Freya’sday Five Elements …
Freya’sday Five Elements …
I caught up with Reich’s Substack Commentary by Robert Reich on Homeless on the Desert. June 16, 2023 in g’da said
New to the blogroll lineup, from Robert Reich’s Substack and the Smirking Chimp
The Washington Post calls Trump’s vision for a second term “authoritarian.” That vision includes mandatory stop-and-frisk. Deploying the military to fight street crime, break up gangs, and deport immigrants. Purging the federal workforce and charging leakers.
“In 2016, I declared I am your voice,” Trump said in a speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference and repeated at his first 2024 campaign rally in Waco, Texas. “Today, I add: I am your warrior. I am your justice. And for those who have been wronged and betrayed, I am your retribution.”
Borrowing from cultural theorist Umberto Eco, historians Emilio Gentile and Ian Kershaw, political scientist Roger Griffin, and former U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, I offer five elements that distinguish fascism from authoritarianism ~ Five Elements of Fascism.
1. The rejection of democracy, the rule of law, and equal rights under the law in favor of a strongman who interprets the popular will.
“The election was stolen.” (Trump, 2020).
“I am your justice. … I am your retribution.” (2023).
Authoritarians believe society needs strong leaders to maintain stability. They vest in a dictator the power to maintain social order through the use of force (armies, police, militia) and bureaucracy.
By contrast, fascists view strong leaders as the means of discovering what society needs. They regard the leader as the embodiment of society, the voice of the people.
2. The galvanizing of popular rage against cultural elites.
“Your enemies” are “media elites,” … “the elites who led us from one financial and foreign policy disaster to another.” (Trump, 2015, 2016).
Authoritarians do not stir people up against establishment elites. They use or co-opt those elites in order to gain and maintain power.
By contrast, fascists galvanize public rage at presumed (or imaginary) cultural elites and use mass rage to gain and maintain power. They stir up grievances against those elites for supposedly displacing average people and seek revenge. In so doing, they create mass parties. They often encourage violence.
3. Nationalism based on a dominant “superior” race and historic bloodlines.
“Tremendous infectious disease is pouring across the border … The United States has become a dumping ground for Mexico and, in fact, for many other parts of the world.” (Trump, 2015)
“I think any Jewish people that vote for a Democrat, I think it shows either a total lack of knowledge or great disloyalty.” (2019)
“Getting critical race theory out of our schools is not just a matter of values, it’s also a matter of national survival … If we allow the Marxists and Communists and Socialists to teach our children to hate America, there will be no one left to defend our flag or to protect our great country or its freedom.” (Trump, 2022)
Authoritarians see nationalism as a means of asserting the power of the state. They glorify the state. They want it to dominate other nations. They seek to protect or expand its geographic boundaries. They worry about foreign enemies encroaching on its territory.
By contrast, fascists see a nation as embodying what they consider a “superior” group — based on race, religion, and historic bloodlines. Nationalism is a means of asserting that superiority. They worry about disloyalty and sabotage from groups within the nation that don’t share the same race or bloodlines. These “others” are scapegoated, excluded or expelled, sometimes even killed.
Fascists believe schools and universities must teach values that extol the dominant race, religion, and bloodline. Schools should not teach inconvenient truths (such as America’s history of genocide and racism).
4. Extolling brute strength and heroic warriors.
“You’ll never take back our country with weakness, you have to show strength and you have to be strong. (January 6, 2021).
“I am your warrior.” (2023).
The goal of authoritarianism is to gain and maintain state power. For authoritarians, “strength” comes in the form of large armies and munitions.
By contrast, the ostensible goal of fascism is to strengthen society. Fascism’s method of accomplishing this is to reward those who win economically and physically and to denigrate or exterminate those who lose. Fascism depends on organized bullying — a form of social Darwinism.
For the fascist, war and violence are means of strengthening society by culling the weak and extolling heroic warriors.
5. Disdain of women and fear of non-standard forms of gender identity and sexual orientation.
“When you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ‘em by the pussy. You can do anything.” (Trump, 2005)
“You have to treat ‘em like shit.” (Trump, 1992)
I will “promote positive education about the nuclear family, the roles of mothers and fathers and celebrating, rather than erasing, the things that make men and women different.” (Trump, 2023)
Authoritarianism imposes hierarchies; authoritarianism seeks order.
