• About
  • Contact
  • Editorial
  • Policies
  • Archives
Angry Bear
Relevant and even prescient commentary on news, politics and the economy.
  • US/Global Economics
  • Taxes/regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Climate Change
  • Social Security
  • Hot Topics
« Back

Temporarily embarrassed millionaires

Dan Crawford | November 14, 2013 10:18 pm

Dan here….Somehow this makes sense:

“Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires.” – John Steinbeck

Comments (5) | Digg Facebook Twitter |
5 Comments
  • Jerry Critter says:
    November 14, 2013 at 11:08 pm

    That quote explains poor republicans.

  • J.Goodwin says:
    November 15, 2013 at 11:51 am

    Absolutely 100% true. The lower middle class and upper lower class believes they have the ability to migrate into the upper class. They don’t want to take away benefits from the rich because they think they can become rich.

  • J.Goodwin says:
    November 15, 2013 at 11:55 am

    It might also explain the rural/urban divide. Rural people have less relevant comparison points for relative income etc, and may also be more likely to have minimum housing levels etc. Would be interesting to see relative asset levels of rural people living at or below the poverty line and urban people with the same income levels, even adjusted for relative cost of living. The same income for cost of living might make you homeless in the city, but if you have property in a rural area, at least you won’t be that.

  • Jack says:
    November 15, 2013 at 5:53 pm

    The identification paradigm goes only so far in explaining the adherence of the working class to the ideology of the wealthy. More likely the the conservatives have recognized that social issues are more important to a vast number of their less wealthy brethren and have been using those issues as the hook to a generally political strategy. There is a great deal of money behind anti-abortion, anti-gun control and anti-gay propaganda. Even the small government theme is put within a social policy frame of reference. Anti-union campaigns bridge the gap, but still have a primarily social tint.

  • hans says:
    November 16, 2013 at 2:05 am

    The quote makes little sense except those with a political agenda..

Featured Stories

Macron Bypasses Parliament With ‘Nuclear Option’ on Retirement Age Hike

Angry Bear

All Electric comes to Heavy Equipment

Daniel Becker

Medicare Plan Commissions May Steer Beneficiaries to Wrong Coverage

run75441

Thoughts on Silicon Valley Bank: Why the FDIC plan isn’t (but also is) a Bailout

NewDealdemocrat

Contributors

Dan Crawford
Robert Waldmann
Barkley Rosser
Eric Kramer
ProGrowth Liberal
Daniel Becker
Ken Houghton
Linda Beale
Mike Kimel
Steve Roth
Michael Smith
Bill Haskell
NewDealdemocrat
Ken Melvin
Sandwichman
Peter Dorman
Kenneth Thomas
Bruce Webb
Rebecca Wilder
Spencer England
Beverly Mann
Joel Eissenberg

Subscribe

Blogs of note

    • Naked Capitalism
    • Atrios (Eschaton)
    • Crooks and Liars
    • Wash. Monthly
    • CEPR
    • Econospeak
    • EPI
    • Hullabaloo
    • Talking Points
    • Calculated Risk
    • Infidel753
    • ACA Signups
    • The one-handed economist
Angry Bear
Copyright © 2023 Angry Bear Blog

Topics

  • US/Global Economics
  • Taxes/regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Climate Change
  • Social Security
  • Hot Topics
  • US/Global Economics
  • Taxes/regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Climate Change
  • Social Security
  • Hot Topics

Pages

  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial
  • Policies
  • Archives