Medicaid Cuts to Hospitals
With the passage of The One Big Beautiful Bill by Republicans comes a series of problems for hospitals in the United States. Included in the hospital having issues are rural and inner-city hospitals. Many of these hospitals are caring for people with no or insufficient healthcare insurance. While Medicaid does assist many people, it does not meet the costs of providing hospital care.
At the bottom of this piece, I have provided a list of hospital closing pre-BBB. We can expect more hospital closures. The bulk of closures will occur in rural areas and mostly amongst smaller hospitals.
Such a lovely bunch, yes? Grinning while they screw over Americans.
“Diagnosing Medicaid Cuts to Hospitals in The One, Big, Beautiful Bill,” – Planrevolt.com
Since the pandemic struck the U.S., most Americans have developed a keen appreciation of their hospitals and an equal awareness of how fragile these hospital systems really are. Which is why it’s critical to understand the role that Medicaid and Medicaid State-directed payments (SDPs) play in the survival of what are known as Safety Net Hospitals. And what’s even more important is how the passage of the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act will now affect Medicaid and those SDPs, supporting these hospitals.
So what are Safety Net Hospitals and what do they do? As the name implies, these hospitals play a critical role in the U.S. Healthcare system, they are literally the lifeline for vulnerable populations, including those who are uninsured or have Medicaid. They serve as a “safety net” by offering services regardless of a patient’s ability to pay or their insurance status. These hospitals are often located in low-income communities and rural areas.
These hospitals also often operate on fragile margins (approximately 39% experience negative margins), and their reserve funds, an indicator of stability, are not comforting. Without adequate reserve funding, a hospital or nursing home is unable to function in the event of a downturn in reimbursements. Inadequate cash reserves, measured in the number of days the facility can continue operating with no or delayed income, portend the collapse or even closure of the operation.
What is the financial lifeblood for these hospitals are the aforementioned SDPs, this payment arrangement permit states under 42 CFR 438.6(c) to make supplemental payments to hospitals for Medicaid patients which can amount to even more than Medicare payment coverage. This funding is critical in covering hospital operations and when you consider that the days of cash on hand in 1 in 10 hospitals is less than 110 days, they are literally rated “Vulnerable” or worse, “Highly Vulnerable.”
The Rural Health Transformation Program
The Act does acknowledge the fragility of rural hospitals and has an initiative called The Rural Health Transformation Program which will appropriate $10 billion per fiscal year to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for fiscal years 2026-2030, for a total of $50 billion over five years to help them. But this deficit math simply doesn’t add up and even the details of their administration are vague. Adding to the problem, the The Act makes it more difficult for states to close payment shortfalls by restricting their ability to use provider taxes to boost Medicaid payments. This further limits resources for hospitals and increases financial pressure, especially in states that have used these mechanisms to support rural and Safety Net Hospitals.
According to Becker’s Hospital Review, for the first time in the last decade, the average number of days cash on hand dropped below 200 to 196.8. The upper half of U.S.-based nonprofit acute healthcare providers reported an average of 292 days, while the lower half reported an average of 128 days.
Health Workforce Layoffs and Hospital Closures
This is more than a hypothetical forecast. A recent report documents 18 hospital and emergency department closures or forced mergers so far this year. Another study found that several hospitals and health systems are reducing their workforces or jobs amid financial and operational challenges. To cite one example, Columbus (Ind.) Regional Health (CRH) notified the state that it will lay off 50 employees. The layoffs come as the health system plans to close its inpatient rehabilitation unit and the CRH Orthopedics and Sports Medicine outpatient practice, according to a news release dated June 30.
Unsurprisingly, the closures negatively affect local healthcare access with broader consequences for the community and its economy. Layoffs and closures, especially in rural or smaller communities, often result in fewer available services, longer waiting times, and, in some cases, the complete loss of essential departments, such as emergency rooms or maternity wards.
As a result of these cutbacks, medical care is compromised and everyone suffers. . With fewer staff members, remaining employees face increased workloads and higher stress, which can lead to burnout and a decline in morale. This often translates to longer wait times, rushed patient interactions, and increased risk of medical errors. Under such circumstances, healthcare workers often experience burnout, job insecurity, and increased turnover, all of which exacerbates staffing shortages and negatively impacts patient care. Many hospitals, especially those with already negative or low operating margins, may be forced to reduce services, lay off staff, or close altogether. This risk is especially acute for rural hospitals, which often operate on thin margins and heavy reliance on Medicaid funding.
