February JOLTS report confirms low hire, low fire, low quit economy
– by New Deal democrat
I normally don’t pay too much attention to the JOLTS report, and I won’t this month, either. It does break down the labor market further than the jobs report, and it does have several slightly leading components, so let’s at least take a brief look.
Below are job openings (blue), hires (red), and quits (gold) through February, all normed to 100 as of the onset of the pandemic:
Job openings seem to get the lion’s share of attention from most commentators, but I treat them as somewhat fictional. In any event, they came in at the 2nd lowest reading since the pandemic, although last month was revised significantly higher. But both actual hires and quits had their absolute lowest reading since the pandemic, and since they unlike openings are “hard” data, that is further confirmation of the poor monthly nonfarm payrolls we’ve been seeing.
Layoffs and discharges, on the other hand, remained near their lowest numbers of the past 12 months, although they did increase in January:
This is further confirmation of the extremely low level of new jobless claims we have seen since November, although as I have pointed out in the past, jobless claims are more leading and less noisy than these monthly layoff numbers.
Finally, the quits rate (blue) tends to lead the YoY gain in hourly nonsupervisory wages (red). First, here’s the long term historical graph:
And here is the post-pandemic close-up:
With quits falling to a new post-pandemic low, this suggests that wage gains will also be somewhat more attenuated in the next few months — not something we want to see while there is an oil shock-induced spike in inflation.
“December JOLTS report stabilizing at near stall speed, despite one negative “soft data” outlier,” – Angry Bear by New Deal democrat





Reflects what I’m hearing from my sons still in the trades, which doesn’t make sense: people are afraid to lose their job. OK, I get that but, with the ICE deportations a marked decrease in both skilled and construction labor should result in an increase of available jobs. Contractors should be paying top dollar to retain people like my son
And it could indeed be they just don’t want to pay for it, which dovetails with my theory of the minimum wage becoming a target wage: all anyone is willing to pay. But, buildings go up on contract, they don’t go up by themselves …
Ten Bears:
At a 1.6-replacement rate today and going into the future, there is and will be a shortage of Labor going into the future. They will be paying Labor more even without Trump’s efforts. He just made it worse.
@Bill,
The prophecies I’ve read are that AI will substantially replace labor in the next 20 years. If that’s true, then falling populations are good, since there will be fewer jobs.
Joel:
I am not quoting a prophecy (as in religion). A prophecy? A “message, revelation, or prediction believed to be divinely inspired or revealed by a prophet, often focusing on future events or expressing divine will.” Furthermore, we are being hit hard by the political impact of this administration to deport people who are here legally and illegally. This puts a strain on labor input which is enhanced by an aging of much of the population.
You are also talking 20 years out. AI may happen quickly. As an example, the last major change in manufacturing was going from manual machining saws, lathes, drill presses, etc. to NC, to CNC. etc. CNC doing multiple operations at one station.
“U.S. population growth declined from approximately 1.0% in 2024 to 0.5% in the twelve months ending June 30, 2025. This slowdown, driven by lower birth rates and reduced international migration, has produced immediate and quantifiable economic consequences.
A slower-growing population means a slower-growing customer base. In 2024, the U.S. added 3.2 million new residents. In 2025, that number dropped to 1.8 million, leaving a growth gap of roughly 1.4 million fewer people contributing to housing demand, retail spending, and service consumption.”
How Declining Population Growth is Breaking the U.S. Economy
@Bill,
Increasing unemployment due to AI also means a slower-growing customer base, lower demand and lower consumption unless the population shrinks proportionately.
As for “prophecy,” AI seems to have taken on the trappings of a religion, both in terms of belief and in terms of grift.
Joel:
In this instance we are identifying, people having fewer babies as the cause. AI may mean such in the coming future. Today, the nation is not reproducing in the same fashion. In 2006, the nation hit 300 million in population and was reproducing at 2.01. I had used that article “300 Million and Counting” then and going forward. Reproduction has dropped since then. There are articles out there claiming a lack of population growth could be problematic in the future.
I am not big on religion. Similar forecasts have stated automation would replace people too. Such has done so to some degree and such systems did have programming done. It still requires input. I am not saying AI will not happen. It will more likely will happen. I do not believe it will replace human labor input.
AI isn’t going to build houses …
@Ten,
True. AI isn’t going to buy houses, either.
To be fair ~ I have posted a couple videos of modern manufactured home manufacturing and there is a great deal that can be automated, with robotic arms and the computer code to operate them but it still takes human interaction at multiple points along the line
Ten Bears:
Both you and TEF could be right. I am just watching the numbers
On 27 Feb 2026, did US sovereign debt requirements, covertly, exceed the ability of the global macroeconomic GDP activity to support it?
A serious US and global recession pending? Yes…
From the Covid US sovereign debt interest rate lows and by fractal analysis, 27 Feb 2026 was a predetermined inflectional point for the US Sovereign Debt Market. On 27 Feb 2026, did US sovereign debt requirements, covertly, exceed the ability of the global macroeconomic GDP activity to support it?
On a conspiracy level … was Trump (and the timing of the Israeli-Trump war-crime war) picked – as the ultimate blundering, thoughtless, careless, clumsiest of all bulls-in-all-china-shops and as the supremely blindest of all narcissistic …. fall guys … by the people who exquisitely understand the global asset debt macroeconomic system? Those people desperately needed/need a fall guy to be clearly identified, highlighted, and blamed for a predetermined deterministic significant destabilization of US sovereign debt solvency …
[chuckles sardonically] there’s an older not unlike “conspiracy” theory
However you look at it it didn’t end well …