Why is current economic growth called strong?
As of the second quarter the year over year percent change in real GDP is 2.3%. Virtually everyone refers to this as strong. Why? By historic standards 2.3% real GDP growth is subpar. It is below the long term growth rate of the economy using virtually any widely accepted estimate of trend or potential growth. Many republicans actually claim that the potential growth rate is now 4%. If so, it would only make Trump’s 2%-3% growth look worse.
In 1967, real GDP growth was 2.7%, significantly stronger than the current rate. Yet, that was labeled as a GROWTH RECESSION. In Obama’s second term, after the recession and economic recovery, his economic expansion averaged 2.4% growth, or essentially the same growth Trump has experienced during what is actually the same economic expansion. But Obama’s record was almost universally labeled as weak growth and Trump’s as strong. Trump recently bragged that the economic expansion just passed ten years, to become the longest in US history. But seven and a half years of this was under Obama and only two and a half years have been under Trump. Virtually all the data says that current growth is just a continuation of the trends established under Obama. To date Trumps policies have had essentially no impact on economic growth. In this expansion the strongest q/q SAAR was 5.5% in IV 2014 and the strongest y/y growth was 4.0% in first quarter 2015–both under Obama.
I can understand Trump and the Republican propaganda machine calling 2.4% growth weak and 2.3% growth “THE STRONGEST ON RECORD” as Trump repeatedly does.
But why do we let the media and many economist get away with repeating this republican propaganda. Shouldn’t we be calling them out every time they do this, for practicing such sloppy economics.
Note, all growth rates are rounded to one decimal point. Economist quote two decimal points just to prove they have a sense of humor.
Even that “2.3” % is a total guess. Imo too high. They don’t have a clue
There may be some pro-conservative media bias at work, but I think another aspect is that people are expecting a downturn at this point in the business cycle so getting relatively normal growth feels like a pleasant surprise.
But why do we let the media and many economist get away with repeating this republican propaganda?? Simple. Media is owned by a few wealthy Republican-minded owners. Except for maybe the WaPo, but it’s still a very wealthy owner.
Welcome to Angry Bear, First time comments and commenters always go to moderation to weed out spam, spammers, and advertising.
Is the Federal Reserve ever going to let the stock market naturally correct or will it continue to inflate the largest credit bubble of all time? So many people think the Fed has all the answers, but the next downturn is looming and there is absolutely nothing the Fed can do about it. Watch out below!
Welcome to Angry Bear. First time comments by new commenters always go to moderation to weed out spam, spammers, and advertising
I say pile on as much debt as possible. Just never pay it. That is what everyone is going to anyway. These idiots in Washington still think you can spend your way out of a credit bubble. They are all wrong and will soon find out the hard way.