Large Percentage of Rural Hospitals Are at Risk of Closure

What if you had an accident and the closest Emergency Room was over 30 minutes away or what if you were sick and there were no physicians or hospital beds in your community? Millions of Americans are facing this situation because rural hospitals are being forced to close.

As told by CHQPR, more than 700 rural hospitals in the U.S. are at risk of closing due to their financial woes. For more than half of these hospitals, the risk of closure is immediate, according to a CHQPR report. The report claims this is due largely to inadequate reimbursement from health Insurance plans.

Nearly every state has rural hospitals at risk of shutting their doors for good. The five that don’t have such a crisis are Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, Rhode Island and Utah. In more than half of the states, a quarter or more of rural hospitals are at risk of closure. In nine states, the majority of rural hospitals are at risk.

Rural hospitals’ dire financial woes are a result mainly of inadequate reimbursement from health insurance plans, the CHQPR report claims. It is often more expensive to deliver healthcare in rural areas because of smaller patient volumes, costs of treatment, and higher staff costs in rural areas. 

While some people may assume private insurers pay more than Medicare and Medicaid, the opposite is true for rural hospitals, CHQPR CEO Harold Miller told MedCity News last year. He said that in many cases, Medicare is the most lucrative payer for a rural hospital. Miller Declares . . .

“Private health plans actually pay them well below a rural hospital cost and well below what they pay their larger hospitals. One of the biggest drivers of rural hospital losses is the payments they receive from private health plans.”

Many rural hospitals just do not have enough revenue from other sources to offset these losses, the report stated. Some rural hospitals have managed to add some balance to their losses through things like grants and local tax revenues in the past However, there is uncertainty about the sustainability of such funding sources and whether they will be enough to cope with escalating costs.

Healthcare providers seem to be growing more and more dissatisfied with the fact that payer reimbursement isn’t keeping up with these rapidly growing costs. 

CHQPR’s report also highlighted that rural hospitals usually have low financial reserves. This means they don’t have enough net assets. Those assets other than buildings and equipment, minus debt are not enough to make up for losses on patient services for more than a few years.

In order to prevent closures that will inevitably strip rural Americans of their access to care, CHQPR argued that private insurers need to boost their payments to rural hospitals. Increasing payments to a level that ensures endangered hospitals remain operational would cost about $5 billion annually — and this payment boost would account for merely 0.10% of total national healthcare spending, according to the report.

The report also called for health plans to issue standby capacity payments for rural hospitals. People in rural communities count on local hospitals to be there for them if they get injured or experience a sudden health problem. The rural hospitals are not paid for maintaining that availability as the report pointed out.

It also noted that rural hospital closures pose a grave threat to the country’s food supply and energy production because farms, ranches, mines, drilling sites, wind farms and solar energy facilities are primarily situated in rural regions. Without access to adequate healthcare services, these industries will struggle to attract and retain the necessary workforce, the report stated.

The Crisis in Rural Health Care – Saving Rural Hospitals, CHQPR

Data on Urban and Rural Hospitals – Saving Rural Hospitals CHQPR