Yglesias on Biden
Matt Yglesias has a critical piece up on Biden. I am largely in agreement with Yglesias’ take, although I tend to see his failings as due to longstanding character traits, while Yglesias puts more emphasis on Biden’s age. A couple of snippets (the whole thing is worth reading, but not sure if it is public):
Of course, many good people served in the Biden administration. And the administration did a number of admirable things. But on a fundamental level, Biden defined his entire post-2016 political comeback in terms of averting the Trumpian threat to American political institutions. And he failed, catastrophically! It’s not just that Trump won, it’s that he has returned more powerful than before. It’s that we are genuinely much worse off than we would have been if Trump were narrowly reelected in 2020. It’s that Biden alienated an entire cohort of young people, along with many of the leaders of the most important companies in America.
[. . .]
The obvious reality is that Biden and a relatively close circle of aids mislead many of their own appointees and fellow Democratic Party elected officials. They lied to the public, not convincingly enough to persuade most Americans, but convincingly enough to persuade most Democrats, and in the process, made their friends and supporters look ridiculous. They selected a VP nominee they didn’t have confidence in as a party leader and whom they did not set up to succeed. And they put the whole Democratic Party in a series of impossible situations because of their hubris, or vainglory, or I don’t know what. And I’m concerned that we’re now in a situation where the only people who want to say that publicly are either Republicans or, to a lesser extent, leftists.
There’s an urgent need for common sense Democrats to buck the establishment and admit what everyone knows: Biden fucked up, badly, in his handling of his age, and the effort to keep this under wraps seems to be related to some of the ideological failings of his presidency.
[. . .]
When you look at specific critiques about how Biden couldn’t make choices and set priorities, or too reluctant to say “no” to liberal interest groups, or not enough of a fighter or had bad vibes, they all trace back to a president who couldn’t put in a full-time schedule or be forceful.
As long as Biden was in office, it made sense for Republicans to focus on his infirmities and for Democrats to be defensive. But at the end of the day, it was good for Republicans that Biden was so old and doubly good for Republicans that Biden chose a relatively weak politician as his VP. The people who got screwed by this decision-making were you and me, and thousands of down ballot elected officials who were harmed by his unpopularity, and tens of millions of people whose SNAP and Medicaid are now imperiled by the GOP trifecta.
I’m angry about this!

Probably should be angry at the voters too; the ones that thought Biden controlled the price of eggs.
Reminds me of what Obama is reported to have said,“Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to fuck things up.”
But then Obama fixed things in South Carolina so that Biden would be the nominee! Go figure.
@John,
While I voted for Obama both times and believe he was a good president, he was not a party man.
As for this: “Biden chose a relatively weak politician as his VP.” Harris wiped the floor with Trump in the debate. Her major weakness was being female.
Joel:
Yes, on this Joel.
Why did you leave out the other aspect, a physical one? Harris was and still is a “Black American.” Obviously, having a overweight, orange-faced, low level, white male in office was a better choice.
I see a choice being made her by much of America. Can we put up with an male whose past performance in business was questionable and who obvious tendencies (if we are to call it such) are skewed towards the wealthy billionaires or do we select a Black female to replace Biden?
Who elected Trump? Mostly white voters and those who chose not to vote and stayed home. Why would they stay home? Didn’t like Harris or Trump.
A little issue with inflation also. Fantastic job done by Biden to provide healthcare relief and funds to people out of work. Not so great a job done by business interests who took the opportunity to adjust prices when there was little reason to do so. Rerun of 2008 when similar supply issues were prevalent.
One chip manufacturer to me, “we are raising our prices 20%, take it or leave it.” We ate it for the time being and chose another source for other automotive projects. Can’t say no to the domestic three about their chosen supplier.
We had one of the better economies ever during a pandemic. And Democrats failed to explain why inflation occurred (even if the unknowledgeable did not understand the explanation). It was definitely a choice. The right one was made and business entities took advantage because they could.
My working hypothesis is pretty simple. Biden was significantly diminished on entering office that it’s pointless to hold him personally responsible for decisions related to this past election and pretty much anything at all during his term in office. Yglesias seems to recognize this at some level, but then also expresses personal anger with Biden. If Yglesias is using “Biden” as a kind of label here for the results of this activity, he should say that, but if he really means he is angry with the person Biden, that’s pointless in my view. Hindsight is golden of course, but I think I recommended forcing Biden all the way off the stage and running President Harris and not Vice-President Harris. Maybe other party figures wished to keep Biden in office to prevent Harris from being the inevitable candidate, but then they seemed to all get in line behind her in about 3 days anyway.
The entire point of Yglesias’ criticism is political–Biden was not up to the job of being political as president as Obama for example was. It seems to miss the point that Biden was the best president in my lifetime in terms of governing and doing things for the average American. LBJ would have that crown but for the Vietnam war. He also was the most decent human being to be president since at least Jimmy Carter and I think that rather than his age was his biggest undoing. As for not stepping aside sooner while I am sure that Newsome, Shapiro maybe Beshear, maybe Whitmer would have preferred that, I suspect the result would have been a much less unified Democrat party in November 2024 and each of those candidates had bigger political problems than Harris. The real bottom line was that in November 2024, white voters showed up and voters of color–black, Hispanic and Asians did not. Whether that was due to Republican suppression or apathy on behalf of those voters I do not know, but they are getting the brunt of FAFO and they could have had a very talented president who would look out for their interests instead of scapegoating them.
Terrance:
Even though older, Biden gave us a good economy and rescued many others, which other presidents would have left floundering on state resources alone. I include Obama in that statement also . . . Social Security.
Voter apathy was a big issue. Many did not vote for either candidate. They voted for other candidates or the family dog, Mickey, Donald, etc. There were more Pres candidates than in the last two elections. The constituency still did not like a woman president and showed they especially did not like a Black woman for president. The latter was true, even after candidate Kamala Harris wiped the floor with Trump.
The top 5 2024 candidates after Harris, took in 2.5 million votes. Then there were others. Another 10 candidates took in 144,000. Less than 1000 received 215,000 votes.
The top 4 2020 candidates (far less showing at least 1 tenth of 1 percent) were at 2.4 million votes.
158,401,939 voters in 2020 and 155,220,574 voters in 2024.
136,452,150 voters in 2016. Clinton had the popular vote and still lost 65,844,969 to 62,979,984.
7.6 million votes went to others in 2016.
Perhaps, we have an issue with women candidates and another issue with minority candidates.
Source is Ballotpedia
I don’t see what was so bad about President Biden! In my view, he did a “good job”! The Republicans are still trying make “Reaganomics” work, and Trump is trying to make tariffs work! My professor who taught Economics 101 enlightened us about what failure tariffs are (evidently Trump didn’t pay attention or probably didn’t attend Economics 101 at Penn). Trump has been using bullying tactics against our allies to make the appearance that he is making America Great Again. He is letting his pal Putin continue to try to destroy Ukraine!
I felt comfortable with Biden as president, but Trump makes me worry! He conned the United States during his first try at being president, and now he is really trying to extract as much wealth from the middle class as he can! His appointees seem to be lacking the necessary job skills to do the job, and they also seem to be easy to control!
The Trump presidency will be the USA’s “Great Leap backward”! God help us all!
Joseph:
I agree with you. What is occurring is not for the benefit of the many. Hopefully and between the courts and Congress, there is a huge adjust to the policies and actions being promoted by this president.