Scenes from the employment report
by New Deal democrat
Scenes from the employment report
As I described in my detailed post on the April jobs report, below, almost everything moved in the right direction, and significantly so. Let me lay out a few graphs to show the longer-term stronger and weaker points.
In the good news department, the U6 underemployment rate has been falling at a good clip in the last few months, and at 8.6%, is about 0.6% from representing a reasonably “full” employment situation:
Part of the U6 calculation is those employed part time for economic reasons. This isn’t down to normal yet, but continues to make good progress:
What is particularly good news is that both the U3 and U6 un- and under-employment rates are falling, even though people in the prime working age demographic are coming off the sidelines in substantial numbers:
The only other times in the last 30 years there has been a 1%+ increase in prime age labor force participation (red line above) were 1988 and 1995.
This *relatively* stout increase in participation is probably an important reason why nominal YoY wage gains for nonsupervisory workers have stalled:
Finally, we still have about 1 million or more people who aren’t even bothering to look for work, but would like a job now:
This equates to roughly 0.7% of the prime age population.
In sum, we still need to move this +0.7% off the sidelines and into actual employment, and also add another +0.6% or so from underemployment to complete employment before we can say that the the economy is operating at “full employment.” And we are almost 8 years out from the beginning of this expansion, and probably a lot closer to the beginning of the next downturn. This is simply not an economy that in secular terms is working for the average American.
Great stuff. Thank you.
Anyway to run these taking out the FIRE sector? I think it would be interesting to focus on those aspects of the economy that we want to grow (and to provide insights) while making sure the recent, unnatural growth in this sector does not skew our view of the economy where most of us live.
I think prime age labor force numbers have probably about peaked and will start moving more sideways ala 1997. Your forgetting the oil/financial bust of 2015 which really didn’t have a large deflationary effect on wages until 2016. I suspect the rest of the economy’s wages have likely accelerated rapidly enough by now, that it is offsetting deep declines in these oil to make a illusion of “softening” in the total wage market, but that itself is a lie. As that lie weeds out over 2017, You should get a more realistic version of where wage growth are really at by this fall(which is probably higher than you think).
Frankly, I view financial bubbles the heart of capitalism. Some are YUGE!!!! like 2008 and some are very small like 2015. But they will come. Whether it is railroads, the internet or Real Estate, they will come. Trying to stop them makes capitalism impossible to function. Even the post-war boom was a financial bubble based around the cold war state/local level government spending boom that collapsed in the late 60’s.