…not to abridge, either by constitution, legislation, or judicial interpretation, without due process. Equates civil liberties and personal freedoms. FDR, in his The Four Freedoms speech of 1941 proposed the…

A government to consist of three coequal branches, the Legislative, the Executive, and the Judicial was chartered in that order by the first three articles of the U.S. Constitution. Three…

…is its reasoning judicial?” With divisive Supreme Court rulings coming, Barrett says: ‘Read the opinion’ (yahoo.com) Judging from where Justice Barrett gave her commentary, it was not meant to appeal…

…Texas ruled that the Biden administration can no longer exempt unaccompanied children from Title 42, a decision made by the administration earlier this year. The ruling is a judicial victory…

…legal by filing for a green card. He already had a valid work permit. SCOTUS ruled against immigrants seeking judicial review of mistakes and errors made by immigration agencies. In…

…to an ethics code, according to a poll released Wednesday, with one saying they should set a “very high bar for the rest of us to emulate.” The National Judicial…

…civil rights by arguing for judicial “originalism” that claims to honor the original version of the Constitution rather than permitting the courts to protect rights through the Fourteenth Amendment.  But…

…of constitutional interpretation.  This reflects a serious problem with judicial review in the United States:  the Supreme Court has way too much discretionary power, which is why the Court has…

…majority on the Court does. The Supreme Court’s power to overturn legislation which it judges to be unconstitutional — judicial review — does not actually exist in the Constitution.  The…

…could establish a non-partisan judicial review board. Congress could increase the number of justices significantly. Congress could require annual mental acuity testing on sitting judges and justices. The rot of…