Medicaid Eligibility Is Based On Current Monthly Income
Just in case, you missed it, Medicaid Eligibility Is Based On Current Monthly Income. Still do not understand? Let me try a different way to explain it, Medicaid Eligibility Is Based On Current Monthly Income.
There, I have said it three times – once in the title and twice in the beginning text of this post. And yet people will not apply because it is something others do or they are easily discouraged or the information is hidden. If you are laid off and have no income, you could qualify for Medicaid regardless if you are collecting unemployment or received the extra $600 (not counted in calculation) or made good money beforehand. For Medicaid, you or you and your family still must be below 138% FPL in Expansion states or 100% FPL in non-Expansion states.
In an Urban Institute base scenario estimate of 20 percent unemployment; ~ 25 million people will lose ESI coverage. Of the 25 million; 12 million could gain Medicaid coverage, 6 million could gain ACA Marketplace coverage or other private coverage, and 7 million could become uninsured. What is important to understand is if you lose your current monthly income, you could qualify for Medicaid in a Medicaid expansion and non expansion states.
Some detail:
By visiting the home page of any ACA exchange, you will find the exchanges were conceived as a market place for private plans. This creates an impression it is what everyone wants, will seek, and easily find. The sites are hiding another product that two thirds of “customers” could and should end up “buying (almost free)” called Medicaid. Those who fill out an application will be routed to Medicaid if eligible and if they accurately report current monthly income and not annual income. Due to misdirection, many visitors to the exchanges may never get to the Medicaid area. Other than lack of emphasis on Medicaid, or failure to post the eligibility criteria, ACA Healthcare exchange messaging and structure can cause people to miss their Medicaid eligibility in at least two ways.
The extra $600/week in unemployment benefits provided by the CARES Act causes some to include that extra income in their income estimate. For ACA Healthcare marketplace coverage this is correct; however, for Medicaid – the Cares Act extra $600 does not count in qualifying for Medicaid coverage. The Maryland exchange has a page that does a nice job explaining how to handle this on the actual application: add the $600 to the annual income estimate (ACA) , but not to the monthly income estimate (Medicaid). You have to get to this page first and decide if applying is worthwhile. The screening tool, unlike the application, does not ask for monthly as well as annual income and it may mislead. This is a problem.
The second problem is information about Special Enrollment Periods (SEPs) are relevant to the ACA marketplace coverage but not Medicaid. You have a specified 60 day period of time in which to enroll for ACA coverage after losing your job (not Medicaid). The message “Uninsured Marylanders (example) can enroll for ACA coverage by June 15” does not specify the ACA marketplace and excludes Medicaid (as it should). Medicaid enrollment is available year-round.
States need to emphasize Medicaid enrollment more as many who are unemployed due to Covid would qualify. Make sure you visit xpostfactoid blog as Andrew expands on this topic. Also rather than going to the ACA healthcare sites, one could go to the state Medicaid sites directly and enroll.
What is Not Found on ACA Exchanges, xpostfactoid, June 14, 2020
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/16/health/coronavirus-insurance-healthcare.html
June 16, 2020
Why People Are Still Avoiding the Doctor (It’s Not the Virus)
At first, people delayed medical care for fear of catching Covid. But as the pandemic caused staggering unemployment, medical care has become unaffordable for many.
By Reed Abelson
At first, Kristina Hartman put off getting medical care out of concern about the coronavirus. But then she lost her job as an administrator at a truck manufacturer in McKinney, Texas.
While she still has health insurance, she worries about whether she will have coverage beyond July, when her unemployment is expected to run out.
“It started out as a total fear of going to the doctor,” she said.
“I definitely am avoiding appointments.”
Ms. Hartman, who is 58, skipped a regular visit with her kidney doctor, and has delayed going to the endocrinologist to follow up on some abnormal lab results.
While hospitals and doctors across the country say many patients are still shunning their services out of fear of contagion — especially with new cases spiking — Americans who lost their jobs or have a significant drop in income during the pandemic are now citing costs as the overriding reason they do not seek the health care they need.
“We are seeing the financial pressure hit,” said Dr. Bijoy Telivala, a cancer specialist in Jacksonville, Fla. “This is a real worry,” he added, explaining that people are weighing putting food on the table against their need for care. “You don’t want a 5-year-old going hungry.”
Among those delaying care, he said, was a patient with metastatic cancer who was laid off while undergoing chemotherapy. He plans to stop treatments while he sorts out what to do when his health insurance coverage ends in a month.
The twin risks in this crisis — potential infection and the cost of medical care — have become daunting realities for the millions of workers who were furloughed, laid off or caught in the economic downturn. It echoes the scenarios that played out after the 2008 recession, when millions of Americans were unemployed and unable to afford even routine visits to the doctor for themselves or their children.
Almon Castor’s hours were cut at the steel distribution warehouse in Houston where he works about a month ago. Worried that a dentist might not take all the precautions necessary, he had been avoiding a root canal.
But the expense has become more pressing. He also works as a musician. “It’s not feasible to be able to pay for procedures with the lack of hours,” he said.
Nearly half of all Americans say they or someone they live with has delayed care since the onslaught of coronavirus, according to a survey last month from the Kaiser Family Foundation. While most of those individuals expected to receive care within the next three months, about a third said they planned to wait longer or not seek it at all.
While the survey didn’t ask people why they were putting off care, there is ample evidence that medical bills can be a powerful deterrent. “We know historically we have always seen large shares of people who have put off care for cost reasons,” said Liz Hamel, the director of public opinion and survey research at Kaiser.
