Real aggregate nonsupervisory payrolls remain relentlessly positive
– by New Deal democrat
Today is Presidents’ Day, so there are no official economic data releases; and there will be no significant releases tomorrow either, before a torrent of both timely and delayed data from Wednesday through Friday, including GDP for Q4.
In the meantime, because of the January updates for employment and inflation last week, one of my important series for forecasting purposes can be updated as well: real aggregate nonsupervisory payrolls.
To recap, this series represents the total amount of paychecks in the economy for all workers except bosses, adjusted for inflation. It is noteworthy not just because the data goes back 60 years, but because it make real world sense: if ordinary working families have less money to spend in real terms, they are likely to cut back spending, and that retrenching brings about a recession.
First, here is the entire historical series. Note it is presented in log scale, so that later data does not obliterate earlier data:
With the exception of the COVID lockdown recession, the series has almost always turned down shortly before a recession has begun; or at very least turned flat.
Here is the same data presented in a YoY fashion:
With the exception of the 2002 “double-dip,” real aggregate nonsupervisory payrolls turning negative YoY has been a perfect indicator of recession, and remaining positive has been a perfect indicator of expansion; and further has typically turned negative within 2 months of the data of onset.
Now here is the post-pandemic look at the absolute series:
The trend has been almost relentlessly higher.
And here is the YoY look:
Again we see that it has never been negative, indeed has never shown less than 1% growth during this entire period.
The one caveat is that because of the poor “shelter” kludge during the government shutdown, which suggested that rent and owners’ equivalent rent had only grown by 0.1% during those two months (vs. their typical 2025 average of 0.3%), the YoY total change should probably be between 0.2% and 0.4% lower, and that problem will persist through next October.
But even so, real aggregate nonsupervisory payrolls are sending an important signal that, despite virtually nonexistent job growth, wage growth has been strong enough to continue to power consumer spending, which in turn is negativing the onset of any recession in the next few months.
August real average wages and nonsupervisory payrolls: some signs of flagging but no recession signal yet,” Angry Bear by New Deal democrat





One piece of data that supports the idea that virtually nonexistent job growth is not a problem is the employment-to-population ratio for 25-54-year-olds, which is currently tied for its highest value since just before the dot-com crash, 25 years ago. It has been stable for years; in Feb. 2023, it was 80.5; in Jan. 2026, it was 80.9, and the low over those three years was 80.4. (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/lns12300060)
Sure, my daughter who graduated Magna Cum Laude from Univ. of Washington last June has not been able to find a permanent job (she’s working for Nevada Wildlife / Americorps on an 8 month program now), and my best friend who is a professor of management at a business school says last year was the worst year for hiring out of school that any of them can remember, but is any group other than new graduates really feeling a pinch? Given wage growth etc., it’s not clear to me (which is not meant as a “No”, it really is meant as an “I don’t know.”)
John,
I really don’t know enough to have an opinion, but I know inflation has hurt me badly, and lower interest rates are not helping and the stock market scares me. I suspect there may be factors we are not seeing here. On the other hand, maybe we are seeing the best economy in decades. Maybe a good time for a serious boycott of the companies behind the criminals.