As the CUTGO Congress attempts to return to the spending ways of 2001-2008, the parallels grow clearer. A simple table to allow easy comparison of the major initiatives of 2001 and 2011 is presented below.
Watching Cspan Washington Journal this morning and the Repub on said that in the new rules is not just the Cutgo, but also that any spending has to have with it a line/statement as to where in the constitution it’s allowed.
You’re making the assumption that the new healthcare law will still be force ten years from now. I wouldn’t count on it surviving in its current form.
Meanwhile, Blue Shield of California is seeking a huge premium rate increase. This is on the heels of the Wellpoint’s requested large increase of last year which was finally approved at much lower average rates.
The Obama Administration has already provided waivers to 222 employers, insurance companies, and unions.
I see no reason to expect that the new healthcare law will actually involve reduced Federal costs in the second ten years if the law survives. Once the next immigration law is passed, Medicaid enrollments should jump. The increased Medicaid enrollment costs are supposedly being covered by the Federal Government per the healthcare law, so it’s likely that the Federal Government will pick up the growth tab once the new immigration law kicks in.
You’re making the assumption that the new healthcare law will still be in force ten years from now. I wouldn’t count on it surviving in its current form.
Meanwhile, Blue Shield of California is seeking a huge premium rate increase. This is on the heels of the Wellpoint’s requested large increase of last year which was finally approved at much lower average rates. The Obama Administration has already provided new healthcare law waivers to 222 employers, insurance companies, and unions.
Federal costs for Medicaid should jump even higher once the next immigration law is passed. The increased Medicaid enrollment costs are supposedly being covered by the Federal Government per the healthcare law, so it’s likely that the Federal Government will pick up the growth tab once the new immigration law kicks in. Have you estimated the cost of such Federal action?
I see no reason to expect that the new healthcare law will actually involve reduced Federal costs in the second ten years if the law survives.
You’re making the assumption that the new healthcare law will still be in force ten years from now. I wouldn’t count on it surviving in its current form. Meanwhile, Blue Shield of California is seeking a huge premium rate increase. This is on the heels of the Wellpoint’s requested large increase of last year which was finally approved at much lower average rates. The Obama Administration has already provided new healthcare law waivers to 222 employers, insurance companies, and unions.
Federal costs for Medicaid should jump even higher once the next immigration law is passed. The increased Medicaid enrollment costs are supposedly being covered by the Federal Government per the healthcare law, so it’s likely that the Federal Government will pick up the growth tab once the new immigration law kicks in. Have you estimated the cost of such Federal action? I see no reason to expect that the new healthcare law will actually involve reduced Federal costs in the second ten years if the law survives.
Where are you getting this stuff? Yes, the Obama administration did grant 1 year waviers allowing companies time to adjust their policies . . . mostly mini-plans.
“as of Dec. 3, the federal government had approved a total of 222 one-year waviers that allow the insurance plans at companies like McDonald’s, Jack in the Box and Ruby Tuesday, and unions, to ignore the requirement on annual limits. Far from being “Obama’s buddies,” as the Internet post claimed, the restaurant industry, through the National Restaurant Association, opposed the legislation.” Your implication, which is disingenuous, implies they have completely opted out. Companies can apply for another 2-3 1 year exemptions up to 2014. http://factcheck.org/2010/12/health-care-law-waivers/ Health Care Law Waviers. I see no reason that doing nothing instead of reform will result in lower costs today or in the future. If we had implemented Hillary Care, it would have come at cost <25% of today's bill. Waiting sure helped us out. As far as Medicad, Medicare, and SS costs; if you want to minimize them, CREATE JOBS which has been nonexistant since 2001.
Still peddling baloney I see and citing Fox News as a backup. How apropo! The waviers are good for how long? One year. And you have made it seem the companies are exempt forever. By 2-014, the exempts will disappear and all will have to change.
Sure MG, I am making stuff up by posting Fact.Org which lists many more sites than you do. You had better check what you are writing about before you are posting it. And yes you are disingenuous. You do not know what you are talking about as usual and are just slinging mud.
Alot of people think we are doomed, but there are still great ways to make money. Even while the economy is collapsing around us.
