Trump and the Car Tariffs
Some detail on Trump’s Car Tariffs. Still not a lot of detail. This is what was proposed. Even with a cut back in the tariff, prices will increase. The threat may and probably will make a great excuse for a price increase also. Oh, we brought this one in early so as to avoid the bulk of the tariff. Even so, this costs us money.
“Analysts: Trump Car Tariffs Could Crash the US Auto Industry,” Plastics Today
President Trump’s plan to impose 25 percent import taxes on cars and auto parts could cause “pure chaos” and a supposed “Armageddon.” My opinion? It will just blowup the economy as many people react in a negative manner. What next?
At a Glance
- Trump executive order levies 25% tax on all imported light vehicles.
- The tariff is estimated to add $5,855 to the price of the average new car.
- Higher prices will collapse US auto sales by 20 percent.
In a move that is disrupting the US auto industry, President Trump has signed an executive order imposing a 25 percent import tax on foreign cars and auto parts as he has long threatened. It is scheduled to take effect April 2, though previously announced tariffs have been paused before their effective date.
This would directly affect nearly four in ten new cars sold in the US, estimated Shoggi Ezeizat, senior analyst of consumer discretionary industries at Third Bridge. “~39% of new vehicles sold in the U.S. were assembled outside the country,” he wrote in a company report.
If these taxes on imported cars and parts do take effect, the result will be explosive for the auto industry, according to analysts. Trump’s stated intent is to incentivize carmakers to return auto assembly to US plants from the plants they operate in Canada and Mexico and to push foreign carmakers to locate even more of their production here.
An additional complication is the source of the components used in the cars, as United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA)-sourced cars will only be taxed on their non-US content and USMCA-sourced components may be imported from Canada and Mexico for use in US assembly plants tax-free. “Business is coming back to the United States so that they don’t have to pay tariffs,” Trump asserted during an Oval Office press conference.
“This tariff announcement (in its current form) would send the auto industry into pure chaos and raise the average price of cars between $5k on the low end and $10k to $15k on the high end,” wrote Dan Ives, global head of technology research at Wedbush Securities in a post on X.
While Trump’s stated intent is to support the US auto industry, this action will do more harm than good, both in the short term and in the longer term, Ives said. “Even US automakers that produce cars in the US have ~40%-50% of auto parts that come from abroad,” he pointed out. “A US car with all US parts made in the US is a fictional tale not even possible today.”
Trump’s goal is for them to stop doing that and to source those parts domestically, but if that is possible, it will take time. “In our view, it would take 3 years to move 10% of the auto supply chain to the US and cost hundreds of billions with much complexity and disruption” explained Ives. “The concept of this auto tariff in our view would be a back-breaker and Armageddon for the auto industry globally and throws the supply chain into pure panic mode.”
While the immediate pain will be felt by automakers and dealers, they will pass that pain along to consumers. “We believe this adds up to $100 billion of costs annually to the auto industry and will essentially get passed directly onto the consumer and clearly erode demand on Day 1 of tariffs,” concluded Ives. The winner in our view from this tariff is no one.”
While Ferrari immediately announced a 10% price increase on some models in response to the executive order, it is affordable cars that will be hit the hardest, according to Mark Schirmer, director of industry insights & corporate communications at Cox Automotive. “Significant tariffs focused on the auto industry will disproportionately impact our market’s most affordable vehicles,” he wrote in a LinkedIn post. “Our analysis suggests that 40% of vehicles priced under $40,000 will be directly impacted. Of new vehicles priced under $30,000 – there are 20 of them – 10 will be hit hard.”
Cox Automotive has crunched the numbers and estimates the average increase in price for new vehicles will be $5,855, or 16.6% of an average new-vehicle price, Schirmer said. “Will transaction prices increase by 16%? It’s hard to say. It is likely that not all the costs will be passed directly to buyers, but one reality is hard to ignore: Prices will go up for suppliers, for automakers, and for buyers. The impact on “affordable” vehicles would likely make many of them unviable in the U.S. market.”
Foreign automotive brands will, unsurprisingly, be hurt even more than domestic brands. “Volkswagen is the most at risk, with nearly 44% of its U.S. volume sourced from Mexico,” observed Ezeizat. “Toyota and Stellantis lean heavily on Canadian assembly, while GM, Nissan, and Mazda also depend on Mexican production.”
Companies that make the parts that are used to build cars will also feel the heat. “For Tier 1 suppliers, the tariffs are landing at a time when their negotiating leverage with OEMs is already weak,” he stated. “According to our experts, 20–30% of electronic content in typical components still comes from China, with tariffs likely to raise input costs by 10–20%. Mitigation isn’t feasible in the near term—re-sourcing even one component can cost $50,000 to $100,000 per program due to qualification and testing requirements.”
The result of these increased prices will be fewer sales. Bank of America estimates that US passenger vehicle sales will shrink by 20 percent, or 3.2 million vehicles in a base market of 16 million annual sales. Such a contraction of a major industry would be felt across the US economy. “30 years of free trade blown up,” fumed Cox Automotive’s Schirmer. “Unthinkable.”
Here is the text of the executive order:
Today, President Donald J. Trump signed a proclamation invoking Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to impose a 25% tariff on imports of automobiles and certain automobile parts, addressing a critical threat to U.S. national security.
- President Trump is taking action to protect America’s automobile industry, which is vital to national security and has been undermined by excessive imports threatening America’s domestic industrial base and supply chains.
- The 25% tariff will be applied to imported passenger vehicles (sedans, SUVs, crossovers, minivans, cargo vans) and light trucks, as well as key automobile parts (engines, transmissions, powertrain parts, and electrical components), with processes to expand tariffs on additional parts if necessary.
