GAO: EV Infrastructure: USPS Plan for Potential Workplace Charging
GAO: Electric Vehicle Infrastructure: USPS Should Plan for Potential Workplace Charging – Save the Post Office
Part of the plan as referred to in Steve Hutkins’ “EVs and S&DCs: USPS says you can’t have one without the other” was to have EV charging capabilities at the local post offices which would be available to the Post Office, USPS workers and also the public. As provided by Congress, funding was targeted for all three capabilities and not just for the Sorting & Delivery Centers (S&DCs). The later being an unpopular Louis DeJoy plan to have mail carriers pick up mail at the centers. Post Master General DeJoy also had it in mind of 90% of the new USPS fleet would be petroleum driven. That has reverted to EVs. And now the question is where the chargers will be located.
President Biden and much of Congress have it in mind to have the chargers at the local Post Offices. Funds were being provided with such in mind. There is a GAO report on the ability and functionality of doing both.
GAO: The United States Postal Service’s (USPS) facilities, such as post offices, could potentially provide the public and postal employees with electric vehicle chargers. For example, publicly accessible chargers could serve community members without a charger at their home. Additionally, five of the 13 stakeholders GAO interviewed said employees would most benefit from chargers at USPS facilities, given the time available to charge a personal vehicle during a work shift.
However, hosting chargers for the general public would pose significant challenges and provide relatively few benefits to USPS, according to USPS officials and stakeholders whom GAO interviewed. For example, USPS officials said hosting public chargers could be at odds with USPS’s goal of moving customers in and out of a facility quickly. Moreover, USPS is generally prohibited from offering nonpostal services, and officials said addressing challenges could require significant resources. In light of these and other challenges, USPS has not pursued chargers for the general public. Stakeholders GAO interviewed also recognized these challenges, but a few noted potential benefits for USPS, including improving USPS’s reputation on environmental issues and enhancing its relevance.
USPS is preparing to introduce electric vehicles into its delivery fleet and is planning to install chargers for these fleet vehicles. However, USPS has not fully incorporated the potential for employee workplace charging into these plans. USPS has taken some initial steps to explore the potential for employees to charge their own vehicles at work. These steps include designating leadership and surveying some employees on their interest. USPS officials said there are complex issues USPS would need to resolve before it could establish a workplace charging program, such as developing policies and potentially negotiating work rules with multiple employee organizations. However, the facility assessments USPS has developed in planning to install fleet chargers have not examined the potential for sharing fleet chargers with employees, or for installing additional chargers for employees’ use. Department of Energy (DOE) guidance encourages agencies to plan for long-term needs when installing chargers. Incorporating the potential need for workplace charging into current planning activities could spare USPS the expense of modifying facilities in the future.
EVs and S&DCs: USPS says you can’t have one without the other, Angry Bear, angry bear blog
Not thinking this is a sound idea as EV still has significant tech maturity ahead of it, and that includes charging process. But if they are determined to try it, thinking partnerships with local EV fleet operators would be much more manageable than general public. The property management firm with 7 EVs; the three closest parishes with 8 EVs. Give them a decent chance to hit utilization targets on a mostly scheduled basis with a fairly limited amount of commercial accounts. Big fleets are almost certain to have their dedicated charging, although they might take a fractional interest…..pay a monthly fee for some amount of access. General public just too many chances to get bad results: lady with 2 screaming kids “we can squeeze you in in about 2.5 hours”. Card declines causing friction. Etc.
The company I retired from put in a charger for the use of employees. Their electric bill was 3 million a month when I worked there, so this was not all that generous, but it was there. Every 3 or 4 months the company newsletter has a blurb about making sure you move your car when it is charged so that others can use the charger.
I pass Tesla charging stations and other public chargers fairly regularly. The Tesla station gets the most use, but only once has it ever looked full, that was the evening on a long weekend Friday. The others have a car occasionally – once the 4 car station had two. Over my random passing by, most of the time both types are fully empty, even though I see a lot of Teslas and quite a few others on the road.