…question of the US. v China but government that are in dependent partnerships with ‘no-longer-national’ capital — which ultimately boils down to labor v capital, and this capital must control…

…is not so good as the previous “International Capitalism.” Since he noted that “International Capitalism”; is synonymous with “the Washington Consensus,” this leaves him having damned China with very faint…

…come (if it comes) through regulation as the new systemic risk council oversees bank issues and decides whether activities of banks pose sufficient risk to be regulated or eliminated. Capital…

…of choice that imposed significant budgetary demands. The wealthy have fought for laws that favor them–deregulation, zero capital gains taxation, lower corporate taxes, the ability to offshore businesses and assets…

…extend the expensing of capital investments yet again. This is not just puny, but also “been there, done that” and no magnificant new job creation was forthcoming. Businesses only need…

…paying their fair share just because they have lots of capital), (ii) missed the point entirely of my fellow Angry Bear Tom Bozzo’s post , which suggested it worth noting…

…what is necessary to get out of that category. That of course is structural reform, but we got no acknowledgment of that as an aim. And aside from raising capital…

…tax on dividends and tax on capital gains. Once again we have our old friend ‘double taxation’ along with arguments that taxes on these simply reduce motivation for re-investment. Well…

…starts from the characterization of the economy as a capitalist economy with expensive capital assets and a complex, sophisticated financial system. This Keynes “veil of money” is different from the…

…capital spending the capital stock is higher than it would be if the Government hadn’t invested in infrastructure. Fama’s conclusion is false if one assumes the classical model unless one…