Successful in a Primary? Don’t expect the Right Wingers Will Let you Pass . . .
Bit of a rewrite . . .
Democratic socialist who would become the first Muslim to be NYC mayor if elected. He first has to get past the right-wingers who have come out of hiding since Zohran Mamdani’s success in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor. Being a Democrat is one thing. Being of a different origin other than white is quite another. Even White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller and architect showed up commenting see what happens when you do not control migration (paraphrase).
All the critters have come out to attack and degrade Zohran. I hope he wins. NYC makeup is of good people.
~~~~~~~
Zohran Mamdani faces barrage of Islamophobic attacks after New York City Mayoral Primary Success.
Far-right activist and White House whisperer Laura Loomer posted on X:
“there will be another 9/11 in NYC” under Mamdani’s leadership, while the New York City councilwoman Vickie Paladino described him as a ‘known jihadist terrorist’ and ‘communist’ in a radio interview, calling for his deportation despite his American citizenship.”
“’Hamas terrorist sympathizer’, ‘jihadist terrorist’”, calls for deportation and predictions of another 9/11 – these are among the torrent of Islamophobic attacks that have erupted across social media and conservative political circles following Zohran Mamdani’s success in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor.
The 33-year-old state assembly member is a democratic socialist, who got his starts working for a new york online casino, and who would eventually become the first Muslim mayor of America’s largest city, He has been the target to a barrage of death threats and xenophobic rhetoric from prominent Republican figures and online activists since his primary win became apparent.
The coordinated nature of the attacks, spanning grassroots activists and senior political figures, reflects how anti-Muslim sentiment intersects with broader political divisions. Those targeting him have seized on Mamdani’s immigrant background and Muslim faith alongside his hyper-progressive positions to frame his potential mayoralty as a civilizational threat.
Senior Trump administration figures have joined the pile-on, including White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller and architect of mass deportations claiming: “NYC is the clearest warning yet of what happens to a society when it fails to control migration.” The New York representative Elise Stefanik, Trump’s one-time pick for UN ambassador, sent fundraising emails branding Mamdani a “Hamas terrorist sympathizer” before the race was even called.
Donald Trump Jr amplified a post reading, “I’m old enough to remember when New Yorkers endured 9/11 instead of voting for it,’ adding: ‘New York City has fallen.’”
Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene posted an AI-generated image of the Statue of Liberty draped in a burqa, while conservative commentator Matt Walsh lamented on how the famously immigrant New York isn’t “an American city anymore” because of its population being 40% foreign-born.
For longtime observers of American politics, the ferocity of the attacks may be shocking but their themes are depressingly familiar, especially after the 9/11 attacks. The playbook targeting Mamdani – questioning loyalty, invoking terrorism and weaponizing faith – has been deployed against Middle Eastern and Muslim candidates and officials for nearly two decades – such as with former Minnesota congressman and the state’s current attorney general, Keith Ellison, in 2006 – with predictable regularity.
“Many of the trends we are seeing mirror common Islamophobic content- Muslims as other and as a threat,” Council on American-Islamic Relation (Cair) research and advocacy director Corey Saylor told the Guardian. Saylor warned this could become a “larger issue, much like the Park 51 project did back in 2010”, referencing the controversy over the proposed Islamic cultural center near Ground Zero that sparked nationwide Islamophobic sentiment.
Cair said it doesn’t track Islamophobic incidents online, but that the volume of xenophobic posts on Mamdani’s primary is “noteworthy”.
At a time when political violence on the whole is on the rise, Mamdani has reported multiple death threats, including voicemails threatening to blow up his car in the final stretch of his campaign. The NYPD’s hate crimes taskforce is investigating the incidents, one of which referenced the explosive pagers used in Israel’s recent attack on Hezbollah members in Lebanon.
His campaign had upped his security detail over the last few weeks in response to the threats, and the scale of hatred has also taken a deeply personal toll on Mamdani.
“I get messages that say the only good Muslim is a dead Muslim. I get threats on my life, on the people that I love,” Mamdani said last week while holding back tears. “My focus has always been on making this a city that’s affordable, on making the city that every New Yorker sees themselves in.”
Trump also weighed in on Wednesday, calling Mamdani a “100% Communist Lunatic” while criticizing his appearance and voice. And despite notably steering clear of overt language about Mamdani’s religion and ethnic background, he again called Senator Chuck Schumer a “Palestinian” as a slur.
The attacks represent a broader pattern of Islamophobic targeting throughout the primary campaign. Interviewers repeatedly pressed Mamdani on Israel-Palestine issues while giving other candidates more latitude – including demanding his stance on Israel’s right to exist when candidates were asked which foreign country they’d first visit. Mamdani said he would remain in New York and that Israel should be a state of equal rights for all.
Speaking on MSNBC about the attacks, Mamdani reflected on their broader impact: “I’ve spoken to many Muslims across this city who have shared that their fear of having to be essentially branded a terrorist just by living in public life is one that keeps them preferring life in the shadows, life outside of that specter. And this is not the way that we can have our city be. It’s not the way that we can have our country be.”

It’s not just Republican Right Wingers who won’t let Mamdani pass. Democrats stay at a respectful distance after Mamdani cruises | Semafor
Ever since Bill Clinton brought the New Democrats to power, both parties have feasted at the same corporate trough.
