Prices and unemployment – Up. The rest of the economy adjusting downward
Some old guy handed over a damaged economy in January. The economy was definitely in a failure mode.
The economy is heading into very bad weather. Brace yourselves.
“Prices and unemployment are heading up. Everything else is going down,” Robert Reich
Today, the Federal Reserve decided to leave interest rates where they are, at 4.25 percent to 4.5 percent. Although the Fed acknowledged that the labor market was still “solid,” it also noted that “risks of higher unemployment and higher inflation have risen.”
Recall that last November, the single biggest reason voters gave in exit polls for choosing Trump was that he’d bring prices down.
Last Saturday, 25 percent tariffs on auto parts came into effect (distinct from pre-existing tariffs on the imported autos themselves).
Every one of the 10 million cars built in the United States last year had at least some imported parts. So, the price of American-made cars is about to go up.
Tariffs will add an average of about $4,000 per car bought by Americans.
Not just cars.
Although Trump has scaled back some tariffs and paused others as he seeks trade deals with foreign nations, his tariffs are already eating into household budgets.
More companies are warning consumers that they’ll be raising prices as a result of the tariffs.
On Wednesday, Stanley Black & Decker said it had raised prices on its tools and outdoor products and will raise them again later this year.
Executives at Procter & Gamble (which makes everything from Tide detergent to Bounty paper towels) say they’ll likely increase prices to compensate for the higher tariffs.
Hasbro says the toymaker will “have to raise prices.” (This hardly means that children will have to make do with two dolls instead of 30, as Trump says.)
About 90 percent of durable baby and children’s products sold in the United States are manufactured overseas, mostly in China. That also means higher prices for families.
A new survey from the Dallas Federal Reserve shows almost 55 percent of Texas businesses expect to pass cost increases due to the tariffs on to their customers.
Tariffs will particularly hurt small businesses. They’re less able to pass the extra expenses onto consumers because they compete directly with other small businesses for every consumer dollar. And they have less cushion against economic downturns.
This bodes ill for American workers, since 80 percent of U.S. employment comes from small businesses with fewer than 500 workers. The likely result: higher unemployment.
Most price hikes and job losses will begin hitting his month.
But here’s the question: Will consumers and workers realize Trump is the cause? And if they do, will they remember this by the November 2026 midterm elections?

I always have liked Robert Reich, but I never believed that he was as bright as William Milberg. The PDF linked and excerpted introduction below was from 2008 (re: financial crisis), but still relevant with regards to how we got to where we are now. How we get out of this mess has little to do with Trumpian policy, but much to do with how in our time of intellectually vacant political elites (which with remembrance of Johnathan Swift seems redundant at any time) we came to elect a flimflam man as POTUS.
http://gesd.free.fr/milberg8.pdf
Shifting sources and uses of
profits: sustaining US
financialization with global
value chains
William Milberg
Abstract
This paper links the financialization of non-financial corporations to the extensive
development of global value chains by these corporations. The main focus is the US
and its offshoring in China. Financialization has encouraged a restructuring of
production, with firms narrowing their scope to core competence. And the rising
ability of firms to disintegrate production vertically and internationally has allowed
them to maintain cost mark-ups and thus profits and shareholder value even in a
context of slower economic growth. The resulting rise in the profit share has not
supported dynamic gains from offshoring as often predicted, since financialization
pressures have reduced fixed investment to allow for higher dividend payments,
share buybacks, M&A activity and other financial asset purchases. The paper
explores the sustainability of the global value chainfinancialization link and its
operation in other industrialized countries. The conclusion briefly considers the role
of the non-financial corporate sector in the face of the current financial sector
decline…
No. It’s not relevant. You’re changing the subject, misdirecting, again …
TB,
The linkage between trade deficits and financialization is how the rich have been getting richer and the rest poorer since the mix-60’s by a hair and since the mid-70’s by an increasingly wide margin. Prices are not the thing that is the root cause, but rather income distribution. Milberg gets this in a definitive and elaborate academic way in pure economic terms. Reich fundamentally understands these principles relevant to the “Wealth and Poverty” course that he teaches, but not in Keynesian academic concepts. Reich is a good guy, but his background is in law applied to political economics, public policy, and labor issues. He is a true believer in mainstream liberal economics, warts and all. Milberg is an honest Keynesian academic and as such a political outsider since US politics has no place for honest wisdom. It is all about winning the next election and the campaign finance to get it done. Realistically the dumbing down of America has left no place for the likes of William S. Milberg or for me for that matter.