Know Nothings

“The New Know Nothings’ wrecking ball”

– by Merrill Goozner

Pictures from this weekend’s Stand up for Science at the Lincoln Memorial sent me scrambling for the history books. Thousands turned out to protest the cuts in science funding ordered by the New Know Nothings:

A president who declares global warming a hoax; a secretary of health who sees more harm than good in vaccines; and an unelected billionaire who uses a meat axe to pare global health programs.

The original Know Nothings sought electoral power in the late 1840s and early 1850s on an anti-Catholic platform aimed at demonizing and deporting millions of Irish and German immigrants. The Know Nothing name came from instructions that members say “I know nothing” if asked about the party’s secret rituals and violent assaults on immigrants. The party’s place in history gave the name a very different meaning.

The Lincoln Memorial was an appropriate place for the scientists’ protest against the new know-nothingism. The rise of the Know Nothings divided and eventually destroyed the Whig Party — then the opposition to the pro-slavery Democratic Party. It led abolitionists and free soilers like Illinois’ Abraham Lincoln to form the Republican Party to oppose slavery’s expansion. The resulting party realignment led to the Civil War.

“I am not a Know-Nothing. That is certain. How could I be?” Lincoln wrote to Joshua Speed in 1855. “How can anyone who abhors the oppression of negroes be in favor of degrading classes of white people?”

Big VHA cuts coming

The VA also provides sites for numerous clinical studies, often in collaboration with academic medical centers, that seek to improve veterans’ and the general population’s health. The VA, like other research sites, will bear the brunt of a decision made last week by the new leadership at the National Institutes of Health to terminate millions of dollars in research grants. The order was carrying out Trump’s executive order defunding anything related to diversity, equity, and inclusion.

‘We don’t need no stinkin’ 1st amendment’

I am just one of thousands of Columbia graduates (Journalism School, 1982) who received a very disappointing email letter from interim president Katrina Armstrong on Friday night. She wrote . . .

“We are committed to working with the federal government to address their legitimate concerns. To that end, Columbia can, and will, continue to take serious action toward combatting antisemitism. This is our number one priority.”

Slaughter of the Innocents

Since the Hamas slaughter of more than 1,200 innocent Israelis? More than 40,000 innocent Palestinians were killed in Gaza. The result of which were parking protests around the world against Israel’s tactics. Antisemitism is a real problem in our society. But anti-Zionist or even anti-Jewish speech is not a crime, no more than racist or anti-immigrant speech is a crime.

Yet Columbia threw the student chapter of Jewish Voices for Peace and Students for Justice in Palestine off campus for “threatening rhetoric and intimidation.” The New York Civil Liberties Union filed suit against Columbia for bypassing normal disciplinary channels and violating civil laws prohibiting disproportionate sanctions.

“This is not about antisemitism. It is about crushing dissent,” said Reinhold Martin, a Columbia historian of architecture and president of the university’s American Association of University Professors, or AAUP, chapter.

“And for those who take the Trump administration’s actions at face value, remember Charlottesville.” (Nazis: “The Jews will not replace us.” Trump: “You had some very fine people on both sides.”)

I will resume my small contributions to the J-school when a Columbia president makes defending freedom of speech as much a priority as defending the sensitivities of students offended by opposing views.

The domestic fallout from attacks on global health

Trump unilaterally withdrew the U.S. from the World Health Organization. Elon Musk’s department of government efficiency has all but destroyed the Agency for International Development, which in addition to fighting diseases around the world feeds information on infectious disease outbreaks to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Musk gleefully declares on his X platform (whose CDC account has been cancelled), the USAID has been “thrown it in the wood chipper.”

USAID’s Budget

“Much of USAID’s budget was devoted to addressing humanitarian and health crises abroad with the implicit goal of preventing these emergencies from reaching our own shores.” He wrote. “Americans are safer when instability and infectious threats are effectively managed on foreign lands.”

Spencer also reports that despite Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s promise that waivers would allow lifesaving work in Africa and other parts of the developing world to continue, “few have materialized.” The President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, established under George W. Bush and largely funded by USAID, is on pause. Since its founding in 2003, PEPFAR has saved more than 25 million lives. “More than 20 million people—500,000 of them children—were receiving HIV treatment through the program,” Spencer wrote.

Pandemic unpreparedness

Finally, the measles outbreak in Texas and New Mexico continues to spread. More than 200 people have been infected, mostly children, and at least two people have died.

What would Ben Franklin say about current research policies?

To sum up today’s news: The administration ended aid for overseas health organizations providing early earnings about infectious disease outbreaks. It all but eliminated staff that monitors new threats. Research into promising technologies has ended while support for new research into thoroughly debunked theories is expanding. A measles outbreak is rapidly spreading.