Healthcare facility closures, especially in rural areas, have a ripple effect on the communities they once served because hospitals are often among the largest local employers. Workforce reductions decrease household incomes, reduce local consumer spending, and shrinking tax revenues, can jeopardize funding for schools and infrastructure. The multiplier effect means that each healthcare job supports additional jobs in related sectors such as food services, transportation, and construction.
Vulnerable populations are disproportionately affected by cutbacks, closures, and mergers of healthcare facilities. Cuts to administrative and support roles impact services for seniors, non-English speakers, and other vulnerable groups, reducing their ability to access care and navigate the health system.
In the long term, hospital closures and job cuts can result in a 14% reduction in healthcare-sector employment and may exacerbate ongoing economic decline; again, rural communities are disproportionately affected. These changes can make it harder to recruit healthcare professionals in the future, further eroding local healthcare infrastructure.
Why are smaller hospitals and rural hospitals already so vulnerable? The answer is multi-factorial, as they face financial challenges and layoffs due to a combination of structural, economic, and workforce-related factors. And there are no quick fixes that legislation can address.
With rural hospitals particularly vulnerable to Medicaid cuts, KFF analyses (formerly known as The Kaiser Family Foundation) estimate a $50–$155 billion reduction in federal Medicaid spending for these areas over the next 10 years. KFF projects more than 1.8 million rural residents will lose Medicaid coverage. Many rural hospitals may be forced to choose between maintaining services, retaining staff, or shutting down, which would cause patients to travel long distances for care.
Smaller hospitals have significant fixed costs (“keeping the lights on”) that do not scale down when they experience lower patient volume, making their cost per patient higher compared to larger hospitals. Larger hospitals benefit from economies of scale, as they spread these costs over a greater number of patients.
As noted above, rural and small hospitals typically generate less revenue and have lower occupancy rates, making them more susceptible to financial volatility and downturns. They not only lack the financial reserves but also the diverse service lines that help larger hospitals weather economic shocks.
Many small hospitals, especially in rural areas, serve a higher proportion of patients who are covered by Medicaid, Medicare, or who are uninsured. Federal payers reimburse at lower rates, often below the cost of care, resulting in chronic financial losses. Private insurers also tend to pay small hospitals less for the same services compared to larger facilities.
What compounds this even more are Medicaid cuts in the new federal budget that are expected to increase uncompensated care. The cuts are projected to increase the number of uninsured Americans by 11.8 million, ballooning uncompensated care. This will strain hospital finances, as more patients will be unable to pay for services.
Medicare cuts may be next. If the bill increases the federal deficit as projected, it could trigger approximately $500 billion in mandatory Medicare cuts, potentially resulting in a 4% reduction in payments to hospitals and other providers, unless Congress acts to prevent these cuts.
Smaller hospitals face unique workforce challenges as they struggle to attract and retain qualified healthcare professionals. Often, they rely on expensive temporary staff (locums) to fill gaps, which further increases costs. The lack of prestige, professional isolation, and fewer opportunities for advancement make recruitment and retention more difficult compared to larger, urban hospitals.
In summary, Medicaid cuts will have unintended consequences. Hospital and health system workforce reductions directly reduce healthcare access and quality for all patients, residents, destabilize local economies, and create a cycle of declining health and economic outcomes, especially in rural and underserved areas. Hospitals with high shares of Medicaid patients, particularly in rural and low-income urban areas, will be the most affected and may face existential threats due to the combined effects of coverage losses, reduced payments, and increased uncompensated care.
22 Hospital Closures in 2025
September 11, 2025, Beckers Hospital Closures
1. Landmark Hospital of Cape Girardeau (Mo.), a long-term acute care facility, has shared plans to close “in the coming weeks” over “unsustainable healthcare market conditions.”
2. Phoenix-based Banner Health has shared plans to end emergency services at its Loveland, Colo.-based Banner McKee Medical Center on Nov. 5 as the facility is converted to a specialty hospital.
