• About
  • Contact
  • Editorial
  • Policies
  • Archives
Angry Bear
Relevant and even prescient commentary on news, politics and the economy.
  • US/Global Economics
  • Taxes/regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Climate Change
  • Social Security
  • Hot Topics
« Back

Greed is good meme

Dan Crawford | August 24, 2013 9:36 am

Hot Topics
Politics

Lynne Parramor via Alternet writes a passionate post on Pete Peterson, Alan Greyson Simpson, and Erskine Bowles regarding Social Security. Along the same vein comes this quote from John Kenneth Galbraith via The Christian Left:

burke

Comments (3) | Digg Facebook Twitter |
3 Comments
  • Jack says:
    August 24, 2013 at 10:20 am

    “…passionate post on Pete Peterson, Alan Greyson, and Erskine Bowles regarding…”

    I think you mean to say Alan Simpson, or more aptly put Simpleton.

  • Kaleberg says:
    August 24, 2013 at 5:32 pm

    Is this related to the previous post? We live in a cruel world.

  • coberly says:
    August 24, 2013 at 9:15 pm

    Lynn,

    I agree with you wholeheartedly.

    but you make two mistakes. one serious.

    the not serious one is your statement that “the Trust Fund” will still be able to pay 75% of SS benefits. It’s not the Trust Fund that will pay the benefits. It’s the payroll “tax” (it’s really an insurance premium).

    The more serious mistake is calling for an increase in the cap so “the rich” can pay their “fair share” for SS.

    Roosevelt created SS “worker pays” because he was smart enough to see that would protect SS from the rich. He was right. Only today even the left has forgotten that.
    The tragedy here is that by calling for the rich to pay for SS, not only do you shoot yourself in the foot politically, but you are endangering SS in order to “save” the workers what amounts to an extra eighty cents per week.

    By raising the payroll tax one tenth of one percent per year…. for essentially 20 out of the next 70 years… while wages are projected to rise by more than one full percent for all of those years… SS would be made fully “solvent” and fully “funded” forever….. as far as we can see.

    It is politically shortsighted and bad policy to call for making the rich pay for Social Security. If I were starving I would be glad to get a handout, foodstamps, or welfare. But if I can pay for my own groceries, I do not want to be forced to take welfare. This is what forcing the rich to pay for my… and your… retirement amounts to.

    Social Security prevents poverty in old age by making it possible for workers to save their own money safe from inflation and safe from bad days on the market, and it allows the workers to insure each other against a lifetime of wages too low for them to save enough to be able to retire.

    It is insurance. It does no one any good except Mr Peterson to talk about it as if it were, or ought to be, welfare.

Featured Stories

Index of leading indicators says recession almost certain; so what of the coincident indicators?

NewDealdemocrat

Extending Capital to Nature, Reducing Nature to Capital

Peter Dorman

Trump and the debt ceiling

Eric Kramer

And the King of Coincident Indicators rolls over

NewDealdemocrat

Contributors

Dan Crawford
Robert Waldmann
Barkley Rosser
Eric Kramer
ProGrowth Liberal
Daniel Becker
Ken Houghton
Linda Beale
Mike Kimel
Steve Roth
Michael Smith
Bill Haskell
NewDealdemocrat
Ken Melvin
Sandwichman
Peter Dorman
Kenneth Thomas
Bruce Webb
Rebecca Wilder
Spencer England
Beverly Mann
Joel Eissenberg

Subscribe

Blogs of note

    • Naked Capitalism
    • Atrios (Eschaton)
    • Crooks and Liars
    • Wash. Monthly
    • CEPR
    • Econospeak
    • EPI
    • Hullabaloo
    • Talking Points
    • Calculated Risk
    • Infidel753
    • ACA Signups
    • The one-handed economist
Angry Bear
Copyright © 2023 Angry Bear Blog

Topics

  • US/Global Economics
  • Taxes/regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Climate Change
  • Social Security
  • Hot Topics
  • US/Global Economics
  • Taxes/regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Climate Change
  • Social Security
  • Hot Topics

Pages

  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial
  • Policies
  • Archives