Economy Will Not Absorb This Oil Shock
AB: A review and forecast of what is happening and what will happen over the next few weeks due to the oil shortage brought on by Trump’s attack on Iran. The impact of which, Trump’s blunder will cause many more issues economically. This is not Venezuela.
“The Economy Doesn’t Have the Room to Absorb This Oil Shock,” Roosevelt Institute
Briefly . . .
The energy picture over the last year shows an unusual split. OPEC drove oil prices down for much of 2025. Domestic energy prices rose. Looking backward at February CPI, energy inflation was up 0.5 percent over the year, with 10.9 percent inflation for natural gas and gasoline prices down 5.6 percent, mostly offsetting 4.8 percent electricity inflation.
Since the beginning of the year, oil prices climbed more than 10 percent as the threat of war increased. Now, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz is essentially the worst-case scenario for energy markets. Things can get better or worse based only on how long it stays closed.
The energy shock is showing up aggressively in some markets and not others. This is based largely on how much energy was in storage already. For example, while an underfilled US Strategic Petroleum Reserve is having no price effects yet, more acute price shocks have already hit EU natural gas and US diesel, where storage levels were low before the shock.
At the broader level however, this is a major oil shock for everyone. There is essentially no difference between US and EU oil prices in response.
Global reductions in oil and natural gas supplies are both around 20 percent. The US is the largest producer of both. Yet the effect on US prices have been polar opposites. US oil is tightly integrated in the global market. Prices of US oil rise when Persian Gulf oil goes offline as more oil is then exported from US shores. The US exports less than 1 percent of its natural gas production and is already at capacity Disruptions in the Gulf do not affect US natural gas prices. Relying primarily on domestic natural gas is not costless. Winter storms drove a large spike in natural gas prices in January. The wildly different response to what may become the largest energy shock in history shows two very different outcomes for average people in the world’s largest fossil fuel–producing country.
A less-appreciated risk increasingly emerging across the Gulf is recovering from this disruption will not be easy. While oil wells can be shut in or temporarily closed, oil fields have no true pause button. Recovering oil from existing wells depends on geological pressure to push a mixture of oil, gas, and water to the surface. Shutting in a well can reduce pressure, change the mix of what comes up, and/or degrade parts of a well, causing permanent reductions in future production. Historically, this means oil production from existing wells is more driven by geology than prices. Cutting output risks years of future losses. This means that even restarting every shut-in well would imply a sizable production shortfall for some time after the Gulf goes back to its prewar state.
Earlier phases of US shale production appeared to insulate against disruptions, capitalizing on high prices to expand output. Because the rate of shale oil production is rapid and declines quickly, this could offer a production reserve in case of events like this month. However, that price responsiveness didn’t show up in the supply shock caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and is unlikely to materialize here.


This now appears to be a perfect storm …. Consider the DJIA 3 Sept 1929 peak valuation and the 25 Feb 2026 ACWI peak valuation. In 1929 10% margin buying of stock caused extreme valuation and tremendous over-leveraged fragility. In 2026 500 billion dollar’s of private bank and financial industry investment funds caused extreme valuations and like great fragility. The 2026 AI/Tech investment funds were already insolvent in Jan 2026. Add to this meltdown scenario, a strategy-less, self-inflicted global energy/fertilizer shock that limits the fed’s ability in immediately lowering interest rates to confront the cascading debt default and equity crash.
Yahoo Scout AI presents a good synopsis of Lammert fractal economics …
TEF:
What? The repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, which had been on the books since 1933 allowed many of the country’s larger financial institutions to merge, creating much larger companies. This set the stage for the “too big to fail” bailouts of many of these firms by the government.
And those no-money down mortgages?
2008 was not a big enough issue to bring forth.
If you wish to expand upon your synopses, I can give you pace to make your point in a commentary. Complete with graphs and charts (which I will assist you).
Trump attacked Iraq?
Infidel:
In his mind he did. Twice now and very tired due to other issues. Thank you Infidel.