• About
  • Contact
  • Editorial
  • Policies
  • Archives
Angry Bear
Relevant and even prescient commentary on news, politics and the economy.
  • US/Global Economics
  • Taxes/regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Climate Change
  • Social Security
  • Hot Topics
« Back

Open thread Dec.19, 2018

Dan Crawford | December 19, 2018 8:18 am

Tags: open thread Comments (2) | Digg Facebook Twitter |
2 Comments
  • Denis Drew says:
    December 19, 2018 at 11:23 am

    The Gila Monster versus The Gilead Monster

    Halting or seriously slowing the inexorable progression of Parkinson’s disease may hopefully be in the offing. Two trials — phase one, open label (2013) and phase two, double blind (2017) — found no worsening of motor ability after one year for treated groups.

    The potentially Parkinson’s symptom stabilizing drug, Exenatide (Byetta, Bydureon), along with similar GLP-1 drugs, has been successfully used managing Type II diabetes. For diabetics Exenatide increases insulin and cuts glucose proportionately to how much they eat (the smart drug) and slows digestion — mimicking a hormone already existing in their bloodstreams (therefore tending to few side effects) but lasting hours or days instead of minutes. And as the TV commercials say: they might even lose a little weight.

    My personal experience with Byetta and Byduron was losing 50 pounds in 50 weeks without effort — needed to lose 100 — keeping my A1C (blood sugar) level at 5.7 (very good) and, after five years, going into remission. The latter is relatively unusual.

    Exenatide was developed in the Bronx VA, by endocrinologist Dr. John Eng. The story of how he extracted the now possibly twice-useful molecule from the saliva of a Gila monster (pronounced “Hila”) is here:
    http://www.mendosa.com/monster.htm

    Beautiful blow-up of a fat Gila monster pictured here:
    https://scienceofparkinsons.com/2018/06/13/exenatide/

    Two miracles for the price of one.
    * * * * * *

    From Gila Monster to Gilead monster: whence the through the financial roof pricing of a miracle drug has a less happy ending. Harvoni (Sovaldi + laedipasvir), is a 95-99% cure for Hepatitis C but is being kept out of circulation from all but the most ill sufferers by piratical pricing: $100,000 for a treatment that costs $200 to manufacture.
    https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/the-quest-84000-miracle-cure-costs-less-than-150-to-make/

    Sovaldi was discovered by VA endocrinologist, Dr. Raymond Schinazi, working in the labs of his company that he founded, Pharmasset. Dr. Schinazi had previously developed two front line HIV drugs, lamivudine and emtricitabine, in VA labs, one or the other of which is found in 90% of the combination anti-viral regimens taken by US HIV patients.

    Dr. Schinazi worked on salary leading the research on the two (unpronounceable) HVC prescriptions but profited $446 million (!) on Sovaldi, when his firm was bought for $11 billion by Gilead. He proclaims: “There is nothing better than saving lives.” He would exercise his genius for public or private coin. He says he has nothing to do with Gilead’s pricing.

    Some least developed countries (LDCs) exercise TRIPS treaty rights to suspend patents in the face of widespread epidemics, such as AIDS or just plain critical public health needs and impossibility of paying high patent premiums. This practice is called “compulsory licensing.”

    Though not many countries have exercised this option with not many drugs — South Africa, Brazil, Thailand (in 2007 for HIV, cancer, cardio), Ecuador, Indonesia — so far, the US has not condoned a single instance.
    https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/public_health_faq_e.htm
    http://infojustice.org/archives/39594
    https://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0131/p07s02-woap.html

    US drug monopolies add up to tariffs for other countries — and at 1,000 percent or 10,000 percent rates, not 25 percent. In India Gilead prices Harvoni at $999 a treatment — maybe because the company is afraid of what India might do if it tried to price sky high.
    * * * * * *

    If India and or China (not a compulsory licensing issuer) or any group of countries would like to break American drug monopolies they can simply offer the American public the medicine to wipe out Hep C in a single stroke for miserly $1 billion (earning themselves a nice hundreds of millions manufacturing profit, assuming similar costs) — but US drug patent laws would have to double-reverse their incentives to make it legal to accept the $299 billion (and years of needlessly enduring and spreading disease) saving.

