Relevant and even prescient commentary on news, politics and the economy.

Help President Bush

MoveOn.org has had some so-so ideas, and some very clever ideas. I like this suggestion that it just sent out to its members yesterday:

President Bush told the press on Tuesday that he doesn’t “have any idea” whether the senior administration officials who blew a CIA operative’s cover will ever be found. But if he just asked his staff to sign a legally binding affidavit confirming that they weren’t involved, and referred anyone who wouldn’t to the FBI, it’s possible he could flush out the perpetrators in a day. To date, the President hasn’t even discussed this matter with his staff.

President Bush can do better than that. He could start by simply asking his staff to sign a legally binding affidavit. Show the President how easy it is. We’ve already done the President’s homework for him by writing the affidavit. Now let’s show him how easy it is for innocent people to legally declare their innocence. You can sign the affidavit and send it to the President in under a minute…

Sure it’s gimmicky, but it also effectively makes an important point. Where is that Plame investigation, anyway?

Kash

Comments (0) | |

Texas Nearly Redistricted

In the end, it took the exterminator-turned-Congressman, Tom DeLay, to iron out the differences among the Texas Republicans over how best to divvy up the spoils of John Whitmire’s cowardice (Whitmire is the Texas Senator who returned to Texas and gave Republicans a quorum):

…House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) spent three days in Austin this week brokering the final shape of the plan. State GOP leaders credited DeLay with playing a key role in resolving the final issue, an intraparty dispute between Republicans over congressional districts in West Texas.

DeLay’s role in the bruising battle left Democrats embittered. “Like [Republicans] often do, they overreached,” said Rep. Jim Dunnam, chairman of the Texas House Democratic Caucus. “Tom DeLay was here for three days. Obviously, it’s pretty repulsive. This guy was elected to represent us in Washington, and he’s got nothing better to do than come down here and mess up the Texas tradition of bipartisanship.”

While Dunnam may think the Republicans have overreached, don’t look for the win in Texas, or this week’s victory in California, to slow them down much–with a firmer grip on the House, they may just decide to reach farther.

AB

Comments (0) | |

What a Difference 30 Years Makes

The Washington Post has Nixon Tapes excerpts mentioning current Defense Secretary Don Rumsfeld:

Using the Nixon Tapes — the gift that will forever keep on giving — Mann found Nixon one night fretting about “the Rumsfeld problem.”

…In an April 7, 1971, chat, Nixon, Kissinger and then-Chief of Staff H.R. “Bob” Haldeman talked about the war in Vietnam. “I think Rumsfeld may be not too long for this world,” Nixon said, a few minutes later suggesting, “Let’s dump him.”

This next exchange is oddly reminiscent of what just happened to Rumsfeld on Iraq policy:

“He’s just positioning himself to be close to The Washington Post and the New York Times,” Kissinger said. (This is what the shrinks might call “projection.”)

“Well then, let’s dump him after this” speech to the nation that evening, Nixon said. “Good God, we’re sending him . . . on a two-month holiday to Europe. . . . For what purpose?”

“To get him out of town,” Kissinger said.”

AB

Comments (0) | |

Clark Update

It’s been a tough week for the Clark campaign, and a lot of the controversy centers over the role that Clark’s grass roots supporters (given that it’s on the internet, perhaps that should be “fiber roots” supporters) will play versus the role that long time DC political strategists like Fabiani and Lehane will play. Right now, it’s advantage: DC strategists.

But the internet supporters are down, but not out, as Tapped’s Garance Franke-Rutte reports in this post (in a much more fair and balanced way than in her previous posts).

AB

P.S. I somewhat disagree with Franke-Rutte’s characterization of Angry Bear as a “Clark-friendly blog”, even though I’m listed as such at http://www.draftclark.com/. This is a Democrat-friendly blog. I also contend that my previous posts were attacks on her selective presentation of facts and quotations, not really attacks on her (“Clark-friendly blogs — like Angry Bear and former Senate staffer Amy Sullivan’s Political Aims — have launched attacks on me for my reporting on the Draft movement”). On the other hand, she may have a point: comparing her to Bill Safire was probably below the belt.

UPDATE: Josh Marshall adds this:

Based on things I hear from various folks who are in the mix, I think that it’s much less clear-cut than this Internet types versus the insiders line we’re hearing.

What surprises me and, to an extent, impresses me is that Clark has managed to do as well as he has, even with this sort of chaotic management at the home office.

…Getting a campaign up to speed in a few weeks is no simple task. If Clark is someone who will make a good president, he’ll get this situation in hand.

…The big picture here is that there’s a vacuum of authority in the campaign operation. Because of that, all the various currents in the Dem party — out-of-power Clinton-Gore types, new-fangled Internet types, etc. — are trying to fill that vacuum. Bottom line: Clark has to assert himself over his campaign back office.

Comments (0) | |

Iraq and Spain

The US newspapers (e.g. the NYTimes) are reporting that a “Spanish diplomat” was killed today in Iraq by unknown gunmen. Spain has about 1,300 troops supporting the US in Iraq, btw. I gleaned two interesting points from the Spanish newspaper reports of the incident, however. First, according to the Spanish newspaper El Pais, the man killed, José Antonio Bernal Gómez, was an officer in the Spanish Air Force who worked for the Spanish intelligence agency (the Spanish CIA). I’m not sure if “diplomat” is a very good description of his activities.