“It’s Time for the Democrats to Throw Off the Dead Hand of Clintonism” The Dead Hand of Clintonism | The Nation
John:
I am going to feed your fire a bit:
What do you see occurring here? Be back in a bit.
Hamas has been recognized as a terrorist group under Democratic and Republican administrations. Mamdani could clearly say this and urge Hamas sympathizers to not vote for him. He certainly does not deserve death threats, but he and his supporters are too cute if they think a man of political maturity would publicly support globalizing the intifada and then seemingly being offended by the gut-level reaction that millions are going to feel towards him. It’s baloney to pretend that that is in any way normal. He knew it is language perceived as anti-Semitic by very large numbers of people and equally understands that a good slice of folks that use the phrase are anti-Semitic. The denunciation of political figures for more tenuous verbal associations is quite routine. If he doesn’t want to be thought of as a Hamas sympathizer he has chances to demonstrate it clearly. Political life isn’t for the faint of heart and he will be judged by his choices.
Ah, Eric. I see you’ve been reading and believing the Cuomo, GOP and Fox propaganda about Mamdani. You appear to believe it’s his job to fight the lies being told about him. You can’t bring yourself to blame the liars.
How sad for you.
I expect that you are going to repeat your argument that if only more voters had turned out, Kamala would have won. However, the New York Times reports a Pew study that indicated that: If Everyone Had Voted, Kamala Harris Still Would Have Lost – The New York Times
“As traditionally Democratic voters soured on their party, some decided to show up and vote for Mr. Trump and others simply decided to stay home. But if they did show up, polling data suggests they would have voted for Mr. Trump in surprising numbers.”
The question Democrats have to ask themselves is why enough Democratic voters soured on their party to hand victory to Trump. Was it poor messaging? Was it a flawed candidate? Or was it kitchen table issues?
I vote for “it’s the economy, stupid” and how many voters are facing increasing issues with affordability at a time when the economy was “great” (at least for the top 10%, whose incomes correlate with GDP growth.)
Kamala Harris got a tiny fraction more of total voters than Hillary Clinton did. Trump picked up an extra 4% over his 2016 performance. I would guess a lot of those votes were from Libertarians and Jill Stein supporters in 2016. Registrations and turnout were up by the same 2% in 2024 vs. 2016. It looks like Biden benefitted from a big bump in turnout but only a little in registrations.
Biden looks like the result of the existing electorate expressing their repugnance for Trump after his first term. Trump’s second term looks like the more extreme ends of the electorate choosing him over Harris instead of voting 3rd party.
There may be some Democrats who soured on their party, but probably not enough to give Trump his win. My opinion only.
Well John:
The numbers are not there to point in such a direction. It is apparent what direction they point in. University of Chicago had a different idea of what occurred in 2024. I am not going to post the content here. It is a reading assignment for you. I suspect there is some logic to their thoughts. They include such in their commentary. The Economy Has Been Great Under Biden. That’s Why Trump Won
Exit polls showed that 81% of voters favored Trump on the economy.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/interactive/2024/exit-polls-2024-election/
Jaimie Galbraith: “W hat did happen under Biden was a decline in real incomes—in household purchasing power. Prices had risen sharply in 2021–22, and even though the inflation rate was transient—contrary to screams from economists—the change in price levels was not. Wages struggled to catch up. Many people living on savings and pensions never did. While the White House moved quickly to bring down gas prices with oil sales from the Strategic Reserve, it did little to stop firms from padding their margins. Profits surged, as did rents, land prices, and the stock market. The Biden economists had overlooked a fundamental fact, which is that the ultimate benefit of any “stimulative” policy flows to those with market power—to land and to capital—regardless of how it may be distributed at first…
Democrats have come to depend on funding from oligarchs—in banking, technology, entertainment, and other elite sectors. Votes, however, must still be gathered from low-income (and especially minority) communities, who form a large part of what is called the American “working class.”
https://www.thenation.com/article/economy/bidenomics-failure-inflation-voters/#google_vignette
Galbraith acknowledges the role of differential turnout and can’t prove that economic dissatisfaction was the deciding factor, but he makes a good case for it. Democrats ignore working class economic concerns at their own peril. Mamdani prioritizes those very same issues, and you can see the chilly reaction from the ne’er-do-well, oligarchs-funded Democratic elites.
We already covered why prices went up. I am not going to go over it again because you know what happened during the Covid pandemic as well as I do. You are arguing just to argue.
I have a number of thoughts. The right hates Mamdani because he is a socialist populist, but attacks him because he opposes the genocide in Gaza, is not Christian and is an immigrant. If he was not running for mayor of a major city, I imagine they would pummel him for being a socialist, but major cities are by definition social places–people who can not stand the idea of living in a society where everyone counts do not live in major cities. Will the right’s attacks work? I hope not,but time will tell. I also do not expect that if he does win he will be able to make the city more affordable but would love to be proven wrong.
I still do not know how Harris lost–she was qualified, destroyed Trump during their one debate, and had a much more populist list of policies than the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025. She was a woman and one of color and that clearly hurt her with young men including young men of color, but I do not believe Pew’s analysis that if there had been better turnout Trump would have won by more–people who did not vote may not have voted for Harris but I do not think they would have voted for Trump.
I also question Galbraith’s statement that real incomes declined because of the inflation after the pandemic. I know that for working people real wages have been stagnant since the late 1970’s but I seemed to recall that even with inflation they increased modestly during Biden’s term. No doubt in my mind that they will be falling soon under Trump’s policies.