3. Willows, Calif.-based Glenn Medical Center plans to close its emergency department, with the hospital closing shortly after, following CMS’ plan to revoke its critical access hospital designation, effective Oct. 21. Lauren Still, GMC hospital administrator, also confirmed with Becker’s that while GMC has a path forward to preserve its primary care and specialty clinics, the ED and hospital services will end.
4. Chicago-based Weiss Memorial Hospital closed the morning of Aug. 8 amid CMS’ plan to terminate its Medicare program participation on Aug. 9.
5. Rockford, Ill.-based Javon Bea Hospital-Rockton has closed after Rockford-based Mercyhealth filed a “temporary suspension of services” with the state.
6. St. Louis-based St. Luke’s Des Peres Hospital, a 143-bed acute care facility, closed on Aug. 1 due to low utilization and increased financial pressures.
7. Stilwell (Okla.) Memorial Hospital and its clinic shuttered, ABC affiliate KTUL reported June 21. An employee told the news outlet the hospital closed June 27 and the clinic will shut down 30 days later.
8. Moulton, Ala.-based Lawrence Medical Center permanently shuttered its emergency department on May 23.
9. Upland, Pa.-based Crozer Health closed its Crozer-Chester Medical Center in Upland on May 2.
10. Crozer Health closed its Ridley Park, Pa.-based Taylor Hospital on April 26. Around 2,651 employees across two Crozer hospitals and its other facilities were laid off from April 25 to May 2.
11. Mid Coast Medical Center Trinity (Texas) closed April 25, after attempting to secure facility long-term sustainability and financial stability for months.
12. Heritage Valley Kennedy Hospital in Kennedy Township, Pa., closed on June 30 due to reduced insurance reimbursements and declining patient volume.
13. Insight Hospital and Medical Center Trumbull in Warren, Ohio, paused its inpatient, outpatient and emergency room services March 27 for the foreseeable future amid ongoing bankruptcy and financial disruptions from former owner Dallas-based Steward Health Care.
14. East Ohio Regional Hospital, a 140-bed healthcare facility in Martins Ferry, closed March 20. In late June, the hospital was acquired by 360 Healthcare and is expected to reopen this fall.
15. St. Louis-based Homer G. Phillips Memorial Hospital’s board of directors voluntarily surrendered its hospital license March 17 to the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services and closed.
16. Brewer, Maine-based Northern Light Health has shared closed Northern Light Inland Hospital in Waterville and its associated services and clinics on May 27.
17. Ascension St. Elizabeth in Chicago closed in mid-February prior to Ontario, Calif.-based Prime Healthcare’s acquisition of it and eight other St. Louis-based Ascension hospitals in Illinois.
18. New York City-based Mount Sinai’s Beth Israel closed April 9 after months of legal back and fourth with the Community Coalition to Save Beth Israel Hospital to keep the hospital open.
19. Irving, Texas-based Christus Health shuttered its Christus Santa Rosa Hospital-Medical Center in San Antonio on April 25, and consolidate care to nearby system hospitals.
20. Washington, D.C.-based United Medical Center closed April 15 and laid off 485 employees. The closure will be timed with the opening of Washington, D.C.-based Cedar Hill Regional Medical Center, which will start seeing patients April 15.
21. Orlando (Fla.) Health shuttered Rockledge Hospital and four hospital-based outpatient departments on April 22.
22. Pauls Valley, Okla.-based Valley Community Hospital closed Jan. 8. The 43-bed facility had reopened in 2021 after shuttering for three years. It was also forced to end online rumors of closure in January 2024 after multiple complaints led to the closure of its laboratory and relocation of laboratory services to Norman (Okla.) Regional Hospital.


The BBB does not screw over all US citizens; just those below the top decile of income distribution. Those in the top decile of income are effectively elites albeit mostly petite elites knowing roughly half as much as one should know to qualify for the full benefits of citizenship including the right to vote. However in our elitist socioeconomic system then the unknowing rubes enable the political elite that encumber our republic into viable political powers. Neither of our political parties could could survive a well informed electorate.
@RC,
LOL! And when during our entire nation’s history has the electorate ever been well-informed?