What if ACA Subsidies are Not Extended in AZ?

As a former Michigan resident (now residing in another state), I know of Charles rather well having exchanged emails once and a while. I also read his commentary on ACA Signups.

He is also a resident of Michigan when we were living there. If I did not have an answer on healthcare, I would go to him for the answer. Charles has taken on the task of telling people or warning people about the increasing ACA payments will be if the subsidy is dropped to 400% FPL from its present 600% FPL. Tru_p and Republicans have no plans to pass legislation to keep it at 600% FPL. Keep in mind too, the Tru_p and Republican plan is to disenfranchise millions of people who can not afford ACA healthcare insurance by cutting them from access to Medicaid. A rough calculation of the detrimental impact of the numbers of people impacted is 15 to 20 million citizens.

“How much more will ~430,000 Arizona residents pay if the enhanced ACA subsidies are not extended? (updated),” Charles Gaba at ACA Signups.

Arizona has around 423,000 residents enrolled in ACA exchange plans. Eighty-eight percent (88%) of whom are currently subsidized. I estimate they also have perhaps another ~8,000 unsubsidized off-exchange enrollees.

Combined, that’s 5.6% of their total population.

Assuming the national average 6.6% net enrollment attrition rate thru April reported by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services applies to Arizona, however, that would knock the current enrollment down to more like 477,000 statewide.

In early 2021, Congressional Democrats & President Biden passed the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), which dramatically expanded & enhanced the original premium subsidy formula of the Affordable Care Act, finally bringing the financial aid sliding income scale up to the level it should have been in the first place over a decade earlier. They then extended the subsidy upgrade out by another 3 years via the Inflation Reduction Act.

In addition to beefing up the subsidies along the entire 100 – 400% Federal Poverty Level (FPL) income scale, the upgrade eliminated the much-maligned “Subsidy Cliff” at 400% FPL, wherein a household earning even $1 more than that had all premium subsidies cut off immediately, requiring middle-class families to pay full price for individual market health insurance policies.

Unfortunately, the improved subsidies are currently scheduled to end effective December 31, 2025.  Needless to say, with Republicans holding a trifecta, it’s highly unlikely that the IRA’s enhanced subsidies are going to be extended further. They had the opportunity to do so as part of H.R. 1 (the so-called “Big Beautiful Bill”), but chose not to.

It gets even worse:

In addition, the so-called “Affordability & Integrity Rule” put into place by RFK Jr., & Dr. Oz at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is causing 2026 subsidies to be even less generous and gross premiums to increase even more.

In Arizona specifically, all of this will result in average gross premiums hikes of a whopping 46.3%.

I decided to run the numbers myself to get an idea of just how much the combination of expiring IRA subsidies and the CMS “Affordability/Integrity Rule” will cause net premiums to increase starting in January 2026.

I’m using four household scenarios, at several different income levels for each:

• a 50-yr old single adult earning between $20K – $70K/year
• a 30-yr old single parent w/an 8-yr old child, earning between $20K – $90K/year
• a 40-yr old couple w/2 children age 15 & 12, earning between $40K – $130K/year
• a 64-yr old couple earning between $20K – $90K/year

There are caveats involved here.

• The average Benchmark Silver ACA premiums are based on 2026 levels.
• The original version of this analysis included a 4.3% increase in the unsubsidized benchmark plan premium based on a projection by the Congressional Budget Office. However, that was a national average projection which didn’t take into account other factors like increased utilization, medical inflation and so on.
• This updated version assumes the actual 2026 Arizona rate filings which average 36.1% statewide.
• Benchmark Silver premiums vary widely depending on where you live & other factors. For Arizona I’m using Phoenix.
• In some states, children under 19 are eligible for CHIP or Children’s Medicaid at a significantly higher household income level. This can cause a sudden jump in full-price premiums as the household income moves over that eligibility threshold.
• These analyses assume that the enrollees choose the benchmark Silver plan, and that the benchmark plan remains the same both years (the actual benchmark plan often changes from one year to the next).
• FINALLY: The original version of this analysis assumed that the Applicable Percentage Table would revert back to the pre-2021 levels. However, the Trump Administration recently modified the formula used to calculate this which means that ACA subsidies will be even less generous starting in 2026.

With all that understood, let’s take a look:

• A single 50-yr old earning $40,000/yr would see his premiums jump from $154/month to 298/month . . . a 93% increase.
• A single parent earning $50,000/year would go from paying $158/month to $344/month . . .nearly 2.2x as much.
• A family of four earning $70,000/year would see their premiums jump from $173/month to $436/month . . . nearly 2.5x as much.
• A 64-yr old couple earning $90,000/yr would have to shell out NEARLY $23,000 MORE PER YEAR for the same coverage . . . or FOUR TIMES as much as they’re paying this year!

There is still a chance Congressional Republicans might agree to extend the improved subsidies, but . . .

• The odds of it happening are slim.
• They would likely only agree to a watered-down version and/or would include poison pill demands of Democrats in return.
• Even if they do so, the actual rate hikes will likely already be baked in for 2026 (which would still leave unsubsidized enrollees stuck with the 20%+ rate hikes), and . . .
• Even if they do, some of the Trump Admin’s other regulatory changes would still leave ACA enrollees with higher costs (including raising the cap on out of pocket expenses by $900/yr more than it would be otherwise).