Rents are going through the roof!
Yves Smith at Naked Capitalism has just pointed to The unfairness of housing purchases through time. New Deal democrat and Barkley Rosser (at Econospeak) have pointed to problems with rental prices. NDd continues with this post, also pointing to Bill McBride at Calculated Risk…
by New Deal democrat
Rents are going through the roof!
Rent increases appear to be out of control. Median asking rent rose from $850 to $870 in the first quarter of 2016, and is up $71 from $799 YoY, an increase of 9%! This sets yet another record for rents.
Here is the graph of nominal median asking rents by the Census Bureau:
Here is an updated look at real. inflation adjusted median asking rents, which also set a new record:
Vacancies remain extremely tight:
Despite the ongoing stratospheric increase in rents, not enough multi-unit housing is being built. When the large Boomer generation hit adulthood 50 years ago, note how multi-unit construction quickly shot up to 1,000,000 a year, and remained above 400,000 almost continuously for 20 years thereafter, until the last Boomer hit adulthood:
Now here is the comparable look for the similarly large Millennial generation:
The increase has only been to the 400,000 level, and has been stuck in that neighborhood for 2years.
Renters are typically from the lowest 2 quintiles of the income distribution. The second lowest quintile has had the poorest record of income changes since the recession{
and that hasn’t changed as of the latest update from the Consumer Expenditure Survey released two weeks ago:
It has increasingly occurred to me that one reason we haven’t had a bigger kick of consumer spending from lower gas prices, is that it is all getting sucked up by rent increases.
That rents have been going through the roof is one of the most underreported important stories in the economy.
ADDENDUM: Bill McBride says “there are serious questions about the accuracy of this survey. …. The Census Bureau is investigating the differences between the HVS, ACS and decennial Census, and analysts probably shouldn’t use the HVS to estimate the excess vacant supply or household formation, or rely on the homeownership rate, except as a guide to the trend.”
Of course, the rate of increase in rents is exactly the trend. But for completeness’ sake, let’s compare Median Asking Rent with other similar measures.
The only other contemporaneous measure is “rent of primary residence” from the CPI report. It is a mean, not a median:
It has been rising at over 3% a year for the last 2 years — and MEMO TO THE FED! Housing is the only important sector that is showing any actual inflation. If there is a shortage of multi-unit housing, exactly how is raising rates going to help???
There are two other median measures in addition to median asking rent from the HVS : the American Community Survey (as noted by McBride) and the Consumer Expenditure Survey. Unfortunately the former has only been reported through 2014, and the latter through mid-2015. The below table shows their YoY increases, compared with median asking rent:
SURVEY: ACS CES HVS
2009 ——– (817) ——- —— (708)
2010 +2.9% (841) +1.4% +2.6% (698)
2011 +3.6% (871) +4.4% -0.6% (694)
2012 +2.1% (889) +5.2% +3.3% (717)
2013. +1.7% (904) +4.3% +2.4% (734)
2014 +1.8% (920) +9.2% +3.8% (762)
2015 —- —– +4.3%* +6.7% (813)
*June 2014-June 2015 all shelter
The CES through mid-2015 actually shows a bigger post-recession surge in rents than the measure of median asking rents. The ACS is more tame, but ends in 2014. When you also consider rents as measured by the CPI, it is pretty clear that rents are increasing faster than wages.
cross posted with Bonddad blog
There has been an incredible amount of multi-family going up in the Boston area in the last several years. The construction financing must have finally gotten unfrozen, because it’s just one after another. Somerville has put up what must be thousands of units between the area near the museum and assembly square. Boston has also put up hundreds just in the area of the Boston Herald former offices, and Olympics be damned, the politicians have been taking the idea of capping Widett Circle quite seriously to build a whole new neighborhood.
In Malden the entire downtown area and now down Eastern Ave has been under constant construction for a couple years, with “Luxury Apartment Homes” going up everywhere. The Masonic building is soon to undergo gutting and installation of more apartments and ground level shops to replace the now vacant shops below. Ground just broke on more apartments this last week or two. Single bedrooms are going for more than what we pay for our entire mortgage payment with real estate taxes and insurance plus our monthly utilities less than a block away from where we live, and Malden is considered an “affordable” area. The houses next to us are going out for sale at half a million, and we bought for about 300k in 2012 (the people across from us bought in years earlier for 400k or something and their boys just outgrew their place, but the family next door whose home is on the market have been there for a few decades, and I think they’re just retiring and downsizing some).
The market is astonishing in Boston.
@ J Goodwin,
Yes a boom of “luxury apartments” going on in Natick as well, plus two family condos in certain areas near downtown, as well as single family homes. But “starter homes” of 1000 square feet or less sell for 400k, and we are the lower end of property values compared to our next door neighbors. A lot of this is in the last 2 or 3 years.
Dan:
Ouch! 2500 sq feet, 3/4 acre, near a college town and we are at $350k.
While the shortage in multi family housing investment is certainly a factor, I think there is another large factor. The housing bubble.
Millions of families lost their homes and they are still not credit worthy to buy a single family home. Combine that with the “lessons” learned from the bubble, which include the obvious fact that buying vs. renting is a complicated decision based on a multitude of factors. I think we are finally seeing reality set in on a society where a couple of decades ago renters were looked down on.
So we have greater demand for rental units and less supply.
Even I can do that math.
Of course, renters are looked down upon. They supposedly do not pay “any” property tax. All the owners of the apartments do.
EMichael,
Take a look at Barkley Rosser post.
Dan,
I have. I beilieve there was a discussion of Barkley’s post on EV that I was in.
He certainly talks about low income people that couldn’t afford to buy a house and I agree with that.
I think this is something more than that. A foreclosure will keep people off the market for 10 years in the vast majority of cases. At the same time, I think the bubble caused people to better evaluate their buy/rent options.
I know when I grew up in the 60s almost every kid thought they would grow up, but a house, etc. I am thinking kids that grew up in the 90s had less of that kind of thought, and the disaster in the oughts have caused a sea change for those 30ish people in terms of the rent/buy decision.
“Ouch! 2500 sq feet, 3/4 acre, near a college town and we are at $350.”
Where on Earth do you live? With numbers like that I find it hard to believe that you’re anyplace close to civilization.
Thinking it is $350K
What surprises me is that no-one has posted this yet: