Recent WSJ subscription article on China and it trying to reverse its one-child per couple policy. Evidently the policy is leaving the country with a growing elderly population with no younger replacements to follow. It will now implement subsidies to encourage larger families to reverse the demographic decline of its own design. The Communist Party owns this one for a successful policy in reversing population growth.

Wall Street Journal Editorial Board

Chinese Finance Minister Lan Foan disappointed investors in a press conference last Saturday that offered few details about a fiscal stimulus for the sputtering economy. We’ll discuss the merits of such a plan when details emerge, but meanwhile a startling line caught our eye concerning the consequences of the country’s former one-child policy.

Mr. Foan said in particular the package “will respond to the changing situation of China’s population development” (according to a translation prepared by state media journalist Fred Gao). This is consistent with a Reuters report that Beijing is considering a monthly subsidy of around 800 yuan per child for a family’s second and third children.

What a stunning reversal. For decades Beijing enforced a one-child policy that was ghastly in the way only an authoritarian regime can achieve. The human cost was incalculable, particularly on Chinese parents subject to forced abortions or sterilizations. The social consequences have been catastrophic as sex-selective abortions skewed the population in favor of males and successive generations of Chinese have grown up without siblings, aunts or uncles.

Communist Party leaders will never admit to any of that, but even they recognize the policy has been an economic disaster. Intended to prevent the population from expanding beyond what a developing economy could support, the effect has been nearer the opposite. China’s aging and soon-to-be shrinking population is now an impediment to economic growth.

President Xi Jinping abandoned the one-child policy in 2016, and in 2021 the Party allowed parents to have up to three children. Apparently this isn’t having the desired effect, so now Beijing may attempt natalist subsidies. The problem for Beijing is that these subsidies haven’t worked anywhere they’ve been tried.

Prosperity has reduced child-bearing across the developed world, but democracies let nature and individual choice take their course. China’s Communist Party chose brutal coercion, with damaging consequences that are likely to persist for the foreseeable future. Chalk up another defeat for central planning—and for Western intellectuals who wished we could be more like China.

~~~~~~~

If the issue is having adequate Labor to replace present workers, child-bearing replacement would have a lengthy timetable to build a labor force. However, labor content has been reduced to a smaller portion of products than what it used to be. Immigration would speed the process up sooner. Not sure how receptive China would be.

The US faces a similar issue with a 1.6 ratio. More people would like to immigrate to the US than they would to China.