Q4 2022 GDP positive, but both long leading components continue negative
Q4 2022 GDP positive, but both long leading components continue negative
– by New Deal democrat
Here’s my last note for this morning.
Real Q4 GDP came in at +0.7%, or +2.8% annualized. While this is lower than most quarters in the past several years, as shown below:

Although not shown (due to the huge pandemic swings), it would have been slightly above average for any quarter in the 10 years that predated the pandemic.
But as usual, my focus is on the two long leading components in the GDP report: proprietors’ income, a proxy for corporate profits, and private residential fixed investment (housing) as a share of GDP.
And the bottom line is, both were negative.
Proprietors’ income (blue in the graph below), a proxy for corporate profits (red), which won’t be reported for another two months, were up +3.2% nominally. The “official” leading metric uses unit labor costs as a deflator, which we also don’t know yet, so I’ve substituted the implicit GDP deflator as a temporary fix:

As deflated, they were down -0.4% for the quarter, and -4.0% since their Q2 2021 peak. Employers who are making less profit start to cut back labor’s hours and jobs, or at least on hiring. In other words, this portends future further weakening of the jobs market.
Secondly, real private residential investment as a share of GDP is a long leading indicator popularized over 15 years ago by Prof. Edward Leamer. It tends to turn down 6-7 quarters before a recession hits. It is even slightly more leading when calculated in real inflation-adjusted terms. Unsurprisingly, in Q4 of last year this took another bad hit:

This metric has been screaming “recession!” for several quarters now; just remember that supply constraints mean that housing units under construction made an all time high last month, as reported in last week’s monthly update for December.
This adds even more evidence for the proposition that there will be a recession this year.
All of these analyses are superb, and unfortunately just now convincing. A matter I do not understand just now, however, is why home prices are so high from the perspective of the Shiller real home price history from 1890 on. What could be going on structurally?
Anyway, the analyses are superb.
ltr:
In Arizona, it is demand. Many people are moving to the state. Many are coming from California and other high cost states. They can bid up prices and sellers can set terms which were unbelievable in other states. We would bid $10,000 higher than the asking price and were outbid by double or more.
In Michigan, we were situated in an area with lower property taxes and good services plus a good school district. We got our price plus some and 6 months of free rent. Just north of Ann Arbor, it was desirable. If we averaged it out over 20-something years, we appreciated 2.5% per year. During 2008, we were at break even.
Just some thoughts. I am sure NDd appreciates your comment. Thank you.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=YcwR
January 30, 2018
Case-Shiller Real Home Price Index, 1992-2018
(Indexed to 1992)