Immigration to the United States and Its Impact to the Federal Budget
There has been much noise about immigration to the United States. Enough so as to have an impact on the last US election with people selecting an isolationist to be the president. At this time, the new president is discussing removing them from the United States. There are laws in place allowing immigrants to stay in the country while they are vetted. Many of them have jobs at a lower base than citizens but sustains them in the United States. It is not possible for them to obtain public funds although they may get healthcare, etc.
The issue of this commentary is to detail what the plan was as determined by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and their economic impact. There is revenue being generated by their presence. This is a brief outline. In another commentary, we I will chart out the demographics from another site which will support why we should have more immigrants.
Effects of the Immigration Surge on the Federal Budget and the Economy, Congressional Budget Office
Introduction
The number of people entering the United States has increased in recent years. The increase comes from a surge in people the Congressional Budget Office categorizes as other foreign nationals. Some of them have received permission to enter or remain in the country, and some have not. More detail on the composition of immigrants in that category is provided below. On the basis of pre-2020 trends, CBO would have expected the net immigration of people in that category to average around 200,000 per year.1 In the agency’s projections, the net immigration of other foreign nationals exceeds that rate by a total of 8.7 million people over the 2021–2026 period.
The CBO describes how that 2021–2026 surge in immigration affects its baseline budget and economic projections for the 2024–2034 period. This report looks at the incremental impact of the immigration surge and not at the effects of all people who immigrated in those years or who previously immigrated and were already residing in the United States. In addition, only the surge’s effects on federal revenues, mandatory spending, and interest on the debt are examined in detail. The report provides a broad assessment of possible effects on federal discretionary funding. It does not include estimates of the surge’s effects on state and local budgets. The state impact is separate.
The effects of the increase in immigration in its baseline budget projections and the economic forecast that underlies them are isolated. The CBO constructs a counterfactual scenario in which the increase does not occur. Instead and from 2021 to 2034, the net immigration of people in the other-foreign-national category totals 200,000 people per year (which, from 2027 on, is the same as in the baseline projections). The agency creates economic and budget projections for the counterfactual scenario and compares those outcomes with its economic forecast and baseline budget projections. The differences between outcomes under the two scenarios represent CBO’s estimates of the effects of the surge in immigration.
CBO’s estimates of the effects of the immigration surge on the federal budget and the economy are very uncertain. The agency will continue to evaluate new data and other information as it becomes available to bolster or change its findings.
Budgetary Effects
The increase in immigration boosts federal revenues as well as mandatory spending and interest on the debt in CBO’s baseline projections, lowering deficits, on net, by $0.9 trillion over the 2024–2034 period (see Table 1).2 Some of the effects on the budget result from the increase in the number of people paying taxes and collecting federal benefits. Other budgetary effects stem from changes in the economy over that period that are brought on by the surge, including increases in interest rates and in the productivity of workers who are not part of the surge.
Revenue
CBO estimates the immigration surge will add $1.2 trillion in federal revenues over the 2024–2034 period. The annual increase in revenues grows over time and reaches $167 billion (or 2.2 percent of total revenues) in 2034 in the agency’s projections. Individual income taxes and payroll taxes paid by immigrants who are part of the surge are responsible for most of the effects on revenues. In addition, the surge is projected to boost economic activity and, in turn, tax revenues.
OutLays
The immigration surge adds $0.3 trillion to outlays for federal mandatory programs and net spending for interest on the debt over the 2024–2034 period in CBO’s projections. Annual outlays for certain mandatory programs increase over time as more immigrants in the surge population and their children who are born in the United States receive benefits. In 2034, those benefits add $23 billion (or 0.4 percent) to total mandatory spending. In addition, the economywide effects of the surge boost annual spending by growing amounts that reach $27 billion in 2034. Most notably, spending for interest on the government’s debt increases, primarily because of the higher interest rates resulting from the surge in immigration. In total, projected outlays in 2034 are boosted by $50 billion because of the surge.
Discretionary Spending
The estimates do not include any effects on discretionary spending (which is controlled by appropriation acts). The CBO expects the immigration surge will put pressure on the budgets of many programs and activities funded through discretionary appropriations, including some administered or undertaken by the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of Refugee Resettlement (in the Department of Health and Human Services). Funding for certain discretionary activities related specifically to immigration totaled $37 billion in 2024. This is increase of $1 billion from the 2019 amount after the effects of inflation are removed—and the Administration has requested additional funding for 2024.
In addition, the surge is likely to affect other discretionary programs whose operations are affected by the size of the population, including those that provide funding for elementary and secondary education, income support, and infrastructure. If discretionary funding for the broad budget categories that are likely to be affected by a larger population was increased in proportion to the increase in the population from the surge, those funding increases would total $24 billion in 2034 and $0.2 trillion over the 2024–2034 period, CBO estimates.
