Miracle on 34th St is not an economic solution

I was pulling on a thread today researching the product of cryogenic treated fret wire. I have a Les Paul style guitar I built from a kit while in college in the early 80’s that needs a new fret board. I stumbled upon this bit of history: Scroll down to response #11 CB Alyn

In Clinton F. Smith’s 1927 patent for a “Fret for Musical Instrument,” the Attleboro, Massachusetts inventor notes his style ‘T’ wire “preferably disposed in an alternate arrangement, and are not oppositely positioned, although arranged on opposite sides of the fret wire… Each of these frets consists of a wire ‘4’ having lateral projections shaped like the barb of a fish hook as shown. This ‘peculiar shape’ permits of pushing the frets into place easily but project into the neck of the instrument to securely hold the fret in the place and reduces the possibility of their coming loose when the instrument is in use.”

Although other examples of T-wire were made decades previous, Smith’s “alternate fish-hook arrangement” would prove to be a standard in fretwire design to this day. After receiving sample requests from other fretwire vendors, C.F. Martin decided on the Attleboro based Horton-Angell Company, C. Smith’s employer.”

Well, being from the area, this intrigued me. The history of industry in my area of the nation is fascinating when you understand the density and variety compared to what it is today. Of course, this goes for just about any area of the nation that was industrially developed. “Was” being the word considering the service economy mantra being pushed from the 1980’s onward. So, reading that the developer of the modern fret came from an employee of an Attleboro, Massachusetts jewelry manufacture, I just had to look up the company.

This lead me to this bit of writing on the industry of Massachusetts, Attleboro.

History of Massachusett Industries

Their Inception, Growth and Success

By Orra L. Stone

S.J. Clarke Publishing Co.

4 volumes, 1930.

pages 245-262 (without illustrations)

CHAPTER XIV

ATTLEBORO

CENTER OF JEWELRY PRODUCTION IN THE EAST

In 1927, there were 139 manufacturing establishments in Attleboro, representing a capital investment of $22,568,585. The total value of all products manufactured in the city was $28,799,791, of which jewelry, valued at $16,909,528, constituted 58.7 per cent.

Other leading products manufactured in Attleboro in 1927, were cotton goods; silversmithing and silverware; textile machinery, and tools. The average number of wage earners employed in all manufacturing industries was 5,540, of whom 2,721, or 49.1 per cent, were employed in the manufacture of jewelry. The total amount paid in wages during the year was $6,916,847, of which the wage-earners employed in the manufacture of jewelry received $3,579,077, or 51.7 per cent.”

I’m always curious as to what historical dollars represent today. So a bit of number crunching. It led me to question just how has the Massachusetts economy changed considering the push from the 1980 to de-industrialize to a service economy. All conversions are from the BLS CPI conversion 1927 to 12/2024 $100 = $1803.46

$407,015,403.04 today from $22,568,585.00 capital investment Attleboro 1927. $519,392,710.77 today from $28,799,791 total value of all manufactured products Attleboro 1927. $304,956,573.67 (58.7%) was from the jewelry industry.

Manufacturing employment breaks out as follows:

5540 employed in manufacturing. 2721 were of the jewelry industry. $124,742,568.91 today. Total wages paid from $6,916,847.00 in 1927. $22,516.71/earner today from $1248.53 in 1927

Non jewelry workers $60,195,346.84 today from $3,337,770.00 in 1927. 2819 workers. $21,353.44/worker from $1,184.03 in 1927.

For jewelry workers, 2721 (49.1% of total) they represent 51.7% of the wages. $64,547,222.06 from $3,579,077.00 in 1927. $23,721.88 earner from $1,315.35 in 1927. 11.1% greater than non-jewelry workers in 1927/today.

For some idea of what the state of Massachusetts was generating, in 1927 according to tax filings I used Treasury Department, Statistics of Income 1927. $304,429,841.00 in cash and stock dividend were paid out. The amount includes that paid out by companies with no net income. Page 311 of the report. This is $5,490,270,410.50 today.

The following $ are 1927 per the report.

In manufacturing the total number of company tax returns was 5325 with a total gross income of $3,223,047,291.00 Page 335. $58,126,368,674.27 today. The net income was $192,143,304.00 on $2,516,608,929.00 gross income. 7.6% The deficit was $66,713,797.00 on $706,438,362.00 gross income. 9.4%

What is classified as trade had a total number of tax returns of 5645 with a gross income of

$1,985,772,972. Only 61.6% of that generated by manufacturing. The net income was 2.9% on $1,638,207,502.00 gross. The deficit was 4.5% on $347,565,470.00 gross.

What we call finance (banking, insurance, real estate, holding companies, stockbrokers, etc) had 3112 tax returns for a total gross of $676,368,482.00. Only 21% of that generated by manufacturing. The net was 9.5% on $545,232,783.00 of gross income, so equivalent to manufacturing. But the deficit was only 2.7% on $130,135,699.00 of gross.

Thus, the order of involvement in the top three enterprise groups is: Trade, Manufacturing and Finance. Finance being the most profitable or safest to take part in? The total gross income of Massachusetts reported was $6,941,816,865.00. Trade was 28.6% of this. Finance was 9.7% of the total gross income. Manufacturing was 46.4% of the total gross income. (page 310)

Via the BEA: As of 2024, all manufacturing 77,245.6 billion is only 12.3% of Massachusetts total GDP. If the CPI factor is correct, then in all these years manufacturing income only grew 32.9% in 97 years.

Trade (retail/wholesale) is 8.4% of Massachusetts total GDP. Even trade has not kept up with Massachusetts GDP growth. Finance is 21% of Massachusetts total GDP. A classification not in the old 1927 report is Professional and Business services. This sector is 22.5% of Massachusetts GDP. So, Finance and Professional/Business services almost total what manufacturing used to.

97 years of an economy shifting as what happened in Massachusetts is not going to be reversed with tariffs. Also, immigrants and immigration did not cause this change. How we voted over the years caused this change. What has happened in Massachusetts I am sure is what the rest the nation has experienced. But sure, keep believing like the ending in Miracle on 34th Street. I believe, I believe…