…more this year than in the previous two years, but the number is still tiny, and is normally dwarfed by right-wing terrorism: Source What is true is that right-wing terrorism…

…statute; they’re creating their own “jurisdictional” law in contravention of federal jurisdictional statute. (The Rooker-Feldman doctrine was created in a 5-4 opinion in 1983 that purported to interpret a part…

…Montana campaign-expenditure statute. Six to one, they upheld the constitutionality of the Montana statute. The seventh justice dissented because of Citizens United’s clear mandate, but trashed the finding of fact…

…heart of much, or most, of the statute. The specific case that the Supreme Court agreed to hear is the one decided last August by the Atlanta-based 11th Circuit Court…

…per week to 60. The Court said the statute violated the ‘liberty’ guarantee in the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause because it removed what the Court said was the constitutional…

…ruled the entire statute constitutional. And he’ll eventually defend the statute’s constitutionality in the Supreme Court. Enough said. I’m pretty sure of it. By which I mean that the case…

…statute, ostensibly on behalf of its residents, since the statute doesn’t affect the rights of the state itself. In the Liberty U. case, the federal-funding-of-abortions grounds for constitutional challenge is…

…the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the statute that is the main federal statute that provides for access to federal court in order to challenge the…

…the last example, because the procedural statute at issue favors corporations; that’s the statute’s purpose.) In fairness to Roberts, this see-no-evil-bald-violation-of-Congressional-subject-matter-jurisdiction-prerogative thing predates Roberts’ tenure on the Court, and–at least…

…the remedy is worse than the evil. It makes it worse. Why is it not more apt to anticipate and provide for reform? Why does it not cherish its wise…