And, just as the Great Recession led people to seek less hospital care, the current downturn is likely to have a significant impact, said Sara Collins, an executive at the Commonwealth Fund, who studies access to care. “This is a major economic recession,” she said. “It’s going to have an effect on people’s demand for health care.”
The inability to afford care is “going to be a bigger and bigger issue moving forward,” said Chas Roades, the co-founder of Gist Healthcare, which advises hospitals and doctors. Hospital executives say their patient volumes will remain at about 20 percent lower than before the pandemic….
anne:
I shot an email off to Andrew Sprung at xpostfactoid asking the question where in Medicaid does it specify monthly income as opposed to annual income. He is one of the experts I read for confirmation of what I know. He is in some of the news – worthy blogs recognized (forgot which one). To support what I have said, I turned to KFF for general information. Two comments stated in their posting on being eligible for Medicaid:
As Unemployment Skyrockets, KFF Estimates More than 20 Million People Losing Job-Based Health Coverage Will Become Eligible for ACA Coverage through Medicaid or Marketplace Tax Credits
and here:
Eligibility for ACA Health Coverage Following Job Loss
The people who work the healthcare exchanges talk to Andrew. He must be credible? With that being said, I found the line I was looking for at KFF and bolded it above. Again with that being said, I can not find info of this at state Medicaid sites which is a maze of questions with no direct bearing to this issue of qualifying and current vs annual income. They make it purposely complex and murky to discourage applicants.
I have seen the same at student loan servicing and unemployment. I do find that if you talk with someone and ask the question of current or annual, they will answer in a similar manner of when you applied were you working or not? Unemployment does not allow the latitude student loans or Medicaid does and you have to be on guard more so. I guess the whole process might be labeled as odious due to the fear of the results of your conversation.
If I hear more, I will respond.
Run:
As Unemployment Skyrockets, KFF Estimates More than 20 Million People Losing Job-Based Health Coverage Will Become Eligible for ACA Coverage through Medicaid or Marketplace Tax Credits…
I can not find info of this at state Medicaid sites which is a maze of questions with no direct bearing to this issue of qualifying and current vs annual income. They make it purposely complex and murky to discourage applicants.
[ Fascinating and, of course, important. ]
Run:
Income is determined on a current basis, so prior wages for workers recently unemployed are not relevant. In states that have not expanded Medicaid under the ACA, eligibility is generally limited to parents with very low incomes (typically below 50% of poverty and in some states quite a bit less); thus many adults may fall into the “coverage gap” that exists for those with incomes above Medicaid limits but below poverty…
Run
thanks for this. you should have a syndicated column. or distribute pamphlets like “Common Sense”.
Long time ago I worked as food stamp certifier. We were supposed to explain the program to applicants. When I tried to explain the program to my boss, I got fired. Nobody there tried to explain other programs (welfare) to the clients. And many of the workers (certifiers) either did not know the program themselves, or did not think it worth their trouble to explain to the clients.
coberly:
Believe it or not and Dan knows:
I was interviewed to do a movie and to offer examples of medical issues.
I was asked to do a podcast.
I have written three articles for other sites wich were posted and are on here also.
Thank you for your compliments. It is like I soak this stuff up and try to explain it as briefly as possible for people. Too many issues, it is boring stuff and medical people are hostile. Maggie Mahar would always complain about the doctors.
Run:
Excellent.
https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2019/demo/p60-267.pdf
November 8, 2019
People Without Health Insurance Coverage, 2007-2018
(Thousands without insurance for entire year)
2007 ( 44,088)
2008 ( 44,780)
2009 ( 48,985) Obama
2010 ( 49,951) (Affordable Care Act)
2011 ( 48,613)
2012 ( 47,951)
2013 ( 41,795)
2014 ( 32,968)
2015 ( 28,966)
2016 ( 28,052)
2017 ( 25,600) Trump
2018 ( 27,462)
(Percent without insurance for entire year)
2007 ( 14.7)
2008 ( 14.9)
2009 ( 16.1) Obama
2010 ( 16.3) (Affordable Care Act)
2011 ( 15.7)
2012 ( 15.4)
2013 ( 13.3)
2014 ( 10.4)
2015 ( 9.1)
2016 ( 8.8)
2017 ( 7.9) Trump
2018 ( 8.5)
https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2019/demo/p60-267.pdf
November 8, 2019
Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2018
Highlights
• In 2018, 8.5 percent of people, or 27.5 million, did not have health insurance at any point during the year. The uninsured rate and number of uninsured increased from 2017 (7.9 percent or 25.6 million).
• The percentage of people with health insurance coverage for all or part of 2018 was 91.5 percent, lower than the rate in 2017 (92.1 percent). Between 2017 and 2018, the percentage of people with public coverage decreased 0.4 percentage points, and the percentage of people with private coverage did not statistically change.
• In 2018, private health insurance coverage continued to be more prevalent than public coverage, covering 67.3 percent of the population and 34.4 percent of the population, respectively. Of the subtypes of health insurance coverage, employer-based insurance remained the most common, covering 55.1 percent of the population for all or part of the calendar year.
• Between 2017 and 2018, the percentage of people covered by Medicaid decreased by 0.7 percentage points to 17.9 percent. The rate of Medicare coverage increased by 0.4 percentage points to 17.8 percent.
• The percentage of uninsured children under the age of 19 increased by 0.6 percentage points between 2017 and 2018, to 5.5 percent.