.
Fred:
I have had enough of asking you to reasonably limit your C&Ps
Perhaps I could limit myself to c&p’s of ‘shareable links’ which provide traceability but perhaps no content whatsoever.
There Is No Way to Escape the Moral Challenge of War
NY Times – just in
the government that governs the least is best
israel is not a civilized entity
Israel is a place that believes it is constantly under threat of extinction, or would have us believe that they are. And they get frequent reminders from some of their neighbors.
The entire history of this component of the Abrahamic religions makes us aware of this.
Three religions, one god – PBS
Bear in mind.
The Sulzberger family: A complicated Jewish legacy at The New York Times
The Times of Israel – Dec 20, 2017
“Throughout the generations, the paper has maintained a veneer of objectivity — even as it buried stories of WWII atrocities against Jews.”