Also, this incident provides a glimpse into the internal political debate in another country that’s tangled up in Iraq. The spokesman for the center-right government called it a “terrorist attack” that “reaffirms that we must continue working to achieve stability in and the reconstruction of the Iraqi community.” (Translations are my own.) Sounds reasonably similar to what our own government would say.

However, the leader of the center-left opposition group in Spain, Gaspar Llamazares, said that he was upset with the death of the Spaniard, but that he thought that this should serve as a reminder that while the Spanish government maintains its commitment to the “illegal war and occupation in Iraq,” Spaniards will continue to be at risk. Strong stuff.

Kash

UPDATE: It looks like the NYTimes has changed their description of the man who was killed. They now report that he was “a Spanish intelligence officer.”

Comments (0) | |

As Texas Goes…

…So goes the nation if we aren’t careful.

If you read only one CalPundit post, read this one. If you read only one really long post, also make it that one. Either way, read it. Here’s Kevin’s basic point, and it is well-illustrated throughout:

These are not the words of sane people. This is not “reform,” this is not “common sense,” and this is not “restraining government growth.” This is plain and simple madness and the people behind it have real influence.

AB

UPDATE: Link repaired (technical issues forced all of Kevin’s permalinks to change).

Comments (0) | |

Rumsfeld

I’m not quite sure exactly what this means, but I think it either implies that Don Rumsfeld is losing some portion of his mind or losing some portion of his authority. And, as far as Iraq is concerned, either one is probably an improvement. Here’s a sample from the story, but the rest is worse:

Appearing at a NATO conference in Colorado Springs on Wednesday afternoon, Mr. Rumsfeld tried to dismiss any talk of his diminished role in Iraq policy, suggesting at one point that reporters should concentrate on “something more important,” like the World Series prospects of his hometown Chicago Cubs.

AB

P.S. Rumsfeld also said this:

“The way I read the memorandum is that it is basically what the responsibility of the N.S.C. is and always has been,” he said. The agency’s role, he added later, “is what it’s always been,” one of coordination.

Yes, unfortunately, memos are sent on the most trivial of topics, but really, when was the last time you got a memo saying “Just checking in. In case you were wondering, everything is the same. Thank you for your attention”?

UPDATE: Link fixed.

Comments (0) | |

Anybody Catch This?

It must have been hilarious (via Joe Conason):

More fun with wussy Bill

Don’t miss today’s broadcast of “Fresh Air,” the NPR program hosted by Terry Gross. I am reliably informed that her guest, Bill O’Reilly, fled the studios in a fit of anger — and that the show will be played in its entirety, including his undignified exit. What did the tiny, soft-spoken Terry ask that drove big, blustering Bill from her Philadelphia studio? Hearing the Fox blowhard explode again may brighten an otherwise grim day.

For the record, Terry Gross is an extremely polite and generally accomodating interviewer, so the Loud One must have really, really, thin skin. Maybe Al Franken called in.

AB

UPDATE: The audio is here for the rest of today; thereafter, it looks like it will be here.

Comments (0) | |

California Questions

1. How long will it take Arnold to lose popularity as services are cut in CA? Will we see W. campaigning with Arnold in CA next fall? Or will W. want to keep his distance?

2. Will the White House end its undeclared war on CA now, and actually try to help Arnold with CA’s problems?

3. What do you think that Arnold will actually do now about CA’s budget problems? Will he keep talking in generalities, or will he actually make a policy decision at last?

4. Will a “Recall Arnold” movement make people realize how absurd CA’s recall process is? Will we see an initiative on the 2004 ballot to amend (or eliminate) CA’s recall process?

5. When Issa and friends started the Davis Recall movement less than three months after Davis’ election, did they really think that once they did it, someone else wouldn’t try to recall the Republican governor? How long will it take them to express shock and amazement at a Recall Arnold movement? Will they accuse Democrats of being sore losers, for trying to get rid of a governor who was just elected? Will anyone notice the hypocrisy?

6. Will a “Recall Arnold” movement succeed in gathering the necessary signatures to force a recall election?

7. Who were the 1+ million people who voted “NO” on the recall but then didn’t vote for Bustamante? What was their reasoning? I’m just curious…

Answers to any of these questions are welcome.

Kash

Comments (0) | |

Arnold Wins!

First, I don’t live in California, so this administration will be fun to watch. Second, G.W. Bush inherited a booming economy and made it much worse, but the economy and budget were in such great shape that even after the effects of Bush’s policies, the economy was only moderately bad by historical standards (but terrible compared to Clinton’s worst year). Sure, deficit projections are now at record-breaking levels, but that’s our children’s money so apparently nobody cares.

Here’s my point: Arnold’s inheriting a bad economy and a large deficit, not a surplus. Even if he does no worse than Davis, services will be cut, taxes will go up, or California’s credit rating will further deteriorate–or some of all three will happen. Certainly, he will seek to blame Davis, but I don’t think that will work. On the other hand, California voters elected this guy, so who knows what they will buy. As Kash cited earlier, the neat thing about democracy is that people get the government they deserve.

Me, I’ll take butter or some butter-like substance with my popcorn.

AB

P.S. CalPundit says that the impending recall Shwarzenegger movement will be bad for California, and bad for Democracy. From a static point of view, I agree. But in terms of emphasizing the absurdity of what just happened, and perhaps preventing it in the future, I’m all for it: let the games begin!

Comments (0) | |