CBO’s estimates do not include discretionary funding. Such funding will depend on future actions taken by lawmakers. Increasing funding for certain purposes could be accomplished by boosting total appropriations or by shifting resources from other areas.
The surge in immigration will also affect the budgets of states and localities; its impact will vary among jurisdictions. Research has generally found that increases in immigration raise state and local governments’ costs more than their revenues. The CBO expects that finding to hold in the case of the current immigration surge. The surge population shares some characteristics with the immigrant populations examined in the existing research studies but differs from them in other ways, and CBO has not fully analyzed the effects of the immigration surge on the budgets of state and local governments. (See Box 1 for further discussion.)
Economic Effects
Some of the projected budgetary effects of the immigration surge stem from broader changes in the economy the surge is expected to bring about. In CBO’s projections, the surge boosts total nominal gross domestic product (GDP) by $1.3 trillion (or 3.2 percent) in 2034 and by $8.9 trillion over the 2024–2034 period. The surge increases the total amount of wages paid each year by a percentage that grows steadily over that period and reaches about 3 percent in 2034. Those additional wages are a major contributor to the boost in revenues because they are subject to both payroll and income taxes. In addition, two main factors resulting from the surge—faster growth of the labor force and greater demand for residential investment—boost the rate of return on capital and put upward pressure on interest rates. The increases in interest rates are a major contributor to the boost in federal spending.
In the labor market, wages for workers in the surge population start out below the wages of other people in the United States with similar levels of education, on average, and converge over time in CBO’s estimates. Through 2026, the average wage growth of people in the United States who are not part of the surge is slightly less than it would have been without the surge because the surge slows the growth of wages of people with 12 or fewer years of education. That pattern reverses in later years as the average wage growth of people who are not part of the surge increases slightly because of higher innovation-related productivity and because the increase in the number of less-educated workers boosts the demand for more-educated people to work with them.
1. The net immigration of other foreign nationals is the number of people newly categorized as other foreign nationals in a given year (whether they entered the country during the year or already resided in the United States under a temporary status that expired) minus the people who are no longer in that category because they emigrated or because they obtained a legal immigration status and are thus accounted for in another category. Net immigration rates exclude deaths of people in the category.
2. Mandatory spending consists of outlays for most federal benefit programs—Social Security and Medicare, for example—and for certain other payments to people, businesses, nonprofit institutions, and state and local governments. Mandatory spending is generally governed by statutory criteria and is not normally constrained by the annual appropriation process.


Three things of most interest for me. First is the likely fiscal disconnects between federal impact and state and local. That’s a powerful complication. Social Security and Medicare finances get a lift from immigration, but it seems as if that lift is only sustainable if those immigrants not eligible for benefits stay in that status. That seems difficult to believe will happen, especially since that population skews pretty young. I sense that group has far more 22 year-olds thinking they will never go back than 58 year-olds wanting better wages for 6 or 7 years before returning. But I’m guessing at that. The convergence of wages after time is ambiguous. If you are in a nice warm bath and a 100 pound block of ice is added, yes the temperature will converge. But before then the bather will want that block removed.
Eric:
I have reason to believe either you or your predecessors have not been here for a long period of time. But then, my ancestors were not Indians.
The family name goes back a ways. I think my father’s family would have been happy if he had not married a pretty Italian woman who was the first generation in America. Indeed, it appears I am entitled to Italian citizenship as first generation. I can trace my lineage and the family still exists. In another sense, maybe I should be leaving the country because my mother was born of immigrants?
The doors for immigrants did not open because of government programs need for funding. Social Security can still be fixed if Congress acts to increase the tax maybe now 2 tenths of 1%. SS agreed with Angry Bear this would work.
Heathcare pricing outstrips its true costs because it is a commercial venture. That innovation would disappear if the treatment of people and the costs resulting would be controlled to the reality of it is not true. We could discuss the availability of doctors too. The reality there is the industry determines the pathway and the numbers in the industry. What doctors get paid by specialty is determined also. I am sure someone is jumping up and down due to my commentary.
If people are admitted to the US, they are bound to the rules and the laws governing that admission. There is no exceptions. If you do not pay taxes, eventually the gov knocks on your door and asks for its money. The same holds true for immigrants. The Gov knows who was admitted and those admitted can not disappear forever.
I have pointed out time and time again, the replacement ratio does not equal today’s population. There is a gap in the numbers of people who can replace us at our jobs. It sounds far-fetched; however, it is a reality. The nation needs labor and especially in areas where the numbers of elderly will grow exponentially.
You keep returning with the same dialogue. I and other keep explaining. The nation is huge. Opportunities keep coming and they need Labor. Growing a new batch of Labor takes to long so we allow immigration. I would practice up on understanding Spanish.
The CBO numbers are there and they reflect a positive growth in productivity in $Dollars from immigration.