…Trump’s actions in court. HRW details how the provision, if included in the final legislation, “would make it more expensive to fight Trump’s policies in court by invoking a federal…

…be the case in which it does. There is a “procedural” reason why the lower-level federal courts—the district court (the trial-level court) court in which the lawsuit was filed, and…

…in diametrically opposed positions, their only common ground being outright repeal. Which leaves the Supreme Court in a bind. Are they really willing to rely so heavily on the lack…

by cactus Holy wow. Here’s something in the NY Times: The Supreme Court on Monday ordered a federal trial court in Georgia to consider the case of Troy Davis, who…

…risk criminal contempt even if the order is ultimately ruled incorrect. The orderly and expeditious administration of justice by the courts requires that an order issued by a court with…

…who has been instrumental in the right-wing takeover of the Supreme Court. Leo has also been prominent in challenges to abortion rights, voting rights, climate change action, etc. “August 22,…

…to be frozen while the appeal worked its way up through the courts. By going straight to the Supreme Court, Smith appears to be trying to stop Trump from delaying…

…court, known as the FISA court. Even later, after the provisions of the Patriot Act had had time to take effect, there were still problems with the FISA court –…

…federal court claims the Department of Homeland Security committed some type of legal violation when it rescinded a Trump-era immigration policy. The Court has not identified what the violation is….

…case should never had been accepted at any court level. The Elenis case is all assumptions and hypotheticals. Some reading: Andrew Weissmann Baffled by Supreme Court’s Reasoning in Gay Rights…