I subscribe to the guy from australia and his FFT economic newsletter at http://www.forecastfortomorrow.com that guy has called many big events before they have happend, including the stock market crash in 2008 and the current financial collapse of the US. (currently happening) I found him from a friend last year, and he has some important work.
His oil calls are insane, and I have been making good money with them. He is well worth a look, if you want to keep two steps ahead of the sheeple out there.
I am worried about my financial future. Is anyone else nervous out there?
“I am worried about my financial future. Is anyone else nervous out there? Today, 11:28:03 PM” – Flag – Like – Reply uH yea. Kelly, I have been worried for a very long time.Bin Laden is not our worst enemy. The inteligencia in oure midst is. Harvard, Yale, Sucky, MIT, Suck my .. Obama, are about to suggest that they really don’t have to pay us back for blowing the retirement money they spent. (SS). We need to be very worried.
“I am worried about my financial future. Is anyone else nervous out there? Today, 11:28:03 PM” – Flag – Like – Reply uH yea. Kelly, I have been worried for a very long time.Bin Laden is not our worst enemy. The inteligencia in oure midst is. Harvard, Yale, Sucky, MIT, Suck my .. Obama, are about to suggest that they really don’t have to pay us back for blowing the retirement money they spent. (SS). We need to be very worried.
“I am worried about my financial future. Is anyone else nervous out there? Today, 11:28:03 PM” – Flag – Like – Reply uH yea. Kelly, I have been worried for a very long time.Bin Laden is not our worst enemy. The inteligencia in oure midst is. Harvard, Yale, Sucky, MIT, Suck my .. Obama, are about to suggest that they really don’t have to pay us back for blowing the retirement money they spent. (SS). We need to be very worried.
As my Dad dies. A Silver recipient and two Bronze medals for valor (never said a word) and a Purple Heart (shot in the face in Schitten Germany 1945), Steward for the Teamsters Local ( I’m not sure). I am sure that Butte , Monatana is the Home of Miners Union Local # 1. That is where I grew up. Country.
As my Dad dies. A Silver recipient and two Bronze medals for valor (never said a word) and a Purple Heart (shot in the face in Schitten Germany 1945), Steward for the Teamsters Local ( I’m not sure). I am sure that Butte , Monatana is the Home of Miners Union Local # 1. That is where I grew up. Country.
“The Obama Administration has already provided new healthcare law waivers to 222 employers, insurance companies, and unions.”
is cherry-picked and meant to create the illusion that these waviers are permanent which they clearly are not. The waviers are meant to allow companies an opportunity to adjust there insurance plans. If they do not do so by 2014 after getting multiple extensions till then, they will pay penalties for not doing.
I called you on this point in post and it applies to your earlier post implying the same as well. Keep up with the name calling which is typical for a frayster who is caught on the facts. Smiling here . . . .
“The Obama Administration has already provided new healthcare law waivers to 222 employers, insurance companies, and unions.”
is cherry-picked and meant to create the illusion that these waviers are permanent which they clearly are not. The waviers are meant to allow companies an opportunity to adjust their insurance plans. If they do not do so by 2014 after getting multiple extensions till then, they will pay penalties for not changing their insurance policies.
I called you on this point in this post and it applies to your earlier post implying the same as well. That I didn’t call you out on the other post is of no consequence as I was busy working in one of those capacity constrained industries. Keep up with the name calling as it enhances your reputation further and is typical for a frayster who is caught on the facts. Smiling here . . . . 🙂
You’re dishonesty is something else. I wouldn’t have expected that from you, but will be aware of it in the future.
I posted that information previously because Webb said that the only waiver pending before the HHR was one for the State of Maine. That wasn’t the case.
You’re dishonesty is something else. I wouldn’t have expected that from you, but will be aware of it in the future.
I posted that information previously because Webb said that the only waiver pending before the HHR was one for the State of Maine. That wasn’t the case.
Try keeping up.
It’s the official record from the Department of Health & Human Services. Nothing more and nothing less.
Your phony claims on this thread are absurd. You’re telling outright lies.
Watching Cspan Washington Journal this morning and the Repub on said that in the new rules is not just the Cutgo, but also that any spending has to have with it a line/statement as to where in the constitution it’s allowed.
They are just so funny these repubs.
You’re making the assumption that the new healthcare law will still be force ten years from now. I wouldn’t count on it surviving in its current form.
