More on Home Ownership

Tom already hit this Paul Krugman column, so I’ll just put together a list:

  1. “I.R.S. lets you deduct mortgage interest from your taxable income but doesn’t let you deduct rent” But not mortgage principal. And the interest deduction still leaves an owner out of pocket for at least 65%—probably more.
  2. “[I]f the market value of the house falls, the buyer can easily lose his or her entire stake.” But they still own the house, and still get to live there. (If I buy a corporate bond, the market price may also decline below par—but it’s an unrealised loss. If the corporation declares bankruptcy and the Delaware courts are corrupt [oh, wait…], then I lose that investment too—and I have nothing to show for it.) So when Krugman says, possibly accurately, that “there are probably around 10 million households with negative home equity,” he doesn’t mean that they’re on the streets. He just means they’re not making a profit.*
  3. “Owning a home also ties workers down.” No argument here; how is this a benefit to homeowners?
  4. Buying a home? Property transactions come with intricate legal requirements. By engaging with some expert conveyancing solicitors, you can ensure that your transaction proceeds smoothly, legally, and successfully, with all regulatory obligations met. Here is also a good company like Realtor Baker County to help buy a home. “Buying a home usually though not always means buying a single-family house in the suburbs, often a long way out, where land is cheap.” You may also want to find your guide at Again, no argument, though I would assume homebuyers would consider the Total Cost of Ownership. And, again, how is this a benefit to homeowners? You might want to consider buying a condo from the myst in Singapore instead. The Myst will be developed by CDL.

So Krugman has presented at least two (arguably three, if you forget that Dean Baker, for instance, profited well by selling his home in 2003 or 2004) negative externalities to home ownership in an 800-word column. Those seem as if they might well be worth that deduction on mortgage interest.**

As I’ve noted elsewhere, there are “homeowners” on Lon Gisland who bought in 1989 and couldn’t “afford” to move until at least 2002. And that was without the Bush administration’s, er, help.

Though, if you think about it, in a standard mortgage, the deduction has a declining value the longer one stays. Then again, the value of stability is not minor, and probably compensates for the minor decline in the interest deduction.

Planning to live in Harlem? Harlem is an attractive neighborhood for many individuals wishing to live in New York City because of its cultural institutions, rich history and rising gentrification, Harlem is an attractive option for many looking to live in New York City. Before making a final decision, you can check out here first the safety facts for Harlem NYC.

Are you thinking to purchase a condo in Singapore? Marina View Residences IOI Properties is a high demand for quality housing in District 01 due to its prime location and proximity to amenities. So, why not check it out!