• About
  • Contact
  • Editorial
  • Policies
  • Archives
Angry Bear
Relevant and even prescient commentary on news, politics and the economy.
  • US/Global Economics
  • Taxes/regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Climate Change
  • Social Security
  • Hot Topics
« Back

Predictions on Republican Tax Cut and Elections 2018

run75441 | November 29, 2017 11:19 pm

Journalism
Politics

Bruce Bartlett: “Prediction–EVERY Republican senator will whore himself or herself to pass this tax monstrosity. They should all go to Hell.”

Bruce Bartlett: “Prediction–Democrats will stay home on Election Day 2018 because that’s what they always do best(last word is mine)”

Predictions

Tags: Bruce Bartlett, run75441 Comments (8) | Digg Facebook Twitter |
8 Comments
  • Denis Drew says:
    November 30, 2017 at 12:54 am

    I said it before but it’s worth saying again: If Republicans actually expect lower taxes to lead to higher revenue, why do they never expound on what we should do with all that extra money? And do they have in mind some “crossover point” at which they admit lower taxes will to lead to lower revenues?

    Be interesting to interrogate them on that crossover point, loudly and in public. :-)–

    Of course what will really happen when revenues dive is Republicans will scream bloody murder about the deficit and the “desperate” need to cut programs that assist lower income folks — instead of simply raising taxes back up to where they had been all along on higher income people. And then they can re-initiate the sham-cycle over (and over) again as many times as they can get away for it.

    Be interesting to interrogate the Republican party loudly and in public in advance as to what their response to lower tax revenue might actually be. :-O

  • little john says:
    November 30, 2017 at 10:39 am

    That’s funny. In October 2016 Bruce was handicapping Hillary’s chances to be re-elected in 2020.

  • Karl Kolchak says:
    November 30, 2017 at 6:01 pm

    I’m in Virginia and I plan to stay home. If I do go to the polls, it will be in an attempt to confine the odious Tim Kaine to the dustbin of history. Hopefully, a Berniecrat will challenge him in the primaries.

    • run75441 says:
      November 30, 2017 at 8:25 pm

      You will help elect a Republican just like many Dems elected Trump.

  • run75441 says:
    November 30, 2017 at 8:24 pm

    Bert:

    I am an X-Marine Sergeant and I tolerate a lot of shite. This is garbage. We all bleed alike. This is an extreme which I will not tolerate. Whatever your beliefs are they have not been justified. Good bye, I am trashing you.

  • sammy says:
    November 30, 2017 at 10:08 pm

    Trump just keeps on winning. Now the NFL is on it’s knees: http://www.breitbart.com/sports/2017/11/30/unconditional-surrender-nfl-gives-players-89-million-social-justice-spending-no-condition-anthem-protest-end/

    He promised he would keep on winning until we’re sick of winning. Not sick of winning yet.

    Oh yeah, market up +300 on tax cut. Hope it comes about.

    • run75441 says:
      December 1, 2017 at 12:17 pm

      Breitbart News? What a joke.

      Still living on an Obama economy and nothing has been done by Repubs to mutilate it yet. Even the rescission of the 2001/2003 tax breaks and the imposition of higher taxes on the richer in income has not slowed the economy. Again this disproves the time again and again tried false panacea of skewing tax breaks to the 1% of the household taxpayer making >$500,000 and thinking the economy will leap forward. It did not happen as Republicans planned and lied about in 2001. Indeed, even a tax increase on the rich in income by Obama did not slow the economy and it helped match revenues to deficit spending.

      And, when the tax cuts were scheduled to expire at the end of 2012, extending the high-income tax cuts in particular was projected to have almost no effect on economic growth.  The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated in 2012 that extending the high-income tax cuts would have boosted GDP by just 0.1 percent in 2013.[17]  Indeed, allowing the high-income tax cuts to expire after 2012 does not appear to have had any substantial negative impacts on economic growth, as proponents of the tax cuts had claimed, and the economy has continued to grow steadily since then.[18]  This is consistent with the broader empirical literature about taxes on high-income people and economic growth.  As one comprehensive review of the empirical literature by three leading tax economists found, “there is no compelling evidence to date of real responses of upper income taxpayers to changes in tax rates.”[19]

      Lets get back to the real reason behind this 2:1 proposed tax cut (when compared to the George Bush 31% tax break) to the 1% of the household taxpayers making >$500,000 annually in income. This has little to do with giving a tax break to the 1% and invigorating the economy. It is another McConnell, Trump, Republican effort to wipe the slate clean of any action taken by Obama. Obama increased taxes on the rich in income with the investment tax to fund the ACA and the tax increase coming from other taxes on capital gains and income with the sun setting of the 2001/2003 tax breaks. And yet, the economy keeps on going like the pink bunny. The only thing which might make the economy stumble is a tax break such as what McConnell, Ryan, and Trump propose skewing almost 66% of it to the 1% of the household taxpayers making >$500,000 annually and then paying for it with cuts in Medicare, Medicaid, and other programs impacting those of far less income. Capisci?

      The only line in your comment which I will not repeat here and being on topic is the last line. Automobile inventory is at a 13 year high water mark and that industry will slow down taking with it all of its suppliers. I expect the economy to slow especially with the Fed increasing rates.

  • EMichael says:
    December 1, 2017 at 8:33 am

    Time for some active editing, before it is too late.

Featured Stories

Macron Bypasses Parliament With ‘Nuclear Option’ on Retirement Age Hike

Angry Bear

All Electric comes to Heavy Equipment

Daniel Becker

Medicare Plan Commissions May Steer Beneficiaries to Wrong Coverage

run75441

Thoughts on Silicon Valley Bank: Why the FDIC plan isn’t (but also is) a Bailout

NewDealdemocrat

Contributors

Dan Crawford
Robert Waldmann
Barkley Rosser
Eric Kramer
ProGrowth Liberal
Daniel Becker
Ken Houghton
Linda Beale
Mike Kimel
Steve Roth
Michael Smith
Bill Haskell
NewDealdemocrat
Ken Melvin
Sandwichman
Peter Dorman
Kenneth Thomas
Bruce Webb
Rebecca Wilder
Spencer England
Beverly Mann
Joel Eissenberg

Subscribe

Blogs of note

    • Naked Capitalism
    • Atrios (Eschaton)
    • Crooks and Liars
    • Wash. Monthly
    • CEPR
    • Econospeak
    • EPI
    • Hullabaloo
    • Talking Points
    • Calculated Risk
    • Infidel753
    • ACA Signups
    • The one-handed economist
Angry Bear
Copyright © 2023 Angry Bear Blog

Topics

  • US/Global Economics
  • Taxes/regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Climate Change
  • Social Security
  • Hot Topics
  • US/Global Economics
  • Taxes/regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Climate Change
  • Social Security
  • Hot Topics

Pages

  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial
  • Policies
  • Archives