Do Voters Who Want ‘Change’ Really Care More About the Age of the Candidate Than About the Age of the Candidate’s Ideas? REALLY?
The Marco Rubio debate moment that worries Democrats: When Marco Rubio cast the election as a ‘generational choice,’ he took a page out of the Obama playbook to portray himself as the candidate of future. It could work.
— Title and subtitle of an article in today’s Christian Science Monitor, by Linda Feldman (via Yahoo Politics)
Yup. Voters are downright clamoring for a return to 1920s economic and social policies—which, point by point by point, actually is what he wants to do.
All those young voters who so enthusiastically supported Obama in 2008 are chomping at the bit, and the ones who have turned 18 since then are so gullible that they think a 44-year-old Ronald Reagan/George W. Bush on steroids is the real candidate of change because, well, y’know, he’s 44.*
So what the Democrats should do, I think, is nominate a 43-year-old Communist Workers Party candidate if one were to run.
I mean … whatever.
Maybe some major polling organization will test out this theory that the age of the candidate rather than the age of the candidate’s ideas is what matters to voters, by including a question about it in its next survey. The margin of error would be 30 years—the difference in the ages of Marco Rubio and Bernie Sanders.
Seriously, of all the asinine canards that political consultants and political journalists sell, this surely rates among the most transparently ridiculous. Although maybe it didn’t really matter after all that Obama ran in 2008 not merely as the youngest candidate but (except for John Edwards) the most progressive. Or maybe people thought John McCain was the progressive.
Yeah. That’s it. People thought John McCain was the progressive.
And they think Elizabeth Warren’s and Bernie Sanders’ ideas are old hat.
*Sentence typo-corrected 11/11 at 6:15 p.m.
Although she doesn’t mention Rubio’s age, so maybe it’s not such a terrific piece. Doesn’t she know that Rubio is 44 years old?
Added 11/11 at 7:03 p.m.