Eviction Data Base shows we have a housing crisis
I am posting this NPR Fresh Air radio article here because it talks about a part of our society that has not been talked about much. When it comes to discussion of taxation, social programs, how our economy works, the basic premise of free market misses an awful lot.
From the page:
For many poor families in America, eviction is a real and ongoing threat. Sociologist Matthew Desmond estimates that 2.3 million evictions were filed in the U.S. in 2016 — a rate of four every minute.
“Eviction isn’t just a condition of poverty; it’s a cause of poverty,” Desmond says. “Eviction is a direct cause of homelessness, but it also is a cause of residential instability, school instability [and] community instability.”
Desmond won a Pulitzer Prize in 2017 for his book, Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City. His latest project is The Eviction Lab, a team of researchers and students at Princeton University dedicated to amassing the nation’s first-ever database of eviction. To date, the Lab had collected 83 million records from 48 states and the District of Columbia.
“We’re in the middle of a housing crisis, and that means more and more people are giving more and more of their income to rent and utilities,” Desmond says. “Our hope is that we can take this problem that’s been in the dark and bring it into the light.”
One stat that stood out: The average age of the homeless is 9 years old. That is how many homeless are children.
Incomes have remained flat for many Americans over the last two decades, but housing costs have soared. So between 1995 and today, median asking rents have increased by 70 percent…So when we picture the typical low income American today, we shouldn’t think of them living in public housing or getting any kind [of] housing assistance for the government, we should think of folks who are paying 60, 70, 80 percent of their income and living unassisted in the private rental market. That’s our typical case today.
What is understood after listening is again, as a nation we are penny wise and pound foolish. Somehow, some way we have to get this nation to understand it is less expensive to take care of people than it is to let them live in disparate poverty.
Stabilizing a home has all sorts of positive benefits for a family. The kid gets to finish school. The neighborhood doesn’t lose a crucial neighbor. The family gets to root down and get to understand the value of a home and avoid homelessness. And for all of us, I think [we] have to recognize that we’re paying the cost of eviction because whatever our issue is, whatever keeps us up at night, the lack of affordable housing sits at the root of that issue. …
Heard the same show and once again concluded that the only way to get Americans to consider help for the poverty stricken is to argue the costs in money rather than the moral imperatives of compassion.
yes, but after we take care of them (welfare?) we need to find decent work for them at a decent wage.
i don’t think our economy is going to find its way back to that model. too many people making too much money because they are the smartest and best, they think, so they not only won’t pay taxes for welfare, they won’t stand for any change in what looks to me like interlocking predatory business models.