• About
  • Contact
  • Editorial
  • Policies
  • Archives
Angry Bear
Relevant and even prescient commentary on news, politics and the economy.
  • US/Global Economics
  • Taxes/regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Climate Change
  • Social Security
  • Hot Topics
« Back

Open thread August 16, 2013

Dan Crawford | August 16, 2013 9:53 am

Tags: open thread Comments (1) | Digg Facebook Twitter |
1 Comment
  • Denis Drew says:
    August 16, 2013 at 11:08 am

    Following the New York federal court finding that NYPD’s stop-and-frisk policy routinely violates the Fourth Amendment privacy rights of hundreds of thousands — the mayor and his lackeys went ballistic, comparing New York’s relatively low homicide stats to Chicago’s horrible numbers — claiming stop-and-frisk is the difference (which would not matter because it is illegal anyway — why not just go around kicking down doors without warrants if results are all that matter).

    Last year (2112) NYC homicides dipped 20% — last year NYPD stops dropped 22%. Listening Chicago?

    515 NYC homicides in 2011 — 414 NYC homicides in 2012
    http://gothamist.com/2012/12/28/nyc_hits_record_low_murder_rate_in.php

    685,724 NYPD stops in 2011 — 533,042 NYPD stops in 2012
    http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/major_decline_in_nypd_stop_frisks_UH6jmAZBUhv8Hk1wZ2TycM

    Another interesting factoid:
    “Further, stop-and-frisk has not reduced the number of people who fall victim to shootings. In 2002, there were 1,892 victims of gunfire and 97,296 stops. In 2011, there were still 1,821 victims of gunfire but a record 685,724 stops.”
    http://www.nyclu.org/node/1598

    What intelligent person would come up with a crime fighting strategy that consisted of stopping hundreds of thousands of persons at random — what is that supposed to produce?

Featured Stories

Macron Bypasses Parliament With ‘Nuclear Option’ on Retirement Age Hike

Angry Bear

All Electric comes to Heavy Equipment

Daniel Becker

Medicare Plan Commissions May Steer Beneficiaries to Wrong Coverage

run75441

Thoughts on Silicon Valley Bank: Why the FDIC plan isn’t (but also is) a Bailout

NewDealdemocrat

Contributors

Dan Crawford
Robert Waldmann
Barkley Rosser
Eric Kramer
ProGrowth Liberal
Daniel Becker
Ken Houghton
Linda Beale
Mike Kimel
Steve Roth
Michael Smith
Bill Haskell
NewDealdemocrat
Ken Melvin
Sandwichman
Peter Dorman
Kenneth Thomas
Bruce Webb
Rebecca Wilder
Spencer England
Beverly Mann
Joel Eissenberg

Subscribe

Blogs of note

    • Naked Capitalism
    • Atrios (Eschaton)
    • Crooks and Liars
    • Wash. Monthly
    • CEPR
    • Econospeak
    • EPI
    • Hullabaloo
    • Talking Points
    • Calculated Risk
    • Infidel753
    • ACA Signups
    • The one-handed economist
Angry Bear
Copyright © 2023 Angry Bear Blog

Topics

  • US/Global Economics
  • Taxes/regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Climate Change
  • Social Security
  • Hot Topics
  • US/Global Economics
  • Taxes/regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Climate Change
  • Social Security
  • Hot Topics

Pages

  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial
  • Policies
  • Archives