Meanwhile, Blue Shield of California is seeking a huge premium rate increase. This is on the heels of the Wellpoint’s requested large increase of last year which was finally approved at much lower average rates.
The Obama Administration has already provided waivers to 222 employers, insurance companies, and unions.
I see no reason to expect that the new healthcare law will actually involve reduced Federal costs in the second ten years if the law survives. Once the next immigration law is passed, Medicaid enrollments should jump. The increased Medicaid enrollment costs are supposedly being covered by the Federal Government per the healthcare law, so it’s likely that the Federal Government will pick up the growth tab once the new immigration law kicks in.
You’re making the assumption that the new healthcare law will still be in force ten years from now. I wouldn’t count on it surviving in its current form.
Meanwhile, Blue Shield of California is seeking a huge premium rate increase. This is on the heels of the Wellpoint’s requested large increase of last year which was finally approved at much lower average rates.
The Obama Administration has already provided new healthcare law waivers to 222 employers, insurance companies, and unions.
Federal costs for Medicaid should jump even higher once the next immigration law is passed. The increased Medicaid enrollment costs are supposedly being covered by the Federal Government per the healthcare law, so it’s likely that the Federal Government will pick up the growth tab once the new immigration law kicks in. Have you estimated the cost of such Federal action?
I see no reason to expect that the new healthcare law will actually involve reduced Federal costs in the second ten years if the law survives.
You’re making the assumption that the new healthcare law will still be in force ten years from now. I wouldn’t count on it surviving in its current form.
Meanwhile, Blue Shield of California is seeking a huge premium rate increase. This is on the heels of the Wellpoint’s requested large increase of last year which was finally approved at much lower average rates.
The Obama Administration has already provided new healthcare law waivers to 222 employers, insurance companies, and unions.
Federal costs for Medicaid should jump even higher once the next immigration law is passed. The increased Medicaid enrollment costs are supposedly being covered by the Federal Government per the healthcare law, so it’s likely that the Federal Government will pick up the growth tab once the new immigration law kicks in. Have you estimated the cost of such Federal action?
I see no reason to expect that the new healthcare law will actually involve reduced Federal costs in the second ten years if the law survives.
MG:
Where are you getting this stuff? Yes, the Obama administration did grant 1 year waviers allowing companies time to adjust their policies . . . mostly mini-plans.
“as of Dec. 3, the federal government had approved a total of 222 one-year waviers that allow the insurance plans at companies like McDonald’s, Jack in the Box and Ruby Tuesday, and unions, to ignore the requirement on annual limits. Far from being “Obama’s buddies,” as the Internet post claimed, the restaurant industry, through the National Restaurant Association, opposed the legislation.”
Your implication, which is disingenuous, implies they have completely opted out. Companies can apply for another 2-3 1 year exemptions up to 2014. http://factcheck.org/2010/12/health-care-law-waivers/ Health Care Law Waviers.
I see no reason that doing nothing instead of reform will result in lower costs today or in the future. If we had implemented Hillary Care, it would have come at cost <25% of today's bill. Waiting sure helped us out. As far as Medicad, Medicare, and SS costs; if you want to minimize them, CREATE JOBS which has been nonexistant since 2001.
MG:
Still peddling baloney I see and citing Fox News as a backup. How apropo! The waviers are good for how long? One year. And you have made it seem the companies are exempt forever. By 2-014, the exempts will disappear and all will have to change.
Sure MG, I am making stuff up by posting Fact.Org which lists many more sites than you do. You had better check what you are writing about before you are posting it. And yes you are disingenuous. You do not know what you are talking about as usual and are just slinging mud.
Keep trying!
Here fool and off of the hhs cite:
“Approved applicants are granted an annual limit waiver for one year” In 2014 this disappears. It is a transitional time period.
run,
I stated a simple fact. I posted the link for the HHR details three days ago.
You come along and pretend that I stated something other than that simple fact.
You’re a liar.
Fuck these Republican aSSHOLES.. I want some money to spend.
Fuck these Republican aSSHOLES.. I want some money to spend.
Fuck these Republican aSSHOLES.. I want some money to spend.
Alot of people think we are doomed, but there are still great ways to make money. Even while the economy is collapsing around us.
