…consumer confidence, and a rising stock market. 2.2% growth is basically ok, closer to recession than to boom, but basically neither. It would take growth rates somewhat above 3% to…

…The average is $87,000 per beneficiary. Most of the firms acquired or financed are PCPs or MSOs that typically produce no margins—just an average take-home income of $240,000 per physician….

…year as well for these negative GDP outcomes, even as employment and income held up. But in fact this item is not precisely what its label says it is.  It…

…jobs and raise (not lower) government revenues. They didn’t. The Bush administration had anemic job growth, certainly seeing no boost from the humongous tax cuts enacted in 2001, 2003, and…

…argument: specious logic; ignorant confusion of correlation with causation; deliberate simple-mindedness; or even the “Donald Duck theory of economic growth“. Whichever label you choose, it is, unfortunately, also just par…

…been resilient in some ways, resilience for “the economy” is not the same as a deep sense of security and optimism for families. Growth in 2025 came in at 2.2 percent…

…expected to rise by just 6 percent to 13 percent over the next 10 years. Why so little? Many well-known factors work against the growth of American manufacturing, including shortages of appropriately…

…teaches various courses in the area of federal income tax, such as introduction to federal income tax, corporate taxation, partnership taxation, international taxation and perhaps in the future a course…

…freshwater economics, still claim that all we need to do is starve the beast more, cut taxes and regulations more and economic growth will take off and take care of…

…on capital income. Those provisions are most favorable for the wealthy who own most of the corproate stock and other financial assets. hough the right likes to label these kinds…