- Importers of automobiles under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement will be given the opportunity to certify their U.S. content and systems will be implemented such that the 25% tariff will only apply to the value of their non-U.S. content.
- USMCA-compliant automobile parts will remain tariff-free until the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), establishes a process to apply tariffs to their non-U.S. content.
- The President is exercising his authority under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to adjust imports to protect our national security.
- This statute provides the President with authority to adjust imports being brought into the United States in quantities or under circumstances that threaten to impair national security.


Since CArmageddon essentially is a further incentive for re-urbanization and mass transit, then I find myself once again empathetic with that I have so longed despised. In the immortal words of Pogo Possum, “We have met the enemy and they are us.” OTOH, cost of living for the bottom half of the income distribution is far more about food and shelter than a new car.
rc:
What? I will lose my jacked-up F450 which I use to bully people on the highway with everyday. I am only 5’8″; but I am big in that vehicle which is fuel efficient also at 10 mpg.
In the early 1970s, I was out of the USMC, married, and living in an apartment with my wife (still here after 54 years of suffering me). I was working in an office taking orders from customers. It dawned upon me a couple of months later, I was not going anywhere in this job. Back to school. Bought a used Datsun 510 ($500) to transport me the 40 miles each way back and forth. Just in time for the Arabs to limit our oil consumption. My 30 mpg was meager to what you can get today. It was the right vehicle for the right time. I would fill up near school rather than wait in the lines near Chicago.
Look, the fools elected this way-overweight, piece of white-trash garbage to lead them. I for one have no intention of going down with them. Question . . . Did you vote Ron? Did you vote for this piece of garbage or maybe you were amongst the ~6 million who did not vote or voted for others? The latter two gave Trump the election rather than those who voted for him. They did the same the first go around.
Bill,
Ever hear of the electoral college? If one cannot blame the Democratic Party for their own failure then one must find a convenient scapegoat.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election_in_Virginia
“…Before the election, most news organizations considered Virginia a likely win for Harris. On election day, Harris won Virginia with 51.83% of the vote, carrying the state by a margin of 5.78%, similar to the 2016 results.
This was the first presidential election in which both major party candidates received more than 2 million votes in Virginia. Trump is the first Republican to win the popular vote without Virginia since 1924. This is also the first election since 2000 where Virginia voted for the popular vote loser…”
((( YOU CHANGED THE SUBJECT AND YOU DIDN’T ANSWER HIS QUESTION )))
TB,
If one already knows the outcome of a state’s election and there is no way one’s vote could change it then not voting is not abdicating. I did not vote in 2024; but there was no question to be answered, but rather just an ignorant self-righteous vindictive remark.
rc:
Yeah, I know it is tough to register to vote. It is tough to go down to the assigned voting place and vote for a white woman or a woman of color both of whom are more intelligent than the present and heaviest president we have ever had in the US. You joined the, we do not like women as the president vote. This “If one already knows the outcome of a state’s election and there is no way one’s vote could change it then not voting is not abdicating.” is the most ridiculous remark I have ever read on Angry Bear.
Instead of saying to TB “I screwed up,” you cop out and joined the “we do not want a woman as the President discriminators.” Ron, how do you apologize for what Trump and his merry band of bigots, racists, misogynists, etc. are going to do to people they do not like or the nation for that matter?
Because you and millions of others felt my vote did not count, you did not vote. The millions of those who did not vote in both elections put Trump in office. The numbers are there.
I would have accepted, “I screwed up.” You are way to intelligent for that remark you made to TB.
” . . . heaviest president we have ever had in the US.”
Only the 3rd heaviest, behind Taft and Cleveland (and virtually tied with Teddy Roosevelt). Taft died at 72, Cleveland at 71. Trump is 78. A lot of that is genetics, but also healthcare for the wealthy is much better in the third decade of the 21st century.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1108096/us-presidents-weights/
Our town only has one car dealership. It sells Hondas and Toyotas. We had three dealerships when we moved here, but they could not survive. Anyone who doesn’t want a Honda or Toyota already drives 120 – 200 miles to buy their new car. 4 years from now that might be everyone.
Side Topic to the National Election Results (2020 vs. 2024) as brought up by a commenter. Notice the difference in the vote for Others, voting numbers, etc. Similar occurred in 2016. Draw your own conclusions. I know what mine are. Charts and Data Taken from: Dave Leip’s Atlas
Space
Space
Space
Space
2024 Election
Space
Space
Look at the differences between 2016 and 2024 elections to the 2020 election when Biden ran. In 2016 there were 157 million eligible voters, Look at the chart to see the numbers that voted. Number of registered voters in the United States from 1996 to 2022
OK, I get it. Please do not blame the Democratic Party for losing just because their policy choices have favored the wealthy whilst tossing out some crumbs to the poor and minorities all on the backs of the middle-income (middle class has always meant something else until the US stumbled into its infinite stupidity about class and social structure behind the fig leaf of quasi-enlightened elitism) working class. Well, it don’t really bother me since I am actually middle class (around the 90th percentile by income) other than the stupid which I avoid as much as possible by living out in the undeveloped exurbs with only distant neighbors of working class multiracial little pocket communities. OTOH, if you think I am just being stupid, then check out “Liberalism and Its Discontents” by Francis Fukuyama.
BTW, I figured out all this fifty years before Fukuyama did long before it had become so obvious back when different choices might have lead to a different outcome.
“Cop Out for making a bad decision and putting Trump in office.” You chose . . .