…without having to identify specific revenue losses. The purpose of the rule was to reduce compliance burdens on small local governments, and it is apparent that the rule is having…

…this is a distinction without a difference. Why doesn’t the Senate change its rules ? Again, in theory, it takes two thirds of the Senate to change a rule, while…

…law unconstitutional, but Congress could have the power to overrule the Court).  These are not just theoretical possibilities.  As Belkin and Tushnet note, “other healthy and robust democracies do not…

…went something like this: Medicare proposes increasing payment rates by next to nothing. The affected stakeholders scream bloody murder in comments to the proposed rule. Medicare issues a final rule…

…supremacists were consolidating an authoritarian regime that would rule the South for generations, declared that Congress had done too much to protect Black people and that they should no longer…

…Business v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (2022), the Court had used similar logic to strike down OSHA’s temporary emergency rule directing large businesses to require…

…remains positive for the economy as to the next few months. Finally, as we await tomorrow’s jobs report, here is our last update as to the May Sahm rule indicator:…

…experts and into those of judges. During oral arguments, the liberal justices stated the overturning of Chevron would turn the Supreme Court into “a policymaker by majority rule.” The justices would rule on…

…and Ketanji Brown Jackson, is a masterwork of alarm and despair. “A rule of judicial humility,” she wrote, “gives way to a rule of judicial hubris.” The justice pulled no…

…and racial gerrymandering easier, undercut business regulation, ceased to recognize the constitutional right to abortion, and, stunningly, ruled that a president has significant immunity from prosecution for committing crimes while…