Heathcare Insurance Companies Abandoning Medicare Advantage redux

There are changes coming to the Medicare market place and Medicare Advantage. Healthcare Insurance companies are leaving the Medicare Advantage market.

“Market exits by Humana, Aetna, and UnitedHealthcare will collectively affect nearly 70% of those 1.8 million individuals.”

The remainder of the 1.8 million will be looking at new plans with the same insurance provider. The market consisting of people exiting their old Medicare Advantage plans “may” be faced with joining new companies or having to transition back to Traditional Medicare.

The cancellation of Medicare Advantage plans started late last year with the dates set in 2025. Profit seems to be the issue mostly and the cancellation is selective to certain areas of the US. The other issue is working with MA plans, some are more rigid than others and look to cut back on services.

– by Emma Curchin, Brandon Novak, and Peter Hart

The quasi-privatized system called “Medicare Advantage,” otherwise known as Part C, was created in 2003 as a means of expanding the role of private sector corporations in the publicly funded Medicare system. Proponents claimed it would lower costs and improve health care for seniors. It has achieved neither of those goals, Instead, MA has become a wildly profitable scheme for private insurance giants. They have become adept at taking advantage of Medicare’s billing model to claim exorbitant profits. At this point, MA is more profitable for many companies than their conventional insurance businesses.

And the program continues to grow. MA now has more enrollees than traditional Medicare, thanks in no small part to aggressive public relations campaigns that sell seniors on the idea that the plans cut costs and increase choice. Congress has simultaneously failed to plug the holes in traditional Medicare, pushing seniors towards MA to avoid high out-of-pocket costs. Policymakers can fill these gaps and guarantee true comprehensive coverage simply by redirecting the overpayments to MA insurers into Medicare.

Numerous studies and media investigations have documented the problems with Medicare Advantage. What follows is a collection of some of the most notable figures documenting the high costs of this failed experiment in privatizing Medicare.

$35 billion
The amount that MedPAC estimates taxpayers will overpay MA insurers this year through ‘favorable selection,’ the practice of targeting healthy seniors for their plans.

78 percent
The percentage of physicians in a 2023 American Medical Association survey who said that Medicare Advantage’s prior authorization processes caused a recommended treatment for a patient to be abandoned.

$6 billion
One estimate of the amount spent in 2022 on the marketing companies that work to attract new subscribers in Medicare Advantage plans.

$1,730
The gross profit margin posted by MA companies in 2021 – more than double their profit margin on the individual market.

Some up-to-date 2024 Medicare MA information.

Medicare spends an estimated 22 percent more for MA enrollees than it would spend if they were enrolled in FFS Medicare. The difference translates into a projected $83 billion in 2024. The Commission acknowledges that a portion of these increased payments to MA plans are used to provide more generous supplemental benefits and better financial protection for MA enrollees. Table 12-3 (p. 371) includes a detailed breakdown of those benefits. Nevertheless, the Commission is concerned the relatively higher payments to MA plans are subsidized by the taxpayers and beneficiaries who fund the program. Higher MA spending increases Part B premiums for all beneficiaries (including those in FFS who do not have access to the supplemental benefits offered by MA plans). The Commission estimates those premiums will be about $13 billion higher in 2024 because of higher MA spending. Further, the Commission is concerned that policies leading to higher MA payments do not adequately address issues distorting the nature of plan competition in MA.

“MA rebates for conventional plans have more than doubled since 2018”

For 2024, rebates for conventional MA plans—excluding employer plans and SNPs—average $194 per enrollee per month ($2,329 annually per enrollee; $2,142 after subtracting plan projections for administrative costs and profit), a slight decrease from the record high $196 per enrollee per month in 2023 (Figure 12-2, p. 370). When including SNPs, rebates reached a record high of $209 per enrollee per month in 2024—a slight increase from $206 per enrollee per month in 2023 (data not shown). These rebates account for 17 percent of plan payments, unchanged from 2023 (data not shown). The average MA rebate among conventional plans has more than doubled since 2018.

“Conventional MA Plans project that rebates will be used to reduce cost sharing, reduce Part B and Part D premiums, and offer non-Medicare benefits in 2024.”

“Higher MA payments to what estimated spending would have been in FFS 2007-2024”

“Coding and Selection have Increased MA Payments above what Spending would have been in FFS”

“Est. Impact of Coding Intensity on MA Risk Scores was larger than Coding Adjustment, 2007-2024”

“Uncorrected MA Coding Intensity has increased Payments to Plans by an estimated $124 Billion through 2022 and is projected to generate nearly $94 billion more in 2023 and 2024”