    One (of many?) possible revamps: replace drug patent structure with government funded research on drugs and medical devices — all new drugs becoming generic. Erect a regulated monopoly system similar to electric power distribution for already patented drugs. Harvoni, for example, having long since paid off Gilead’s (not very chancy) $11 billion dollar gamble could be immediately designated generic.

    Secretive patent competition slows proliferation of scientific advances — leads to copy-cat research displacing real pioneering — or to no effort at all to repurpose existing treatments as patent incentives run down and out.

    The Phase Two Parkinson’s trial was paid for by the Michael J. Fox Foundation — AztraZeneca not being particularly interested as its patent was running down. An effort is now being mounted to support a phase three trial which could lead to connecting the enormously liberating research with all Parkinson’s sufferers.
    http://cepr.net/publications/briefings/testimony/drugs-are-cheap-why-do-we-let-governments-make-them-expensive

    Taxpayers — not Big Pharma — have funded the research behind every new drug since 2010 — Alexander Zaitchik
    https://other98.com/taxpayers-fund-pharma-research-development/

    Today the US government funds over $25 billion a year worth of drug research. Private pharmaceutical firms puts up $50 billion. Big pharma spends more on advertising than research — justifying even higher prices to supply “incentive?”
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/02/11/big-pharmaceutical-companies-are-spending-far-more-on-marketing-than-research/?utm_term=.c2e5f3e7b2ad

    How could American politicians explain not taking the offer to one-shot, wipe out for Hepatitis C, for a pittance (that it should cost here)? Would Americans willing face paying Gilead $15 billion a year waiting for Gilead’s 20 year patent to run out — while more sufferers come down with Hepatitis and 20,000 die every year — when there’s something they can do about it?
    https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2016/p0504-hepc-mortality.html

    Dr. Schinazi, whose family hails from Egypt says, “Today they have cured HVC from over 600,000 people using generic and proprietary drugs in Egypt; they are relatively cheap but in those days it was life and death. Everybody wanted that drug, the people lined up for miles trying to get it. Every family in Egypt was affected.”
    https://pharmaintelligence.informa.com/resources/product-content/where-there-is-a-a-cure-there-ia-controversy

    This could be a first-world story too.

  • Dave Barnes says:
    December 19, 2018 at 12:07 pm

    ∅

Featured Stories

Macron Bypasses Parliament With ‘Nuclear Option’ on Retirement Age Hike

Angry Bear

All Electric comes to Heavy Equipment

Daniel Becker

Medicare Plan Commissions May Steer Beneficiaries to Wrong Coverage

run75441

Thoughts on Silicon Valley Bank: Why the FDIC plan isn’t (but also is) a Bailout

NewDealdemocrat

Contributors

Dan Crawford
Robert Waldmann
Barkley Rosser
Eric Kramer
ProGrowth Liberal
Daniel Becker
Ken Houghton
Linda Beale
Mike Kimel
Steve Roth
Michael Smith
Bill Haskell
NewDealdemocrat
Ken Melvin
Sandwichman
Peter Dorman
Kenneth Thomas
Bruce Webb
Rebecca Wilder
Spencer England
Beverly Mann
Joel Eissenberg

Subscribe

Blogs of note

    • Naked Capitalism
    • Atrios (Eschaton)
    • Crooks and Liars
    • Wash. Monthly
    • CEPR
    • Econospeak
    • EPI
    • Hullabaloo
    • Talking Points
    • Calculated Risk
    • Infidel753
    • ACA Signups
    • The one-handed economist
Angry Bear
Copyright © 2023 Angry Bear Blog

Topics

  • US/Global Economics
  • Taxes/regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Climate Change
  • Social Security
  • Hot Topics
  • US/Global Economics
  • Taxes/regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Climate Change
  • Social Security
  • Hot Topics

Pages

  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial
  • Policies
  • Archives