I subscribe to the guy from australia and his FFT economic newsletter at http://www.forecastfortomorrow.com that guy has called many big events before they have happend, including the stock market crash in 2008 and the current financial collapse of the US. (currently happening) I found him from a friend last year, and he has some important work.
His oil calls are insane, and I have been making good money with them. He is well worth a look, if you want to keep two steps ahead of the sheeple out there.
I am worried about my financial future. Is anyone else nervous out there?
“I am worried about my financial future. Is anyone else nervous out there?
Today, 11:28:03 PM” – Flag – Like – Reply uH yea. Kelly, I have been worried for a very long time.Bin Laden is not our worst enemy. The inteligencia in oure midst is.
Harvard, Yale, Sucky, MIT, Suck my .. Obama, are about to suggest that they really don’t have to pay us back for blowing the retirement money they spent. (SS). We need to be very worried.
– Delete – Edit – Moderate
“I am worried about my financial future. Is anyone else nervous out there?
Today, 11:28:03 PM” – Flag – Like – Reply uH yea. Kelly, I have been worried for a very long time.Bin Laden is not our worst enemy. The inteligencia in oure midst is.
Harvard, Yale, Sucky, MIT, Suck my .. Obama, are about to suggest that they really don’t have to pay us back for blowing the retirement money they spent. (SS). We need to be very worried.
– Delete – Edit – Moderate
“I am worried about my financial future. Is anyone else nervous out there?
Today, 11:28:03 PM” – Flag – Like – Reply uH yea. Kelly, I have been worried for a very long time.Bin Laden is not our worst enemy. The inteligencia in oure midst is.
Harvard, Yale, Sucky, MIT, Suck my .. Obama, are about to suggest that they really don’t have to pay us back for blowing the retirement money they spent. (SS). We need to be very worried.
– Delete – Edit – Moderate
As my Dad dies. A Silver recipient and two Bronze medals for valor (never said a word) and a Purple Heart (shot in the face in Schitten Germany 1945), Steward for the Teamsters Local ( I’m not sure). I am sure that Butte , Monatana is the Home of Miners Union Local # 1. That is where I grew up. Country.
As my Dad dies. A Silver recipient and two Bronze medals for valor (never said a word) and a Purple Heart (shot in the face in Schitten Germany 1945), Steward for the Teamsters Local ( I’m not sure). I am sure that Butte , Monatana is the Home of Miners Union Local # 1. That is where I grew up. Country.
MG:
Your simple fact:
“The Obama Administration has already provided new healthcare law waivers to 222 employers, insurance companies, and unions.”
is cherry-picked and meant to create the illusion that these waviers are permanent which they clearly are not. The waviers are meant to allow companies an opportunity to adjust there insurance plans. If they do not do so by 2014 after getting multiple extensions till then, they will pay penalties for not doing.
I called you on this point in post and it applies to your earlier post implying the same as well. Keep up with the name calling which is typical for a frayster who is caught on the facts. Smiling here . . . .
Keep trying.
MG:
Your simple fact:
“The Obama Administration has already provided new healthcare law waivers to 222 employers, insurance companies, and unions.”
is cherry-picked and meant to create the illusion that these waviers are permanent which they clearly are not. The waviers are meant to allow companies an opportunity to adjust their insurance plans. If they do not do so by 2014 after getting multiple extensions till then, they will pay penalties for not changing their insurance policies.
I called you on this point in this post and it applies to your earlier post implying the same as well. That I didn’t call you out on the other post is of no consequence as I was busy working in one of those capacity constrained industries. Keep up with the name calling as it enhances your reputation further and is typical for a frayster who is caught on the facts. Smiling here . . . . 🙂
Keep trying.
run,
You’re dishonesty is something else. I wouldn’t have expected that from you, but will be aware of it in the future.
I posted that information previously because Webb said that the only waiver pending before the HHR was one for the State of Maine. That wasn’t the case.
Try keeping up.
It’s the official record from the HHR.
Your phony claims on this thread are absurd.
run,
You’re dishonesty is something else. I wouldn’t have expected that from you, but will be aware of it in the future.
I posted that information previously because Webb said that the only waiver pending before the HHR was one for the State of Maine. That wasn’t the case.
Try keeping up.
It’s the official record from the Department of Health & Human Services. Nothing more and nothing less.
Your phony claims on this thread are absurd. You’re telling outright lies.