• About
  • Contact
  • Editorial
  • Policies
  • Archives
Angry Bear
Relevant and even prescient commentary on news, politics and the economy.
  • US/Global Economics
  • Taxes/regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Climate Change
  • Social Security
  • Hot Topics
« Back

Velocity of M2 declining more quickly

Edward Lambert | August 10, 2016 10:40 am

US/Global Economics

In case you missed it, like I did, the velocity of the M2 money supply is declining more quickly. That normally indicates that the economy has taken the turn toward an eventual contraction.

m2s

Comments (5) | Digg Facebook Twitter |
5 Comments
  • The Rage says:
    August 10, 2016 at 12:56 pm

    lol, except capital growth accelerated in the 2nd quarter. Instead of contraction, it looks like M2 is essentially another dead indicator that is either being mis-valued or mis-counted.

  • John San Vant says:
    August 10, 2016 at 2:08 pm

    Sorry Ed, but your struggling here. M2 is down because the Boomers are causing brownouts. I would also argue, that China/SA have stabilized which suggests M2 will push up in the 2nd half of the year into next year. The US economy started a wage boom last year when oil prices stopped being so inhibiting toward real wages. I could see yry wage growth of about 2% in 2017, up from 1.5% now. That doesn’t spell contraction, that spells a boom in spending.

    • Edward Lambert says:
      August 10, 2016 at 3:54 pm

      Some people watch the velocity of M2. I do not watch it closely. It is a minor indicator. But it still says something.
      Alongside the wage boom, keep your eye on capacity utilization.

  • joe bongiovanni says:
    August 12, 2016 at 10:11 am

    Velocity – it needs more understanding for sure, and so more study.
    Time will provide the outcome here, but we should strive to establish some ‘causality’ to ‘velocity’s decline, that its data might be more helpful in the future.

    Velocity measures the ‘turnover’ rate of that M2 money supply, which money metric is steadily increasing
    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M2

    I would say that this Fed M2V chart is more indicative of the telltale trend .
    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M2V

    It points to a 30 percent reduction in M2 turnover in the last ten years,
    The velocity reduction means that money supply is not turning over, thus NOT making GDP.

    This might reflect a reduction of about $3.6 Trillion in the use (GDP) of the $12 + Trillion M2 aggregate.

    Where is it going, and why is it not turning over?
    Business confidence?

    In Fisher’s Debt-deflation theory, he clearly notes this velocity-reduction step as evidence of an output contraction (deflation) in progress.

    (2) Contraction of deposit currency, as bank loans are paid off, and to a slowing down of velocity of circulation.

    While QE and ZIRP have managed to keep the M2 money supply (Q – quantity) growing, me thinks the contraction of monetary velocity (V) is indeed measuring the deepening stagnation of economic throughput, China and capital formation notwithstanding.

  • Bert Schlitz says:
    August 22, 2016 at 7:04 pm

    Joe, I think QE and ZIRP are irrelevant. Once again, you are in the ‘I am not getting it gang”. M2 is irrelevant. Economic Stagnation? Since 1929?

    We are a consumption based economy. Velocity of money is irrelevant. It is actually money that is being consumed that counts.

Featured Stories

Index of leading indicators says recession almost certain; so what of the coincident indicators?

NewDealdemocrat

Extending Capital to Nature, Reducing Nature to Capital

Peter Dorman

Trump and the debt ceiling

Eric Kramer

And the King of Coincident Indicators rolls over

NewDealdemocrat

Contributors

Dan Crawford
Robert Waldmann
Barkley Rosser
Eric Kramer
ProGrowth Liberal
Daniel Becker
Ken Houghton
Linda Beale
Mike Kimel
Steve Roth
Michael Smith
Bill Haskell
NewDealdemocrat
Ken Melvin
Sandwichman
Peter Dorman
Kenneth Thomas
Bruce Webb
Rebecca Wilder
Spencer England
Beverly Mann
Joel Eissenberg

Subscribe

Blogs of note

    • Naked Capitalism
    • Atrios (Eschaton)
    • Crooks and Liars
    • Wash. Monthly
    • CEPR
    • Econospeak
    • EPI
    • Hullabaloo
    • Talking Points
    • Calculated Risk
    • Infidel753
    • ACA Signups
    • The one-handed economist
Angry Bear
Copyright © 2023 Angry Bear Blog

Topics

  • US/Global Economics
  • Taxes/regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Climate Change
  • Social Security
  • Hot Topics
  • US/Global Economics
  • Taxes/regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Climate Change
  • Social Security
  • Hot Topics

Pages

  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial
  • Policies
  • Archives