Associating Microplastics in Mice and Humans
We eat a lot of different products that are packaged in plastic packaging. Plastic content leaches into the water we drink from product packaging and throwaway garbage. Unless you are filtering it out in some fashion such as reverse osmosis or another membrane type of filter, microplastic content can buildup in humans.
~~~~~~~
Scientists observe decreased motor function in rodents exposed to microplastics.
Microplastics can move through mice brains and block blood vessels, essentially mimicking blood clots that could potentially be fatal or otherwise disrupt brain function.
The findings are detailed in a peer-reviewed paper for which researchers for the first time used real-time imaging to track bits of plastic as they moved through and accumulated in brain blood vessels. When one piece of plastic got stuck, others accumulated behind it, like a “car crash”, the authors reported.
The authors then found decreased motor function in those mice exposed to microplastics, suggesting impacts on the brain. While mounting evidence has linked microplastics to neurotoxicity, the research is the first to suggest how – it probably reduces blood flow.
“This revelation offers a lens through which to comprehend the toxicological implications of microplastics that invade the bloodstream,” the Peking University authors wrote.
Microplastics are tiny bits of plastic either intentionally added to consumer goods, or which are products of larger plastics breaking down. The particles contain any number of 20,000 plastic chemicals, of which thousands, such as BPA, phthalates and Pfas, present serious health risks.
The substance has been found throughout the human body, can cross the placental, and the brain barriers. Recent research found microplastics to be accumulating in human brains at much higher levels than eight years ago. The substance is linked to an increased risk of heart attack and cancer, and is considered to be a neurotoxicant that can cause multiple forms of brain dysfunction, such as Parkinson’s disease.
Until now, very little has been understood about how the bits of plastic move through brains, and why they might cause some disease and neurotoxicity.
To track the plastic in the mice brains in real time, researchers gave them water filled with fluorescent-coated polystyrene, a common material found in household goods and packaging. Using an imaging technique called two-photon microscopy, they were able to watch how, within just a few hours, the fluorescent bits began appearing in the brain.
Researchers suspect that immune cells had, in effect, absorbed the bits of plastic, creating irregular-shaped cells. As the cells traveled the tiny brain cortex vessels where there are generally more and tighter bends, they sometimes became lodged. Larger bits of plastic were more prone to getting stuck.
When cells did get lodged, more cells would pile on, mimicking the effect of cars in a pile-up accident. The blockages reduced blood flow and sometimes broke up after a few days or weeks, but some persisted beyond the closure of the study’s four-week observation period.
In behavioral assessments following exposure to microplastic, the exposed mice traveled slower and shorter distances than those who were not exposed, and performed poorly on a maze test that gauges memory function.
However, the authors stressed that it was unclear if the same effects would happen in a human brain because the vessels are not quite as small as those in mice, and blood volume and flow rate are greater. Still, it strongly pointed to serious cardiovascular and brain health risks, and “increased investment in this area of research is urgent and essential to fully comprehend the health risks posed by microplastics in human blood”, the authors wrote.
Microplastics can block blood vessels in mice brains, researchers find | Plastics | The Guardian, Tom Perkins.

I think we have not paid enough attention to the human generated chemicals we have dumped into the environment and how it is changing ours and the planets biology/physiology.
In school on a public health final there was an open question of will we solve cancer. My answer: no because we are changing the environment continually which is continually causing physiologic and chemical responses by the body. Yes, we get snapshots of the moment but tomorrow is a new day.
On another general understanding of humans, a gene has been isolated that is unique to humans and involved in our ability to talk as we do. When inserted into mice, their voicing changed. Doesn’t mean mice would be able to talk but shows that this gene only found in humans is part of what makes us what we are.
@Daniel,
Humans and chimpanzees share approximately 98-99% of their DNA; the vast majority of genes are shared between the two species. What makes us different is not human-specific genes, it’s a combination of variants in those shared genes and differences in how the genes are regulated.
Yes, thank your for the clarification however, the article on Science Friday presented it as unique to humans. This article notes it as a specific variant to homo sapiens. Not found in ” the Neanderthals and Denisovans. It turns out that neither of those relatives carried the same version of NOVA1″
So, SF was not as specific as they should be for a science show. Then again not exactly wrong.
“We think it’s hard science that NOVA[1] has an entirely human-specific variant that no other species we know of ever had,” Darnell said, “and we can correlate that variant with changes in vocalization and language.”
‘Speech gene’ seen only in modern humans may have helped us evolve to talk | Live Science
This article from the university of the two researchers: The Rockefeller University » Researchers identify a gene potentially linked to the evolution of spoken language
@Daniel,
The distinction here is between a unique “gene” and unique “variant.” Lay people tend to be sloppy about this. As an example, there is no such thing as the “sickle cell gene.” People with sickle cell trait or sickle cell disease carry a specific mutation/variant/allele in the human beta globin gene. All of us have the beta globin gene.
Per your link, Bob Darnell’s group described a unique mutation/variant/allele at the NOVA1 gene/locus, not a unique human-specific gene. There is a version (orthodox) of the NOVA1 gene in mice. So the experiment wasn’t to insert the NOVA1 gene into mice, it was to edit the existing mouse NOVA1 to contain the human-specific mutation/variant/allele.
Daniel:
I definitely agree with you Daniel.
I think you are mostly correct than in error. The year before we started our move from Michigan to the Southwest, it became known of high levels in ground water of PFAS. This led to warnings of not eating the fish in the lakes in Livingston County as well as other counties east and south of us such as where Ann Arbor is located Washtenaw. Ann Arbor was already suffering from the pollution cause by Gelman Sciences. 1.4-dioxane was sprayed on the lawns of Gelman Sciences with the belief being exposed to sunlight it would break down the dioxane. This was the supposed belief of the company owner, Charles Gelman. Of course, it did not happen as planned.
Washtenaw County and the EPA have closed down many of the residential wells as the plumes have showed up in the drinking water. Test wells are showing a migration of the water towards the Huron River. It is a pretty and well =wooded place.
Parker-Hannifin had a facility in Des Plaines, IL which made hydraulic and air activated cylinders with a piston rod coming out of one end. A big business for machine tool applications. The piston rods were chrome plated. The waste product was dumped in the back acreage, It too got into the ground water.
PFAS are also in fire extinguishing foam. Many firemen have suffered from exposure.
Just a few thoughts of what I have seen in Michigan and Illinois. and also read. Michigan has a big PFAS issue.