Giving to the Ultra-Rich Through Tax Breaks
Talking politics here and probably rightfully so. Tax relief for the wealthy and kicking people off of Medicaid to fund those breaks will not go over big. It appears there is plans to cut Medicare also. Both cuts will be for funding tax breaks for wealthy in income. The highest 10% will average an ~ $14,000 tax break.
“Trump’s Big Ugly Law Gives to the Ultra-Rich via Tax Breaks,” House Budget Committee Democrats
President Trump’s Big Ugly Law kicks more than 15 million people off health insurance (Medicaid), makes the largest cuts to nutrition assistance in history, and makes higher education less affordable. Why? To pay for tax cuts that overwhelmingly benefit the ultra-rich.
Non-partisan analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) shows that the bill worsens inequality, gives the ultra-rich a historic tax break, and makes working people worse off. Adding insult to injury, when including the cost of debt service, CBO finds that this bill adds over $4 trillion to the national debt.
CBO analyzed the combined effects of the tax policies and spending reductions and found that working families will experience a net loss in household resources, while the ultra-rich will get richer. Briefly:
- Families already struggling to make ends meet lose the most. Households in the lowest income decile, making $24,000 a year or less, lose about $1,200 every year, mostly due to deep cuts to Medicaid and food assistance. That amounts to over 3 percent of their total income, a devastating hit for people who can afford it the least.
- Everyone in the bottom twenty percent of the income distribution, or those making less than $43,000 a year, will see a net decline in household resources.
- Middle-class families get next to nothing. For those in the 5th and 6th decile, or the middle of the distribution, they will experience a resource gain of only 0.8 to 1 percent. That is barely enough to keep up with rising costs due to President Trump’s reckless actions.
- The ultra-rich get a windfall. Families making over $700,000 a year will see a $13,600 boost, almost entirely from tax cuts. That figure does not even count the massive estate tax giveaways for the ultra-rich.
Tr__p’s Big Ugly Law gives the ultra-rich a massive tax cut
JCT separately estimated the distributional effects of only the tax provisions in the bill. They found working-class people get no tax cut. In some cases a tax increase, while the ultra-rich get tens of thousands in tax cuts a year. Specifically:
- An average household making less than $15,000 a year will see a tax increase of over 9 percent in 2027. By 2033, when many temporary provisions in the tax portion of the law expire, this group will experience a 56 percent tax increase.
- While people earning $40,000 a year will see an average tax decrease of only $393, worth a few weeks of groceries, people making over $1 million a year will see their taxes go down by $97,000 in 2027.
Tr__p’s Big Ugly Law sets a new precedent for wealth transfers to the ultra-rich
In 2017, Trump and Republicans passed the so-called Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), a historically bad bill which increased the deficit by $1.9 trillion. The bill gives massive handouts to the ultra-rich. However, the Big Ugly Law makes the 2017 tax breaks for the richest few look small by comparison. Meanwhile exploding the deficit by more than twice as much.
- The TCJA gave people making over $500,000 a year an average tax cut of $35,000 the first year after enactment. By comparison, the Big Ugly Law will give people making over $500,000 a tax cut of $47,000 in the first year alone.
- The TCJA transferred a total of $36.9 billion dollars to people making over $1 million a year in just the first year after the bill was enacted. The new bill will more than double that number, giving people making over $1 million a year $114 billion in tax cuts for 2027 alone.
- While the TCJA worsened inequality, it gave very modest tax cuts (around $20 dollars a year) to the lowest income earners. The Big Ugly Law will ask the lowest earners to pay higher taxes every year.
- Because this bill is coupled with spending cuts intentionally targeting working Americans. On net, the bill is even crueler and more unequal than TCJA.
The impact of Trump’s bill and retaining the 2017 tax breaks? It will impact more than 15 million who will lose healthcare, millions of others will lose food assistance, additionally $3.4 trillion will be added to the deficit ($4 trillion when interest is included), ~$500 million in cuts to Medicare (CBO), and 760,000 manufacturing and energy jobs eliminated.
“Trump’s Big Ugly Law,” House Budget Committee Democrats


And yet they either do not vote or vote for the GOP in sufficient numbers that the GOP can continue to promote income/wealth inequality. It is almost like they like being serfs.
Terry:
I am not sure what will get them going. For the poor white, it is always good to have another level of poor below them. Whether it is single moms or Black and Hispanic Americans. They seem to lose sight of their being part of this very same group.
They still have their place on the ladder and do not seem to realize they can do better if they join forces and agree they are in the same boat as others. Still the myth of some old lady or minority gaming the system using rheir gains to gamble at a casino. Much is in how you look to others.
@Bill,
Exactly. LBJ nailed this:
“If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”
~ Lyndon B. Johnson
Joel:
I am happy you, Terry, Eric, and others hang around me. You remember what I have forgotten over the years. What I remember is what I see and which makes sense.
Thank you for adding the history and person to my thoughts.
“Transfer” is an odd word to use about people’s income not being taken by the Treasury as income tax. The numbers are what they are, and that’s important for consideration, but the attitude is also something to consider.