About Time
About Time
Stacey Abrams on Biden’s leadership, Georgia’s election and challenging voter suppression, PBS New Hour January 21, 2021
Judy Woodruff:
And, in fact, what we saw in 2020 and at the end of the election, President Trump and the people who support him making almost the opposite argument, that too much has been done to go out and to make sure minority voters can vote, people who may not be citizens can vote, they claim.
How — I mean, there’s a wave of belief out there today that something went wrong in this election. They’re coming at it basically from the opposite direction.
- Stacey Abrams:
I wouldn’t put this in terms of opposite direction. I would put this in terms of truth and lie.
We know that it is true that voters have been purged from the rolls, thousands of whom should never have been removed. We know that there are communities that experience multihour lines, when communities that are better situated and whiter have a faster attempt and a faster capacity.
We know that the issues of voter suppression played out in plain sight when we saw state after state try to force people to go to the polls in unsafe conditions, rather than allowing them to use the safety of voting by mail.
Then you have the lies that were told by Donald Trump and by his adherents. We had more than 60 lawsuits where evidence could not be produced. We saw Donald Trump himself at the outset of his administration convene a voting fraud task force and dismantle it because they could not find proof.
There has been absolutely no proof of widespread voter fraud. It did not happen. And, this year, Republican leaders acknowledged that that was true.
And so the moment we create this false equivalence between voter suppression, which has been baked into our nation since its inception, and voter fraud, which largely in the 20th century and 21st centuries has been a figment of imagination, then we cannot give them equal time and equal measure.
We have to dismiss and push back against voter fraud, so we can focus on ensuring that every eligible citizen in the United States of America has the same ease of voting, no matter who they are, where they live, or the color of their skin.
New White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki on Biden’s first 100 days, PBS New Hour, January 21, 2021
- Judy Woodruff:
At the same time, you have — again, this is coming from Republicans, who are saying it’s all well and good, the president’s early days, but these first executive orders, what is it, 16, 17 of them, look like a wish list, a progressive wish list, something that doesn’t sound very much like the president’s outreach for unity.
If he — in other words, they’re saying, if he really wants to work with us, why is he putting such an agenda out there that we can’t go along with?
- Jen Psaki:
Well, I think the question there, Judy, is, what exactly are they opposed to? Do they not think there is a climate crisis, or do they not think — the critics, I should say, not all Republicans, far from it.
Do they not think that Americans should wear masks? I mean, you look at polling, and that’s not what it says.
So, I think the president’s outreach and success in engaging with members of the Republican Party is going to be judged by his words and by his actions. And that is going to be whether he can work with them, listen to them, hear from them, take feedback from them on legislation, and find a path forward.
But the executive actions that he proposed were what he felt are essential actions to take immediately to bring relief to the American people and overturn some of the most detrimental steps of the prior administration.
But he’s pretty confident there’s still a path forward with Republicans.
- Judy Woodruff:
One other thing, Jen Psaki.
And that is, the Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell, is saying today, late today, that he believes the impeachment trial for former President Trump should be delayed until the middle of February to give President Trump time to pull his defenses together.
Is President Biden prepared to see that wait?
- Jen Psaki:
Well, Judy, the president’s focus is primarily on the COVID relief package that he announced just a week ago. And that’s what he’s having conversations with members of both parties about.
We’re going to leave the mechanics and the timing and the process of how an impeachment trial will proceed to leaders in the Senate. And we’re certain that Senator McConnell and newly — new Leader Schumer are going to have some interesting discussions about that.
But we will leave them — we leave it to them to determine what the path forward is.
Hi Ken:
Somewhere here I wrote about Georgia’s voters being purged from the rolls since Kemp was the S.O.C before Brad Raffensprerger in 2017. Back then an ~100,000 voters were purged from the rolls. Follow that number up with what happen in 2020 when almost 200,000 voters were purged.
Many were minority voters.
I wouldn’t put this in terms of opposite direction. I would put this in terms of truth and lie.
Well, I think the question there, Judy, is, what exactly are they opposed to? Do they not think there is a climate crisis, or do they not think — the critics, I should say, not all Republicans, far from it.
Do they not think that Americans should wear masks? I mean, you look at polling, and that’s not what it says.
The point I’m trying to make is that we need to call these people who try to impose these ‘what aboutisms’, false equivalencies, . . . out. In 2016, Woodruff asked every chance for months, ‘what about the emails?’, accepting no explanation. The media can not be allowed to continue doing this.
For example, Jordan, my hero in ‘Liars and Their Lies’, needs to be called out for the constant lying, for representing a gerrymandered district, …; pushed back into his burrow each time he sticks his head out.
In the interviews, Abrams wasn’t going to stand for it. Neither was Psaki.
Good God Ken;
You are another like me. I read something which I know is completely BS, google the main phrase, and respond with the truth. Knickerbockers had a great song called “Lies.” Sorry, sometimes I am a bit dense.
well, i think i agree with all this, but i wonder if there wasn’t some way to manage voting in person safely. rather than forcing the vote by mail issue. there may have never been fraud in vote by mail, but from the man in the street perspective there easily could be… it is simply not transparent. we rely on the honesty of the government,,, but that is what is at issue.
related to this; i wandered into a conservative web site this morning genuinely conservative i think, not frothing right wing insanity. i learned:
there is way more written about politics that i can hope to read.
i am as easily fooled when i don’t know the facts as the next guy.
i don’t know the facts.
except about one important issue that no one wants to hear about, much less do anything about.
and.. i think i can often (not always) tell bad thinking when i see it. but there is so much out there that i can’t hope to see what if any of it rests ultimately on good thinking.
as for vote by mail… at bottom of my reason for this comment is the feeling that everyone rushes to have the same opinion as the rest of their party… and if there is creatie thining it gets lost in partisanship. which, perhaps, is the whole point. a people divided against itself can’t do much about its rulers.
Stacy Abrams nominated for Nobel
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/stacey-abrams-nobel-peace-prize_n_60181f55c5b622df90f59355
“creatie thining”
maybe it gets lost in the typos.