John McCain and Hannity Dan Crawford | June 16, 2014 2:06 pm Hot Topics Politics From All In with Chris Hayes, MSNBC 2001-2003 Comments (3) | Digg Facebook Twitter |
Who sez lightning don’t strike twice(three times actually). Wait and watch.
I’ve no special love for Saddam Hussein. But what the US has done in Iraq is nothing but export of skewed democracy to Iraq and now Iraq is at the threshold of disintegration. In fact, McCain says there were massive evidences of the presence of Weapons for mass destruction. But till date not a single one is found. Have any one given a thought what this means in the international community? It’s called loss of integrity before the international community because my country waged a war on another country on the basis of wrong intel. Does McCaine cares what does that mean? It means loss of face for the Americans and the US before international community.
US boys would have preserved the gains of Bush’s [no WMD’s] errors in Iraq. Per Romney.
If only the US had left advisors [how sucked in to Vietnam] in Iraq……(National Review talking head, with British accent)
Then Baghdadi would be running off Iraqi soldiers with US advisors taking losses, just like Vietnam. Then US advisors will show them how to track body count, just like Vietnam. Then Maliki will be deposed with help from the US state Department because he is not popular [more Sunni inclusion in parliament????] enough with the enemy, just like they did to Diem in Vietnam. Next US will move whole villages into strategic hamlets to keep them from talking with their cousins in Baghdadi’s group, just like Vietnam.
Then the government troops will be embarrassed and US forces called in just like Vietnam.
If they don’t have the loyalty or the leaders to do it for themselves US boys and US trillions are only for profit.
Hanoi Jane McCain!
If the Iraqi’s would only see ISIS is no more dangerous than Tea Party