By contrast, fascism is organized around the particular hierarchy of male dominance. The fascist heroic warrior is male. Women are relegated to subservient roles.
In fascism, anything that challenges the traditional heroic male roles of protector, provider, and controller of the family is considered a threat to the social order. Fascism seeks to eliminate homosexuals, transgender, and queer people because they are thought to challenge or weaken the heroic male warrior.
These five elements of fascism reinforce each other.
Rejection of democracy in favor of a strongman depends on galvanizing popular rage.
Popular rage draws on a nationalism based on a supposed superior race or ethnicity.
That superior race or ethnicity is justified by a social Darwinist idea of strength and violence, as exemplified by heroic warriors.
Strength, violence, and the heroic warrior are centered on male power.
These five elements also find exact expression in Donald Trump and the White Christian National movement he is encouraging. It is also the direction most of the Republican Party is now heading.
These are not the elements of authoritarianism. They are the essential elements of fascism.
America’s mainstream media is by now comfortable talking and writing about Trump’s authoritarianism. In describing what he is seeking to impose on America, the media should be using the term “fascism.” /”
Thom Hartmann also has a new post up lining out the MAGAt Republicans’ three step plan to take us there
My guess is the classical heroic warrior described by Marcus Aurelius is a lot different than authoritarian vision offered by Trump et al. One does not protect by enslaving. MA’s four pillars of stoic virtue were wisdom, courage, justice, and moderation; none of which can be found in our contemporary conservative camp du Trump. In any case, I recently procured the George Long translation of MA’s Meditations which is on my reading list for the coming winter. I have avoided reading this until now because I have never been a fan of emperors, but now with the impending doom of the man who would be king, then MA’s wisdom seems modestly relevant as a counter measure. Speaking of which, then maybe it is time to reread a bit of Kipling alongside Gulliver’s Travels.
i am not so sure it is that easy to separate authoritarianism from fascism. Certainly not if your intent is to say “fascism bad, authoritarianism good.” Authoritarians like to point out “there are no concentration camps,: we are equal opportunity destroyers of individual human “rights” one person at a time.
Coberly,
Yeah, but….
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nerva%E2%80%93Antonine_dynasty#Five_Good_Emperors
“…Five Good Emperors
The rulers commonly known as the ‘Five Good Emperors’ were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius, and Marcus Aurelius.[4] The term was coined by Niccolò Machiavelli in his posthumously published book The Discourses on Livy from 1531:
Machiavelli argued that these adopted emperors earned the respect of those around them through good governing:
Edward Gibbon wrote in The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire that their rule was a time when ‘the Roman Empire was governed by absolute power, under the guidance of wisdom and virtue’.[6] Gibbon believed that these benevolent monarchs and their moderate policies were unusual and contrasted with their more tyrannical and oppressive successors.
Alternative hypothesis
One hypothesis posits that adoptive succession arose because of a lack of biological heirs. All but the last of the adoptive emperors had no legitimate biological sons to succeed them. They were therefore obliged to pick a successor somewhere else; as soon as the Emperor could look towards a biological son to succeed him, adoptive succession was set aside..”
*************************************
All that aside, I am sickened even by the thought of trusting Machiavelli’s words, opinions, or judgement on anything. Also, Lord Acton made his point on the effects of absolute power well known. Nonetheless, with a popular leader and a senate then there was a petite republic rather than just a kingdom. Also, the power of people was at that time very competitive against the power of wealth. It takes a great deal of wealth to buy enough people to turn the table against the rest of the people. Back then buying power was paying armies. Earlier yet, all the strong healthy men were in the army and that army stood together against all peaceful men, foreign and domestic.
Ron:
Not bad . . .
In line with Sun Tzu’s Art of Peace …
https://web.phys.cmu.edu/~sgaan/webfiles/THE%20ART%20OF%20PEACE.pdf
THE ART OF PEACE
By Morihei Ueshiba
Morihei Ueshiba (1883-1969) was history’s greatest martial artist. He was the founder of Aikido, which can be translated as “The Art of Peace.” Morihei Ueshiba is referred to by the practitioners of Aikido as O-Sensei, “The Great Teacher”…
***********************************************
Aikido is considered a defensive martial art. So, the best defense is one that can counter any offense.
OTOH, contemporary established authority depends more upon controlling mass media than it does upon controlling all of the armed men.
Morality is one thing, whereas reality is most often quite another; e.g., the Holy Roman Empire.